Add recovery handoff system notices (#5289)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Agent runs can end productively while the source issue still lacks a
durable final disposition.
> - That leaves the control plane unsure whether to resume, escalate, or
close the work.
> - Issue comments also need a presentation contract so system-authored
recovery notices can render as first-class thread messages without
overloading normal comments.
> - This pull request adds successful-run handoff recovery, comment
presentation metadata, and system notice rendering.
> - The benefit is stricter task liveness with clearer operator-facing
recovery state.

## What Changed

- Added successful-run handoff decisions, wake payloads, escalation
behavior, and recovery tests.
- Added issue comment presentation metadata with migration
`0078_white_darwin.sql` and shared/server/company portability support.
- Rendered recovery/system notices in issue chat with dedicated UI
components, fixtures, tests, and storybook/lab coverage.
- Included the current recovery model-profile hint patch so automatic
recovery follow-ups use the cheap profile.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.test.ts
ui/src/components/SystemNotice.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/system-notice-comment.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueChatThreadSystemNotice.test.tsx`

## Risks

- Migration-bearing PR: merge this before any other branch that might
later add a migration.
- The branch touches both recovery services and issue-thread rendering,
so review should pay attention to recovery wake idempotency and comment
metadata compatibility.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with
shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
2026-05-06 06:05:58 -05:00
committed by GitHub
parent 50db8c01d2
commit 454edfe81e
70 changed files with 21919 additions and 125 deletions
+11
View File
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ import { buildIssueTree, countDescendants } from "../lib/issue-tree";
import { buildSubIssueDefaultsForViewer } from "../lib/subIssueDefaults";
import { statusBadge } from "../lib/status-colors";
import { workflowSort } from "../lib/workflow-sort";
import { isSuccessfulRunHandoffRequired } from "../lib/successful-run-handoff";
import { ISSUE_STATUSES, type Issue, type IssueStatus, type Project } from "@paperclipai/shared";
const ISSUE_SEARCH_DEBOUNCE_MS = 250;
const ISSUE_SEARCH_RESULT_LIMIT = 200;
@@ -1528,6 +1529,16 @@ export function IssuesList({
</span>
)
) : null}
{isSuccessfulRunHandoffRequired(issue) ? (
<span
className="ml-1.5 inline-flex items-center gap-1 rounded-full border border-amber-400/45 bg-amber-50/60 px-1.5 py-0.5 text-[10px] font-medium text-amber-700 dark:border-amber-300/35 dark:bg-amber-400/10 dark:text-amber-300"
aria-label="Needs next step"
title="This issue needs a next step"
>
<CircleDot className="h-3 w-3" />
Needs next step
</span>
) : null}
</>
)}
className={isMutedIssue ? "opacity-70" : undefined}