forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
454edfe81e
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Agent runs can end productively while the source issue still lacks a durable final disposition. > - That leaves the control plane unsure whether to resume, escalate, or close the work. > - Issue comments also need a presentation contract so system-authored recovery notices can render as first-class thread messages without overloading normal comments. > - This pull request adds successful-run handoff recovery, comment presentation metadata, and system notice rendering. > - The benefit is stricter task liveness with clearer operator-facing recovery state. ## What Changed - Added successful-run handoff decisions, wake payloads, escalation behavior, and recovery tests. - Added issue comment presentation metadata with migration `0078_white_darwin.sql` and shared/server/company portability support. - Rendered recovery/system notices in issue chat with dedicated UI components, fixtures, tests, and storybook/lab coverage. - Included the current recovery model-profile hint patch so automatic recovery follow-ups use the cheap profile. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.test.ts ui/src/components/SystemNotice.test.tsx ui/src/lib/system-notice-comment.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueChatThreadSystemNotice.test.tsx` ## Risks - Migration-bearing PR: merge this before any other branch that might later add a migration. - The branch touches both recovery services and issue-thread rendering, so review should pay attention to recovery wake idempotency and comment metadata compatibility. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
78 lines
3.4 KiB
TypeScript
78 lines
3.4 KiB
TypeScript
import type { Agent } from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { formatActivityVerb, formatIssueActivityAction } from "./activity-format";
|
|
|
|
describe("activity formatting", () => {
|
|
const agentMap = new Map<string, Agent>([
|
|
["agent-reviewer", { id: "agent-reviewer", name: "Reviewer Bot" } as Agent],
|
|
["agent-approver", { id: "agent-approver", name: "Approver Bot" } as Agent],
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
it("formats blocker activity using linked issue identifiers", () => {
|
|
const details = {
|
|
addedBlockedByIssues: [
|
|
{ id: "issue-2", identifier: "PAP-22", title: "Blocked task" },
|
|
],
|
|
removedBlockedByIssues: [],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(formatActivityVerb("issue.blockers_updated", details)).toBe("added blocker PAP-22 to");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.blockers_updated", details)).toBe("added blocker PAP-22");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("formats reviewer activity using agent names", () => {
|
|
const details = {
|
|
addedParticipants: [
|
|
{ type: "agent", agentId: "agent-reviewer", userId: null },
|
|
],
|
|
removedParticipants: [],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(formatActivityVerb("issue.reviewers_updated", details, { agentMap })).toBe("added reviewer Reviewer Bot to");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.reviewers_updated", details, { agentMap })).toBe("added reviewer Reviewer Bot");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("formats approver removals using user-aware labels", () => {
|
|
const details = {
|
|
addedParticipants: [],
|
|
removedParticipants: [
|
|
{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" },
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(formatActivityVerb("issue.approvers_updated", details)).toBe("removed approver Board from");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.approvers_updated", details)).toBe("removed approver Board");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("falls back to updated wording when reviewers are both added and removed", () => {
|
|
const details = {
|
|
addedParticipants: [
|
|
{ type: "agent", agentId: "agent-reviewer", userId: null },
|
|
],
|
|
removedParticipants: [
|
|
{ type: "agent", agentId: "agent-approver", userId: null },
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(formatActivityVerb("issue.reviewers_updated", details, { agentMap })).toBe("updated reviewers on");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.reviewers_updated", details, { agentMap })).toBe("updated reviewers");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("formats monitor activity with direct verbs", () => {
|
|
expect(formatActivityVerb("issue.monitor_scheduled")).toBe("scheduled monitor on");
|
|
expect(formatActivityVerb("issue.monitor_exhausted")).toBe("exhausted monitor on");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.monitor_triggered")).toBe("triggered a monitor");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.monitor_cleared")).toBe("cleared a monitor");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.monitor_recovery_issue_created")).toBe("created a monitor recovery issue");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses plain next-step copy for successful-run handoff activity", () => {
|
|
expect(formatActivityVerb("issue.successful_run_handoff_required")).toBe("flagged missing next step on");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.successful_run_handoff_required")).toBe("Run finished without a clear next step");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.successful_run_handoff_resolved")).toBe("Next step chosen");
|
|
expect(formatIssueActivityAction("issue.successful_run_handoff_escalated")).toBe(
|
|
"Run finished without a next step - recovery escalated",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|