forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
9a8d219949
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - A fast-moving control plane needs stable local tests and repeatable local maintenance tools so contributors can safely split and review work > - Several route suites needed stronger isolation, Codex manual model selection needed a faster-mode option, and local browser cleanup missed Playwright's headless shell binary > - Storybook static output also needed to be preserved as a generated review artifact from the working branch > - This pull request groups the test/local-dev maintenance pieces so they can be reviewed separately from product runtime changes > - The benefit is more predictable contributor verification and cleaner local maintenance without mixing these changes into feature PRs ## What Changed - Added stable Vitest runner support and serialized route/authz test isolation. - Fixed workspace runtime authz route mocks and stabilized Claude/company-import related assertions. - Allowed Codex fast mode for manually selected models. - Broadened the agent browser cleanup script to detect `chrome-headless-shell` as well as Chrome for Testing. - Preserved generated Storybook static output from the source branch. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts` from `server/` passed: 2 files, 19 tests. - `pnpm exec vitest run src/server/codex-args.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts` from `packages/adapters/codex-local/` passed: 1 file, 3 tests. - `bash -n scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh && scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh --dry` passed; dry-run detected `chrome-headless-shell` processes without killing them. - `test -f ui/storybook-static/index.html && test -f ui/storybook-static/assets/forms-editors.stories-Dry7qwx2.js` passed. - `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-test-local-maintenance -- . ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts --config cli/vitest.config.ts` did not complete in the isolated split worktree because `paperclipai run` exited during build prep with `TS2688: Cannot find type definition file for 'react'`; this appears to be caused by the worktree dependency symlink setup, not the code under test. - Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Risks - Medium risk: the stable Vitest runner changes how route/authz tests are scheduled. - Generated `ui/storybook-static` files are large and contain minified third-party output; `git diff --check` reports whitespace inside those generated assets, so reviewers may choose to drop or regenerate that artifact before merge. - No database migrations. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable to source UI behavior; the included Storybook static output is generated artifact preservation from the source branch. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
314 lines
8.8 KiB
TypeScript
314 lines
8.8 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const companyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
|
|
const agentId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
|
|
const routineId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
|
|
const projectId = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
|
|
const otherAgentId = "55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555";
|
|
|
|
const routine = {
|
|
id: routineId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
projectId,
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
parentIssueId: null,
|
|
title: "Daily routine",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
concurrencyPolicy: "coalesce_if_active",
|
|
catchUpPolicy: "skip_missed",
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
updatedByAgentId: null,
|
|
updatedByUserId: null,
|
|
lastTriggeredAt: null,
|
|
lastEnqueuedAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-20T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-20T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
const pausedRoutine = {
|
|
...routine,
|
|
status: "paused",
|
|
};
|
|
const trigger = {
|
|
id: "66666666-6666-4666-8666-666666666666",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
routineId,
|
|
kind: "schedule",
|
|
label: "weekday",
|
|
enabled: false,
|
|
cronExpression: "0 10 * * 1-5",
|
|
timezone: "UTC",
|
|
nextRunAt: null,
|
|
lastFiredAt: null,
|
|
publicId: null,
|
|
secretId: null,
|
|
signingMode: null,
|
|
replayWindowSec: null,
|
|
lastRotatedAt: null,
|
|
lastResult: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
updatedByAgentId: null,
|
|
updatedByUserId: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-20T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-20T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
list: vi.fn(),
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
getDetail: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
create: vi.fn(),
|
|
listRuns: vi.fn(),
|
|
createTrigger: vi.fn(),
|
|
getTrigger: vi.fn(),
|
|
updateTrigger: vi.fn(),
|
|
deleteTrigger: vi.fn(),
|
|
rotateTriggerSecret: vi.fn(),
|
|
runRoutine: vi.fn(),
|
|
firePublicTrigger: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
|
const mockTrackRoutineCreated = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
|
const mockGetTelemetryClient = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
|
|
|
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("../routes/authz.js", async () => vi.importActual("../routes/authz.js"));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
|
|
trackRoutineCreated: mockTrackRoutineCreated,
|
|
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
|
|
getTelemetryClient: mockGetTelemetryClient,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
const [{ errorHandler }, { routineRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/routines.js")>("../routes/routines.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", routineRoutes({} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("routine routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/routines.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
registerModuleMocks();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockGetTelemetryClient.mockReturnValue({ track: vi.fn() });
|
|
mockRoutineService.create.mockResolvedValue(routine);
|
|
mockRoutineService.get.mockResolvedValue(routine);
|
|
mockRoutineService.getTrigger.mockResolvedValue(trigger);
|
|
mockRoutineService.update.mockResolvedValue({ ...routine, assigneeAgentId: otherAgentId });
|
|
mockRoutineService.runRoutine.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "run-1",
|
|
source: "manual",
|
|
status: "issue_created",
|
|
});
|
|
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(false);
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires tasks:assign permission for non-admin board routine creation", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/companies/${companyId}/routines`)
|
|
.send({
|
|
projectId,
|
|
title: "Daily routine",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
|
|
expect(mockRoutineService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires tasks:assign permission to retarget a routine assignee", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.patch(`/api/routines/${routineId}`)
|
|
.send({
|
|
assigneeAgentId: otherAgentId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
|
|
expect(mockRoutineService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires tasks:assign permission to reactivate a routine", async () => {
|
|
mockRoutineService.get.mockResolvedValue(pausedRoutine);
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.patch(`/api/routines/${routineId}`)
|
|
.send({
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
|
|
expect(mockRoutineService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires tasks:assign permission to create a trigger", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/routines/${routineId}/triggers`)
|
|
.send({
|
|
kind: "schedule",
|
|
cronExpression: "0 10 * * *",
|
|
timezone: "UTC",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
|
|
expect(mockRoutineService.createTrigger).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires tasks:assign permission to update a trigger", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.patch(`/api/routine-triggers/${trigger.id}`)
|
|
.send({
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
|
|
expect(mockRoutineService.updateTrigger).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires tasks:assign permission to manually run a routine", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/routines/${routineId}/run`)
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
|
|
expect(mockRoutineService.runRoutine).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows routine creation when the board user has tasks:assign", async () => {
|
|
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/companies/${companyId}/routines`)
|
|
.send({
|
|
projectId,
|
|
title: "Daily routine",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
|
|
expect(mockRoutineService.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(companyId, expect.objectContaining({
|
|
projectId,
|
|
title: "Daily routine",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
|
|
}), {
|
|
agentId: null,
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(mockTrackRoutineCreated).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything());
|
|
});
|
|
});
|