Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta 9a8d219949 [codex] Stabilize tests and local maintenance assets (#4423)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A fast-moving control plane needs stable local tests and repeatable
local maintenance tools so contributors can safely split and review work
> - Several route suites needed stronger isolation, Codex manual model
selection needed a faster-mode option, and local browser cleanup missed
Playwright's headless shell binary
> - Storybook static output also needed to be preserved as a generated
review artifact from the working branch
> - This pull request groups the test/local-dev maintenance pieces so
they can be reviewed separately from product runtime changes
> - The benefit is more predictable contributor verification and cleaner
local maintenance without mixing these changes into feature PRs

## What Changed

- Added stable Vitest runner support and serialized route/authz test
isolation.
- Fixed workspace runtime authz route mocks and stabilized
Claude/company-import related assertions.
- Allowed Codex fast mode for manually selected models.
- Broadened the agent browser cleanup script to detect
`chrome-headless-shell` as well as Chrome for Testing.
- Preserved generated Storybook static output from the source branch.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run
src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts
src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts`
from `server/` passed: 2 files, 19 tests.
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/server/codex-args.test.ts --config
vitest.config.ts` from `packages/adapters/codex-local/` passed: 1 file,
3 tests.
- `bash -n scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh &&
scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh --dry` passed; dry-run detected
`chrome-headless-shell` processes without killing them.
- `test -f ui/storybook-static/index.html && test -f
ui/storybook-static/assets/forms-editors.stories-Dry7qwx2.js` passed.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-test-local-maintenance --
. ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts --config
cli/vitest.config.ts` did not complete in the isolated split worktree
because `paperclipai run` exited during build prep with `TS2688: Cannot
find type definition file for 'react'`; this appears to be caused by the
worktree dependency symlink setup, not the code under test.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.

## Risks

- Medium risk: the stable Vitest runner changes how route/authz tests
are scheduled.
- Generated `ui/storybook-static` files are large and contain minified
third-party output; `git diff --check` reports whitespace inside those
generated assets, so reviewers may choose to drop or regenerate that
artifact before merge.
- No database migrations.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable to source UI behavior;
the included Storybook static output is generated artifact preservation
from the source branch.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 15:11:42 -05:00

314 lines
8.8 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const companyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const agentId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
const routineId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const projectId = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
const otherAgentId = "55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555";
const routine = {
id: routineId,
companyId,
projectId,
goalId: null,
parentIssueId: null,
title: "Daily routine",
description: null,
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
priority: "medium",
status: "active",
concurrencyPolicy: "coalesce_if_active",
catchUpPolicy: "skip_missed",
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: null,
updatedByAgentId: null,
updatedByUserId: null,
lastTriggeredAt: null,
lastEnqueuedAt: null,
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-20T00:00:00.000Z"),
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-20T00:00:00.000Z"),
};
const pausedRoutine = {
...routine,
status: "paused",
};
const trigger = {
id: "66666666-6666-4666-8666-666666666666",
companyId,
routineId,
kind: "schedule",
label: "weekday",
enabled: false,
cronExpression: "0 10 * * 1-5",
timezone: "UTC",
nextRunAt: null,
lastFiredAt: null,
publicId: null,
secretId: null,
signingMode: null,
replayWindowSec: null,
lastRotatedAt: null,
lastResult: null,
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: null,
updatedByAgentId: null,
updatedByUserId: null,
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-20T00:00:00.000Z"),
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-20T00:00:00.000Z"),
};
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
list: vi.fn(),
get: vi.fn(),
getDetail: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
create: vi.fn(),
listRuns: vi.fn(),
createTrigger: vi.fn(),
getTrigger: vi.fn(),
updateTrigger: vi.fn(),
deleteTrigger: vi.fn(),
rotateTriggerSecret: vi.fn(),
runRoutine: vi.fn(),
firePublicTrigger: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockTrackRoutineCreated = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
const mockGetTelemetryClient = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../routes/authz.js", async () => vi.importActual("../routes/authz.js"));
vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
trackRoutineCreated: mockTrackRoutineCreated,
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
getTelemetryClient: mockGetTelemetryClient,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
}));
}
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
const [{ errorHandler }, { routineRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/routines.js")>("../routes/routines.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = actor;
next();
});
app.use("/api", routineRoutes({} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
describe("routine routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry");
vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/routines.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockGetTelemetryClient.mockReturnValue({ track: vi.fn() });
mockRoutineService.create.mockResolvedValue(routine);
mockRoutineService.get.mockResolvedValue(routine);
mockRoutineService.getTrigger.mockResolvedValue(trigger);
mockRoutineService.update.mockResolvedValue({ ...routine, assigneeAgentId: otherAgentId });
mockRoutineService.runRoutine.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-1",
source: "manual",
status: "issue_created",
});
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(false);
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
});
it("requires tasks:assign permission for non-admin board routine creation", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [companyId],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post(`/api/companies/${companyId}/routines`)
.send({
projectId,
title: "Daily routine",
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
expect(mockRoutineService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("requires tasks:assign permission to retarget a routine assignee", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [companyId],
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch(`/api/routines/${routineId}`)
.send({
assigneeAgentId: otherAgentId,
});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
expect(mockRoutineService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("requires tasks:assign permission to reactivate a routine", async () => {
mockRoutineService.get.mockResolvedValue(pausedRoutine);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [companyId],
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch(`/api/routines/${routineId}`)
.send({
status: "active",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
expect(mockRoutineService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("requires tasks:assign permission to create a trigger", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [companyId],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post(`/api/routines/${routineId}/triggers`)
.send({
kind: "schedule",
cronExpression: "0 10 * * *",
timezone: "UTC",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
expect(mockRoutineService.createTrigger).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("requires tasks:assign permission to update a trigger", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [companyId],
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch(`/api/routine-triggers/${trigger.id}`)
.send({
enabled: true,
});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
expect(mockRoutineService.updateTrigger).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("requires tasks:assign permission to manually run a routine", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [companyId],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post(`/api/routines/${routineId}/run`)
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("tasks:assign");
expect(mockRoutineService.runRoutine).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("allows routine creation when the board user has tasks:assign", async () => {
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(true);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: [companyId],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post(`/api/companies/${companyId}/routines`)
.send({
projectId,
title: "Daily routine",
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
});
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockRoutineService.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(companyId, expect.objectContaining({
projectId,
title: "Daily routine",
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
}), {
agentId: null,
userId: "board-user",
});
expect(mockTrackRoutineCreated).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything());
});
});