Files
paperclip/packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts
T
Dotta 4142559c37 [codex] Add blocked inbox attention view (#5603)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies through
company-scoped issues, comments, approvals, and execution workspaces.
> - Operators need the Inbox to show not only active work, but also
blocked work that may need human or agent attention.
> - The existing inbox experience did not have a dedicated blocked-work
surface, so blocked tasks were harder to triage and resume deliberately.
> - Backend consumers also needed a compact attention signal that
distinguishes actionable blockers from covered or waiting blocker
states.
> - This pull request adds a Blocked Inbox tab backed by issue
blocker-attention metadata, shared validators, and UI helpers.
> - The benefit is a clearer triage path for stalled or blocked
Paperclip work without exposing external wait internals in the
operator-facing UI.

## What Changed

- Added shared issue blocker-attention types, validators, and exports
for the API/UI contract.
- Added backend blocker-attention computation and issue route support
for blocked inbox data.
- Added the Blocked Inbox tab, blocked reason chips, filtering/search
UI, responsive layouts, and Storybook stories.
- Updated inbox helpers and page behavior so toolbar controls only
appear where they apply.
- Added coverage for shared validators, server blocker-attention
behavior, blocked inbox UI helpers/components, and the Inbox page.
- Added a screenshot helper script for the blocked inbox Storybook
stories.
- Addressed Greptile feedback by making urgency sorting deterministic
for null stop times, avoiding full blocked-inbox list enrichment for
counts, and hardening the screenshot helper.

## Verification

- Rebased the branch cleanly onto `public-gh/master`.
- Confirmed the diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
- Confirmed the diff does not include database migration files.
- Ran `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-blocker-attention.test.ts
ui/src/components/BlockedInboxView.test.tsx
ui/src/components/BlockedReasonChip.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/blockedInbox.test.ts ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`.
- Ran `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui
typecheck`.
- Checked `ROADMAP.md`; this is scoped inbox/operator triage work and
does not duplicate a listed roadmap feature.
- Greptile Review is green on the latest head and all four Greptile
review threads are resolved.
- GitHub PR checks are green on the latest head: policy, security/snyk,
e2e, verify, Canary Dry Run, Greptile Review, and serialized server
suites 1/4 through 4/4.

## Risks

- Medium review surface because this touches the shared issue contract,
server issue services, and the Inbox UI together.
- Blocker-attention classification may need product tuning after
operators use it on real blocked queues.
- UI screenshots were not attached in this PR-opening pass; the branch
includes `scripts/screenshot-blocked-inbox.mjs` and Storybook stories
for visual capture.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent with shell, git, GitHub CLI,
GitHub connector, and Paperclip API tool use. Reasoning mode: medium.
Context window: not exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-13 16:41:36 -05:00

366 lines
11 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import { MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH } from "../index.js";
import {
addIssueCommentSchema,
createIssueSchema,
issueBlockedInboxAttentionSchema,
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema,
respondIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
suggestedTaskDraftSchema,
updateIssueSchema,
upsertIssueDocumentSchema,
} from "./issue.js";
import { createAgentSchema } from "./agent.js";
describe("issue validators", () => {
it("passes real line breaks through unchanged", () => {
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
title: "Follow up PR",
description: "Line 1\n\nLine 2",
});
expect(parsed.description).toBe("Line 1\n\nLine 2");
});
it("accepts null and omitted optional multiline issue fields", () => {
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Follow up PR", description: null }).description)
.toBeNull();
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Follow up PR" }).description)
.toBeUndefined();
expect(updateIssueSchema.parse({ comment: undefined }).comment)
.toBeUndefined();
});
it("normalizes JSON-escaped line breaks in issue descriptions", () => {
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
title: "Follow up PR",
description: "PR: https://example.com/pr/1\\n\\nShip the follow-up.",
});
expect(parsed.description).toBe("PR: https://example.com/pr/1\n\nShip the follow-up.");
});
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in issue update comments", () => {
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.parse({
comment: "Done\\n\\n- Verified the route",
});
expect(parsed.comment).toBe("Done\n\n- Verified the route");
});
it("allows false-positive recovery resolutions to atomically restore the source issue status", () => {
expect(
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.parse({
outcome: "false_positive",
sourceIssueStatus: "in_review",
}),
).toMatchObject({
outcome: "false_positive",
sourceIssueStatus: "in_review",
});
expect(
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
outcome: "false_positive",
sourceIssueStatus: "blocked",
}).success,
).toBe(false);
expect(
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
outcome: "false_positive",
}).success,
).toBe(false);
});
it("allows cancelled recovery resolutions to atomically restore the source issue status", () => {
expect(
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.parse({
outcome: "cancelled",
sourceIssueStatus: "in_review",
}),
).toMatchObject({
outcome: "cancelled",
sourceIssueStatus: "in_review",
});
expect(
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
outcome: "cancelled",
sourceIssueStatus: "blocked",
}).success,
).toBe(false);
expect(
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
outcome: "cancelled",
}).success,
).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects recovery outcomes that are not supported by the source-scoped resolution endpoint", () => {
expect(
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
outcome: "delegated",
}).success,
).toBe(false);
expect(
resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema.safeParse({
outcome: "escalated",
}).success,
).toBe(false);
});
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in issue comment bodies", () => {
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.parse({
body: "Progress update\\r\\n\\r\\nNext action.",
});
expect(parsed.body).toBe("Progress update\n\nNext action.");
});
it("accepts structured issue comment presentation and metadata", () => {
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.parse({
body: "Paperclip needs a disposition before this issue can continue.",
authorType: "system",
presentation: {
kind: "system_notice",
tone: "warning",
title: "Needs disposition",
},
metadata: {
version: 1,
sourceRunId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
sections: [
{
title: "Evidence",
rows: [
{ type: "key_value", label: "Cause", value: "successful_run_missing_state" },
{ type: "issue_link", label: "Source issue", identifier: "PAP-3440" },
{ type: "run_link", label: "Run", runId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" },
],
},
],
},
});
expect(parsed.presentation?.detailsDefaultOpen).toBe(false);
expect(parsed.metadata?.sourceRunId).toBe("11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111");
expect(parsed.metadata?.sections[0]?.rows).toHaveLength(3);
});
it("rejects arbitrary issue comment metadata", () => {
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.safeParse({
body: "Hidden details",
metadata: {
version: 1,
transcript: "raw log dump",
},
});
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
});
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in generated task drafts", () => {
const parsed = suggestedTaskDraftSchema.parse({
clientKey: "task-1",
title: "Follow up",
description: "Line 1\\n\\nLine 2",
});
expect(parsed.description).toBe("Line 1\n\nLine 2");
});
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in thread summaries and documents", () => {
const response = respondIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
answers: [],
summaryMarkdown: "Summary\\n\\nNext action",
});
const document = upsertIssueDocumentSchema.parse({
format: "markdown",
body: "# Plan\\n\\nShip it",
});
expect(response.summaryMarkdown).toBe("Summary\n\nNext action");
expect(document.body).toBe("# Plan\n\nShip it");
});
it("clamps oversized requestDepth values on create", () => {
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
title: "Clamp request depth",
requestDepth: MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH + 500,
});
expect(parsed.requestDepth).toBe(MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH);
});
it("defaults omitted create status to todo when an assignee is present", () => {
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({
title: "Assigned work",
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
}).status).toBe("todo");
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Unassigned work" }).status).toBe("backlog");
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({
title: "Deliberately parked",
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "backlog",
}).status).toBe("backlog");
});
it("defaults issue work mode to standard and accepts planning", () => {
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Plan first" }).workMode).toBe("standard");
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Plan first", workMode: "planning" }).workMode).toBe("planning");
expect(updateIssueSchema.parse({ workMode: "planning" }).workMode).toBe("planning");
expect(suggestedTaskDraftSchema.parse({
clientKey: "planning-child",
title: "Plan child",
workMode: "planning",
}).workMode).toBe("planning");
});
it("validates blocked inbox attention payloads and requires redacted secret fields", () => {
const parsed = issueBlockedInboxAttentionSchema.parse({
kind: "blocked",
state: "needs_attention",
reason: "blocked_by_unassigned_issue",
severity: "critical",
stoppedSinceAt: "2026-05-09T12:00:00.000Z",
owner: { type: "unknown", agentId: null, userId: null, label: null },
action: { label: "Assign blocker", detail: "Assign the leaf blocker." },
sourceIssue: {
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
identifier: "PAP-1",
title: "Blocked source",
status: "blocked",
priority: "high",
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: null,
},
leafIssue: {
id: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
identifier: "PAP-2",
title: "Unassigned leaf",
status: "todo",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: null,
},
recoveryIssue: null,
approvalId: null,
interactionId: null,
sampleIssueIdentifier: "PAP-2",
redaction: {
externalDetailsRedacted: false,
secretFieldsOmitted: true,
},
});
expect(parsed.redaction.secretFieldsOmitted).toBe(true);
expect(issueBlockedInboxAttentionSchema.safeParse({
...parsed,
redaction: { externalDetailsRedacted: false, secretFieldsOmitted: false },
}).success).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects unknown issue work modes", () => {
expect(createIssueSchema.safeParse({ title: "Plan first", workMode: "normal" }).success).toBe(false);
expect(suggestedTaskDraftSchema.safeParse({
clientKey: "bad-child",
title: "Bad child",
workMode: "analysis",
}).success).toBe(false);
});
it("clamps oversized requestDepth values on update", () => {
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.parse({
requestDepth: MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH + 1,
});
expect(parsed.requestDepth).toBe(MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH);
});
it("accepts the cheap model profile in issue assignee adapter overrides", () => {
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
title: "Run a cheap heartbeat",
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
modelProfile: "cheap",
},
});
expect(parsed.assigneeAdapterOverrides?.modelProfile).toBe("cheap");
});
it("rejects unknown issue model profile keys", () => {
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.safeParse({
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
modelProfile: "fast",
},
});
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
});
it("validates agent runtime cheap model profile config without rejecting other runtime fields", () => {
const parsed = createAgentSchema.parse({
name: "Coder",
adapterType: "codex_local",
runtimeConfig: {
heartbeat: { enabled: true },
modelProfiles: {
cheap: {
enabled: true,
label: "Cheap Codex",
adapterConfig: {
model: "gpt-5.3-codex-spark",
},
},
},
},
});
expect(parsed.runtimeConfig.modelProfiles?.cheap?.adapterConfig).toEqual({
model: "gpt-5.3-codex-spark",
});
expect(parsed.runtimeConfig.heartbeat).toEqual({ enabled: true });
});
it("validates cheap model profile env bindings like top-level adapter config", () => {
const parsed = createAgentSchema.safeParse({
name: "Coder",
adapterType: "codex_local",
runtimeConfig: {
modelProfiles: {
cheap: {
adapterConfig: {
env: {
API_TOKEN: 123,
},
},
},
},
},
});
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects unknown agent runtime model profile keys", () => {
const parsed = createAgentSchema.safeParse({
name: "Coder",
adapterType: "codex_local",
runtimeConfig: {
modelProfiles: {
fast: {
adapterConfig: {
model: "gpt-5-mini",
},
},
},
},
});
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
});
});