forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
b7545823be
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies through issues, documents, runs, and durable company-scoped state. > - Issue documents are where agents and operators capture plans, handoffs, and work products. > - Before this change, document collaboration could only happen through whole-document edits and detached issue comments. > - Inline document annotations need stable anchors, revision-aware persistence, and UI affordances that do not break existing document editing. > - This pull request adds company-scoped document annotation threads, comments, anchor snapshots, API routes, and board UI. > - The benefit is that operators and agents can discuss specific document passages without losing context as documents evolve. ## What Changed - Added document annotation tables, schema exports, shared types, validators, anchor hashing, and text-anchor helpers. - Added server-side document annotation services and issue routes for listing, creating, commenting, resolving, and reopening annotation threads. - Included annotation summaries in relevant issue document reads and backup/recovery document workspace behavior. - Added React UI for inline document highlights, comment panels, mobile sheet behavior, deep-link focus, and resolved/open filtering. - Added annotation design artifacts, Storybook coverage, screenshots, and a screenshot helper script. - Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` and renumbered the annotation migration from `0085_old_swarm` to `0091_old_swarm`; the SQL uses `IF NOT EXISTS` guards so environments that previously applied the old migration number can safely apply the new one. - Adjusted the new annotation UI tests to use a local async flush helper because this workspace's React 19.2.4 export does not expose `React.act`. ## Verification - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/document-anchors.test.ts server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/document-annotations-service.test.ts ui/src/components/DocumentAnnotationLayer.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx ui/src/lib/document-annotation-hash.test.ts ui/src/lib/document-annotation-selection.test.ts` - Confirmed `git diff --check` passes. - Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*` files are included in the PR diff. ## Risks - Medium risk: this adds new persisted annotation tables and routes across db/shared/server/ui. - Migration risk is reduced by moving the branch migration to `0091_old_swarm` after upstream `0090_resource_memberships` and keeping the SQL idempotent for old `0085_old_swarm` adopters. - UI risk is mostly around text range anchoring and panel positioning across long documents, folded content, and mobile layouts; the PR includes focused unit coverage and design screenshots. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-using software engineering mode. Context window size is not exposed in this Paperclip runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
283 lines
9.1 KiB
TypeScript
283 lines
9.1 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
addComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
|
|
create: vi.fn(),
|
|
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
|
|
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
|
|
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
|
|
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockExecutionWorkspaceService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockFeedbackService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(),
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRun: vi.fn(),
|
|
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(),
|
|
cancelRun: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
|
|
|
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
function registerRouteMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/execution-workspaces.js", () => ({
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/feedback.js", () => ({
|
|
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
|
|
documentService: () => ({}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
|
|
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
|
|
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => ({
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
const [{ errorHandler }, { issueRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function makeIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1000",
|
|
title: "Workspace authz",
|
|
executionPolicy: null,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue workspace command authorization", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/agents.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/execution-workspaces.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/feedback.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
registerRouteMocks();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.create.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockIssueService.getByIdentifier.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
|
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
|
mockAgentService.getById.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockExecutionWorkspaceService.getById.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockFeedbackService.listIssueVotesForUser.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
vote: null,
|
|
consentEnabledNow: false,
|
|
sharingEnabled: false,
|
|
});
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent callers that create issue workspace provision commands", async () => {
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.post("/api/companies/company-1/issues")
|
|
.send({
|
|
title: "Exploit",
|
|
executionWorkspaceSettings: {
|
|
workspaceStrategy: {
|
|
type: "git_worktree",
|
|
provisionCommand: "touch /tmp/paperclip-rce",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("host-executed workspace commands");
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent callers that patch assignee adapter workspace teardown commands", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
|
|
const app = await createApp({
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app)
|
|
.patch("/api/issues/issue-1")
|
|
.send({
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
workspaceStrategy: {
|
|
type: "git_worktree",
|
|
teardownCommand: "rm -rf /tmp/paperclip-rce",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("host-executed workspace commands");
|
|
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|