Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/issue-activity-events-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta 9a8d219949 [codex] Stabilize tests and local maintenance assets (#4423)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - A fast-moving control plane needs stable local tests and repeatable
local maintenance tools so contributors can safely split and review work
> - Several route suites needed stronger isolation, Codex manual model
selection needed a faster-mode option, and local browser cleanup missed
Playwright's headless shell binary
> - Storybook static output also needed to be preserved as a generated
review artifact from the working branch
> - This pull request groups the test/local-dev maintenance pieces so
they can be reviewed separately from product runtime changes
> - The benefit is more predictable contributor verification and cleaner
local maintenance without mixing these changes into feature PRs

## What Changed

- Added stable Vitest runner support and serialized route/authz test
isolation.
- Fixed workspace runtime authz route mocks and stabilized
Claude/company-import related assertions.
- Allowed Codex fast mode for manually selected models.
- Broadened the agent browser cleanup script to detect
`chrome-headless-shell` as well as Chrome for Testing.
- Preserved generated Storybook static output from the source branch.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run
src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts
src/__tests__/claude-local-execute.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts`
from `server/` passed: 2 files, 19 tests.
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/server/codex-args.test.ts --config
vitest.config.ts` from `packages/adapters/codex-local/` passed: 1 file,
3 tests.
- `bash -n scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh &&
scripts/kill-agent-browsers.sh --dry` passed; dry-run detected
`chrome-headless-shell` processes without killing them.
- `test -f ui/storybook-static/index.html && test -f
ui/storybook-static/assets/forms-editors.stories-Dry7qwx2.js` passed.
- `git diff --check public-gh/master..pap-2228-test-local-maintenance --
. ':(exclude)ui/storybook-static'` passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts --config
cli/vitest.config.ts` did not complete in the isolated split worktree
because `paperclipai run` exited during build prep with `TS2688: Cannot
find type definition file for 'react'`; this appears to be caused by the
worktree dependency symlink setup, not the code under test.
- Confirmed this PR does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`.

## Risks

- Medium risk: the stable Vitest runner changes how route/authz tests
are scheduled.
- Generated `ui/storybook-static` files are large and contain minified
third-party output; `git diff --check` reports whitespace inside those
generated assets, so reviewers may choose to drop or regenerate that
artifact before merge.
- No database migrations.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, Paperclip
API, and GitHub CLI tool use in the local Paperclip workspace.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Note: screenshot checklist item is not applicable to source UI behavior;
the included Storybook static output is generated artifact preservation
from the source branch.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-24 15:11:42 -05:00

338 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy } from "../services/issue-execution-policy.ts";
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
addComment: vi.fn(),
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(async () => false),
hasPermission: vi.fn(async () => false),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockFeedbackService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
}));
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}));
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/feedback.js", () => ({
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
documentService: () => ({}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueReferenceService: () => ({
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
addedReferencedIssues: [],
removedReferencedIssues: [],
currentReferencedIssues: [],
}),
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
syncComment: async () => undefined,
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
}
async function createApp() {
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
function makeIssue() {
return {
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
status: "todo",
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
assigneeUserId: null,
createdByUserId: "local-board",
identifier: "PAP-580",
title: "Activity event issue",
executionPolicy: null,
executionState: null,
};
}
describe("issue activity event routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/feedback.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(false);
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(false);
mockFeedbackService.listIssueVotesForUser.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockResolvedValue({
vote: null,
consentEnabledNow: false,
sharingEnabled: false,
});
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
});
it("logs blocker activity with added and removed issue summaries", async () => {
const issue = makeIssue();
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
const previousRelations = {
blockedBy: [
{
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
identifier: "PAP-10",
title: "Old blocker",
status: "todo",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: null,
},
],
blocks: [],
};
const nextRelations = {
blockedBy: [
{
id: "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb",
identifier: "PAP-11",
title: "New blocker",
status: "todo",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: null,
},
],
blocks: [],
};
let relationLookupCount = 0;
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockImplementation(async () => {
relationLookupCount += 1;
return relationLookupCount === 1 ? previousRelations : nextRelations;
});
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}));
const res = await request(await createApp())
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ blockedByIssueIds: ["bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb"] });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
await vi.waitFor(() => {
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.blockers_updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({
addedBlockedByIssueIds: ["bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb"],
removedBlockedByIssueIds: ["aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa"],
addedBlockedByIssues: [
{
id: "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb",
identifier: "PAP-11",
title: "New blocker",
},
],
removedBlockedByIssues: [
{
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
identifier: "PAP-10",
title: "Old blocker",
},
],
}),
}),
);
});
}, 15_000);
it("logs explicit reviewer and approver activity when execution policy participants change", async () => {
const existingPolicy = normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy({
stages: [
{
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
type: "review",
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "11111111-2222-4333-8444-555555555555" }],
},
{
id: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
type: "approval",
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "66666666-7777-4888-8999-aaaaaaaaaaaa" }],
},
],
})!;
const nextPolicy = normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy({
stages: [
{
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
type: "review",
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff" }],
},
{
id: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
type: "approval",
participants: [{ type: "user", userId: "local-board" }],
},
],
})!;
const issue = {
...makeIssue(),
executionPolicy: existingPolicy,
};
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
...issue,
...patch,
executionPolicy: patch.executionPolicy,
updatedAt: new Date(),
}));
const res = await request(await createApp())
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
.send({ executionPolicy: nextPolicy });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
await vi.waitFor(() => {
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.reviewers_updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff", userId: null }],
addedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff", userId: null }],
removedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "11111111-2222-4333-8444-555555555555", userId: null }],
}),
}),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.approvers_updated",
details: expect.objectContaining({
participants: [{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" }],
addedParticipants: [{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" }],
removedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "66666666-7777-4888-8999-aaaaaaaaaaaa", userId: null }],
}),
}),
);
});
});
});