Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/issue-document-restore-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta 7f893ac4ec [codex] Harden execution reliability and heartbeat tooling (#3679)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - Reliable execution depends on heartbeat routing, issue lifecycle
semantics, telemetry, and a fast enough local verification loop to keep
regressions visible
> - The remaining commits on this branch were mostly server/runtime
correctness fixes plus test and documentation follow-ups in that area
> - Those changes are logically separate from the UI-focused
issue-detail and workspace/navigation branches even when they touch
overlapping issue APIs
> - This pull request groups the execution reliability, heartbeat,
telemetry, and tooling changes into one standalone branch
> - The benefit is a focused review of the control-plane correctness
work, including the follow-up fix that restored the implicit
comment-reopen helpers after branch splitting

## What Changed

- Hardened issue/heartbeat execution behavior, including self-review
stage skipping, deferred mention wakes during active execution, stranded
execution recovery, active-run scoping, assignee resolution, and
blocked-to-todo wake resumption
- Reduced noisy polling/logging overhead by trimming issue run payloads,
compacting persisted run logs, silencing high-volume request logs, and
capping heartbeat-run queries in dashboard/inbox surfaces
- Expanded telemetry and status semantics with adapter/model fields on
task completion plus clearer status guidance in docs/onboarding material
- Updated test infrastructure and verification defaults with faster
route-test module isolation, cheaper default `pnpm test`, e2e isolation
from local state, and repo verification follow-ups
- Included docs/release housekeeping from the branch and added a small
follow-up commit restoring the implicit comment-reopen helpers that were
dropped during branch reconstruction

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run
server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-telemetry-routes.test.ts`
- `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-log.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/health.test.ts`
- `server/src/__tests__/activity-service.test.ts`,
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-comment-wake-batching.test.ts`, and
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` were attempted
on this host but the embedded Postgres harness reported
init-script/data-dir problems and skipped or failed to start, so they
are noted as environment-limited

## Risks

- Medium: this branch changes core issue/heartbeat routing and
reopen/wakeup behavior, so regressions would affect agent execution flow
rather than isolated UI polish
- Because it also updates verification infrastructure, reviewers should
pay attention to whether the new tests are asserting the right failure
modes and not just reshaping harness behavior

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent (GPT-5-class runtime in Codex CLI; exact
deployed model ID is not exposed in this environment), reasoning
enabled, tool use and local code execution enabled

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-14 13:34:52 -05:00

213 lines
6.4 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const issueId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
const companyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockDocumentsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
listIssueDocumentRevisions: vi.fn(),
restoreIssueDocumentRevision: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => ({}),
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
getExperimental: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" })),
}),
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => ({}),
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
getExperimental: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" })),
}),
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
}
async function createApp() {
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "board-user",
companyIds: [companyId],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
describe("issue document revision routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.resetAllMocks();
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: issueId,
companyId,
identifier: "PAP-881",
title: "Document revisions",
status: "in_progress",
});
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocumentRevisions.mockResolvedValue([
{
id: "revision-2",
companyId,
documentId: "document-1",
issueId,
key: "plan",
revisionNumber: 2,
title: "Plan v2",
format: "markdown",
body: "# Two",
changeSummary: null,
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: "board-user",
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
},
]);
mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision.mockResolvedValue({
restoredFromRevisionId: "revision-1",
restoredFromRevisionNumber: 1,
document: {
id: "document-1",
companyId,
issueId,
key: "plan",
title: "Plan v1",
format: "markdown",
body: "# One",
latestRevisionId: "revision-3",
latestRevisionNumber: 3,
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: "board-user",
updatedByAgentId: null,
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
},
});
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
});
it("returns revision snapshots including title and format", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions`);
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toEqual([
expect.objectContaining({
revisionNumber: 2,
title: "Plan v2",
format: "markdown",
body: "# Two",
}),
]);
});
it("restores a revision through the append-only route and logs the action", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
issueId,
key: "plan",
revisionId: "revision-1",
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: "board-user",
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.document_restored",
details: expect.objectContaining({
key: "plan",
restoredFromRevisionId: "revision-1",
restoredFromRevisionNumber: 1,
revisionNumber: 3,
}),
}),
);
expect(res.body).toEqual(expect.objectContaining({
key: "plan",
title: "Plan v1",
latestRevisionNumber: 3,
}));
});
it("rejects invalid document keys before attempting restore", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/INVALID KEY/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
.send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(400);
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});