forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
b9a80dcf22
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies. > - V1 needs to stay local-first while also supporting shared, authenticated deployments. > - Human operators need real identities, company membership, invite flows, profile surfaces, and company-scoped access controls. > - Agents and operators also need the existing issue, inbox, workspace, approval, and plugin flows to keep working under those authenticated boundaries. > - This branch accumulated the multi-user implementation, follow-up QA fixes, workspace/runtime refinements, invite UX improvements, release-branch conflict resolution, and review hardening. > - This pull request consolidates that branch onto the current `master` branch as a single reviewable PR. > - The benefit is a complete multi-user implementation path with tests and docs carried forward without dropping existing branch work. ## What Changed - Added authenticated human-user access surfaces: auth/session routes, company user directory, profile settings, company access/member management, join requests, and invite management. - Added invite creation, invite landing, onboarding, logo/branding, invite grants, deduped join requests, and authenticated multi-user E2E coverage. - Tightened company-scoped and instance-admin authorization across board, plugin, adapter, access, issue, and workspace routes. - Added profile-image URL validation hardening, avatar preservation on name-only profile updates, and join-request uniqueness migration cleanup for pending human requests. - Added an atomic member role/status/grants update path so Company Access saves no longer leave partially updated permissions. - Improved issue chat, inbox, assignee identity rendering, sidebar/account/company navigation, workspace routing, and execution workspace reuse behavior for multi-user operation. - Added and updated server/UI tests covering auth, invites, membership, issue workspace inheritance, plugin authz, inbox/chat behavior, and multi-user flows. - Merged current `public-gh/master` into this branch, resolved all conflicts, and verified no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is included in this PR diff. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/access-validators.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/authz-company-access.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/sidebar-preferences-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts server/src/__tests__/openclaw-invite-prompt-route.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/auth-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/CompanyAccess.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm db:generate` - `npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts --list` - Confirmed branch has no uncommitted changes and is `0` commits behind `public-gh/master` before PR creation. - Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is staged or present in the PR diff. ## Risks - High review surface area: this PR contains the accumulated multi-user branch plus follow-up fixes, so reviewers should focus especially on company-boundary enforcement and authenticated-vs-local deployment behavior. - UI behavior changed across invites, inbox, issue chat, access settings, and sidebar navigation; no browser screenshots are included in this branch-consolidation PR. - Plugin install, upgrade, and lifecycle/config mutations now require instance-admin access, which is intentional but may change expectations for non-admin board users. - A join-request dedupe migration rejects duplicate pending human requests before creating unique indexes; deployments with unusual historical duplicates should review the migration behavior. - Company member role/status/grant saves now use a new combined endpoint; older separate endpoints remain for compatibility. - Full production build was not run locally in this heartbeat; CI should cover the full matrix. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5-based model, CLI/tool-use environment. Exact deployed model identifier and context window were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Note on screenshots: this is a branch-consolidation PR for an already-developed multi-user branch, and no browser screenshots were captured during this heartbeat. --------- Co-authored-by: dotta <dotta@example.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
147 lines
3.9 KiB
TypeScript
147 lines
3.9 KiB
TypeScript
import { Readable } from "node:stream";
|
|
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockStorage = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getObject: vi.fn(),
|
|
headObject: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../storage/index.js", () => ({
|
|
getStorageService: () => mockStorage,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
import { accessRoutes } from "../routes/access.js";
|
|
import { errorHandler } from "../middleware/index.js";
|
|
|
|
function createSelectChain(rows: unknown[]) {
|
|
const query = {
|
|
leftJoin() {
|
|
return query;
|
|
},
|
|
where() {
|
|
return Promise.resolve(rows);
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
return {
|
|
from() {
|
|
return query;
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function createDbStub(inviteRows: unknown[], companyRows: unknown[]) {
|
|
let selectCall = 0;
|
|
return {
|
|
select() {
|
|
selectCall += 1;
|
|
return selectCall === 1
|
|
? createSelectChain(inviteRows)
|
|
: createSelectChain(companyRows);
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function createApp(db: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = { type: "anon" };
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use(
|
|
"/api",
|
|
accessRoutes(db as any, {
|
|
deploymentMode: "local_trusted",
|
|
deploymentExposure: "private",
|
|
bindHost: "127.0.0.1",
|
|
allowedHostnames: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("GET /invites/:token/logo", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
mockStorage.getObject.mockReset();
|
|
mockStorage.headObject.mockReset();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("serves the company logo for an active invite without company auth", async () => {
|
|
const invite = {
|
|
id: "invite-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
inviteType: "company_join",
|
|
allowedJoinTypes: "human",
|
|
tokenHash: "hash",
|
|
defaultsPayload: null,
|
|
expiresAt: new Date("2027-03-07T00:10:00.000Z"),
|
|
invitedByUserId: null,
|
|
revokedAt: null,
|
|
acceptedAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-07T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-07T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
mockStorage.headObject.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
exists: true,
|
|
contentType: "image/png",
|
|
contentLength: 3,
|
|
});
|
|
mockStorage.getObject.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
contentType: "image/png",
|
|
contentLength: 3,
|
|
stream: Readable.from([Buffer.from("png")]),
|
|
});
|
|
const app = createApp(
|
|
createDbStub([invite], [{
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
objectKey: "assets/companies/logo-1",
|
|
contentType: "image/png",
|
|
byteSize: 3,
|
|
originalFilename: "logo.png",
|
|
}]),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).get("/api/invites/pcp_invite_test/logo");
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.headers["content-type"]).toContain("image/png");
|
|
expect(mockStorage.headObject).toHaveBeenCalledWith("company-1", "assets/companies/logo-1");
|
|
expect(mockStorage.getObject).toHaveBeenCalledWith("company-1", "assets/companies/logo-1");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns 404 when the logo asset record exists but storage does not", async () => {
|
|
const invite = {
|
|
id: "invite-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
inviteType: "company_join",
|
|
allowedJoinTypes: "human",
|
|
tokenHash: "hash",
|
|
defaultsPayload: null,
|
|
expiresAt: new Date("2027-03-07T00:10:00.000Z"),
|
|
invitedByUserId: null,
|
|
revokedAt: null,
|
|
acceptedAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-07T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-07T00:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
mockStorage.headObject.mockResolvedValue({ exists: false });
|
|
const app = createApp(
|
|
createDbStub([invite], [{
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
objectKey: "assets/companies/logo-1",
|
|
contentType: "image/png",
|
|
byteSize: 3,
|
|
originalFilename: "logo.png",
|
|
}]),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).get("/api/invites/pcp_invite_test/logo");
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(404);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toBe("Invite logo not found");
|
|
expect(mockStorage.getObject).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|