Three CONFIRMED defects, all from template/README text written before the
vo2max conflict section was revised, now reconciled with the corrected docs:
- README taper example said TSB '−5 to +5' (under-recovered) — corrected to
the doctrinal +5 to +15 that periodization.md and both plan templates use.
- plan-template-build.md VO2 prescription said 'bias toward longer reps
(3–5 min)... accumulate more time >90% VO2max than 30/30s' — contradicted
its own cited source and was self-contradictory (140s ≠ 3–5 min). Replaced
with the neutral menu: default medium (~2–4 min, near the ~140s optimum),
short/long by goal, 'no rep length proven superior in cycling.'
- plan-template-build.md cited the phantom 'Yu et al.' (marked ❌ NOT FOUND in
citations.md) — re-grounded the frequency heuristic in Seiler 2024.
DRY findings (inline PMID/DOI duplication, restated rhythm/field-test tables)
left as-is: inline citations and self-contained, independently-loadable docs
were explicit design requirements for this skill.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqrhBhC3GEcKyaw8RTk8G6
Chris Farhood
4e4f719670