Files
cycling-training/references/road-racing-demands.md
T
Chris Farhood cced0ea6b8 feat: add road-racing and TT demand docs (balance the MTB doc)
The skill had mtb-xco-demands.md but road/TT demands were only diffused
through the general docs — an asymmetry given the balanced MTB+road scope.
Add two dedicated, self-contained demand profiles (kept separate because
mass-start racing and TT differ as much as XCO differs from marathon MTB):

- references/road-racing-demands.md: stochastic power profile (Vogt 2007,
  Ebert 2005/2006, Sanders/van Erp 2021), drafting economics (Blocken 2018),
  fatigued finishing sprint (Menaspà 2013/2015, Etxebarria 2019), durability
  as a success determinant (van Erp/Sanders/Lamberts 2021); power governs, HR
  unreliable (intermittent) — mirrors the MTB doc.
- references/tt-demands.md: aero drag dominance + CdA as the top lever
  (Crouch 2017, Martin 1998, García-López 2008), critical power as predictor
  (Smith 1999), even-vs-variable pacing (Swain 1997, Atkinson 2007), long-TT
  durability (Maunder 2021); HR more usable than MTB but still secondary.

All new quantitative claims carry verified PMIDs/DOIs (verified via PubMed/
CrossRef); citations.md gains Road-racing and Time-trial sections. Honesty
flags: Blocken 2018 and Martin 1998 have no PMID (DOI only); the '~90% aero'
soundbite (Kyle & Burke 1984) is unverifiable and marked approximate;
criterium-specific literature flagged as a gap; no unverified HR-reliability
citation added (TT HR defers to data-confounds.md).

Router (SKILL.md) and README layout updated with both docs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TqrhBhC3GEcKyaw8RTk8G6
2026-07-20 21:05:15 -04:00

6.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Road-racing demands (mass-start: road races & criteriums)

Load this doc when: planning for a mass-start road race or criterium — any bunch event decided by positioning, surges, and a finish, rather than a steady solo effort.

Data/knowledge split: MCP gives you the power streams, record power profile, and load. This doc explains the demand profile — why road racing is stochastic, what wins it, and how to train for it.

Contrast with the other demand docs: a road race is the near-opposite of tt-demands.md. It is intermittent, stochastic, tactical, and drafting-dominated — structurally closer to XCO (mtb-xco-demands.md) than to a TT. Don't pace a road race like a TT; the winning move is a short supra-threshold effort off a variable base, not an even wattage.


The power profile: low mean, high variance, decisive surges

Mass-start road racing has a stochastic power-output profile — long stretches at modest power (sheltered in the bunch) punctuated by repeated short efforts above maximal aerobic power.

  • Across 148 Tour de France mass-start stages, mean power was only ~3.13.3 W/kg (218234 W) despite the racing being decided by far higher climb and attack efforts (Vogt et al. 2007, Int J Sports Med 28(9):756761; PMID 17497569; DOI 10.1055/s-2007-964982).
  • Professional tour racing showed relatively low mean power interspersed with multiple high-intensity surges above maximal aerobic power, varying by race type (Ebert et al. 2006, Int J Sports Physiol Perform 1(4):324335; PMID 19124890; DOI 10.1123/ijspp.1.4.324; women's World Cup: Ebert et al. 2005, Eur J Appl Physiol 95(56):529536; PMID 16151832; DOI 10.1007/s00421-005-0039-y).
  • Demands are strongly shaped by stage/race type and by result — flat stages load short-duration maximal mean power, mountain stages load sustained efforts; higher race category and better placings carry distinct intensity signatures (Sanders & van Erp 2021 review, Int J Sports Physiol Perform 16(1):312; PMID 33271501; DOI 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0508; van Erp & Sanders 2021, 2,920 files / 20 pros, Eur J Sport Sci 21(5):666677; PMID 32584197; DOI 10.1080/17461391.2020.1788651).

Training implication: average power under-describes a road race. Train the full record power profile — repeated 10 s5 min supra-threshold efforts off fatigue — not just steady threshold.

Drafting changes everything

Sitting in the bunch is not optional physics — it's the sport. In a tightly packed peloton, drag on riders mid-to-rear drops to roughly 510% of an isolated rider's (Blocken et al. 2018, J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 179:319337; DOI 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.06.011; no PMID — cite by DOI).

Implications:

  • Watts spent out of the draft (attacking, chasing, riding the front, wind-exposed) cost multiples of watts spent sheltered — positioning is a physiological lever, not just tactics.
  • The record that matters is what you can produce after hours of surge-and-soft-pedal, not fresh.

The finish: sprinting after a hard race

Most road races and criteriums are decided by a short, very high-power finish thrown after the race has already emptied the tank.

  • Professional road sprints reached peak power of ~17.4 ± 1.7 W/kg, and power/cadence/speed rose significantly in the final minutes before the sprint — the sprint is launched off a high-intensity lead-in, not from rest (Menaspà et al. 2015, Int J Sports Med 36(13):10581062; PMID 26252551; DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1554697; sprinter performance analysis: Menaspà, Abbiss & Martin 2013, Int J Sports Physiol Perform 8(3):336340; PMID 23038704; DOI 10.1123/ijspp.8.3.336).
  • Prior stochastic high-intensity cycling impairs the finishing sprint: ~1 h of variable cycling cut subsequent 30 s sprint peak and mean power by ~56% vs constant-power riding (Etxebarria et al. 2019, Front Physiol 10:100; PMID 30837886; DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00100) — directly relevant to criteriums and to any bunch finish.

Training implication: train sprints in a pre-fatigued state, not just fresh — the race-day sprint is a fatigued sprint. This pairs with the fatigued-state work in durability.md.

Durability decides who is there at the end

Maintaining maximal power after high accumulated work is a key determinant of success in pro racing: category-1 climbers and sprinters showed smaller declines in discipline-specific maximal mean power after heavy accumulated work than lesser riders (van Erp, Sanders & Lamberts 2021, Med Sci Sports Exerc 53(9):19031910; PMID 33731651; DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002656). This is the same durability quality profiled in durability.md (Muriel 2022; Spragg 2023) — in road racing it manifests as still having a sprint or a matching-move after 4 hours.

Criterium vs road race

Both are intermittent, but criteriums are shorter, more relentlessly repetitive (constant corner-surge-brake cycles, little true recovery), while road races add sustained climbs and longer selective efforts. The peer-reviewed criterium-specific literature is thin — the strongest indexed evidence is the intermittent-effort → impaired-sprint mechanism above (Etxebarria 2019); much criterium-vs-road detail lives in reviews (Sanders & van Erp 2021) rather than dedicated studies.

⚠️ Gap flag: treat criterium-specific numbers as under-documented; reason from the intermittent-effort principles here and verify against the athlete's own race files via MCP.

HR is unreliable here — power governs

Like MTB (mtb-xco-demands.md), road racing is intermittent: HR lags the surges that decide the race and drifts over hours. Prescribe and read intensity from power; use HR only for steady sections and recovery trends, screened for the confounds in data-confounds.md.

Practical emphasis (reason here, pull data from MCP)

  • Repeatability of supra-threshold efforts — train repeated 30 s5 min efforts off fatigue
  • Fatigued sprint — practice the finish pre-tired, not just fresh (Etxebarria 2019)
  • Durability — hold power after accumulated kJ (durability.md; van Erp 2021)
  • Positioning treated as an energy-saving skill (Blocken 2018), not an afterthought
  • Judge intensity by power, not HR (data-confounds.md)