[codex] Add resource membership controls (#6677)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies through company-scoped
issues, projects, agents, and board-visible workflows.
> - The board sidebar and project list are the daily navigation surface
for that control plane.
> - Users need to keep all projects and agents accessible while hiding
resources they have intentionally left from their own sidebar.
> - That requires user-scoped resource membership state backed by
company-scoped API and database contracts.
> - The branch also needed to preserve HTTP worktree login sessions and
keep the project list easier to scan after membership grouping.
> - This pull request adds resource membership controls, sidebar leave
actions, grouped/sortable project listings, and focused tests.
> - The benefit is a cleaner personal workspace view without weakening
company-scoped access to the underlying project or agent detail pages.

## What Changed

- Added `project_memberships` and `agent_memberships` tables with
API/shared/server contracts for current-user join/leave state.
- Renumbered the membership migration to `0090_resource_memberships`
after rebasing onto current `master`, and made it idempotent for anyone
who had applied the old branch-local `0087` migration.
- Added project and agent sidebar leave actions, plus list filtering
that waits for membership state before hiding resources.
- Added grouped project listing, project sorting controls, and reserved
row subtitle height for cleaner scanning.
- Fixed HTTP auth cookie security handling so HTTP worktree sessions can
persist.
- Updated focused server and UI tests for the new membership, sidebar,
project list, and auth behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/better-auth.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/resource-memberships-routes.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Projects.test.tsx
ui/src/components/SidebarProjects.test.tsx
ui/src/components/SidebarAgents.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MembershipAction.test.tsx
ui/src/components/EntityRow.test.tsx`
- Confirmed the branch is rebased on current `origin/master`.
- Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or
`.github/workflows` changes.

## Risks

- Migration safety: low to medium. The migration now uses `IF NOT
EXISTS` / guarded constraints and is numbered after current master
migrations, but it should still get CI coverage against fresh databases.
- UI behavior: low. Left resources are hidden from sidebar only after
membership state loads; direct detail access remains available.
- Auth behavior: low. Cookie security is relaxed only for HTTP/private
local-style origins where secure cookies would prevent login
persistence.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent, tool-enabled shell/git workflow,
context window not exposed by runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Screenshot note: no browser screenshots were captured in this heartbeat;
the UI changes are covered by focused component tests above.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

ui/src/pages/ProjectDetail.test.tsx

@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
 
 import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from "@tanstack/react-query";
 import type { Project } from "@paperclipai/shared";
-import { act, type ReactNode } from "react";
+import type { ReactNode } from "react";
+import { flushSync } from "react-dom";
 import { createRoot, type Root } from "react-dom/client";
 import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
 import { ProjectDetail } from "./ProjectDetail";
@@ -24,6 +25,10 @@ const mockBudgetsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({ overview: vi.fn(), upsertPolicy: vi.f
 const mockExecutionWorkspacesApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({ list: vi.fn() }));
 const mockInstanceSettingsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({ getExperimental: vi.fn() }));
 const mockAssetsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({ uploadImage: vi.fn() }));
+const mockResourceMembershipsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
+  listMine: vi.fn(),
+  updateProject: vi.fn(),
+}));
 const mockNavigate = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
 const mockSetBreadcrumbs = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
 const mockIssuesList = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
@@ -36,6 +41,7 @@ vi.mock("../api/budgets", () => ({ budgetsApi: mockBudgetsApi }));
 vi.mock("../api/execution-workspaces", () => ({ executionWorkspacesApi: mockExecutionWorkspacesApi }));
 vi.mock("../api/instanceSettings", () => ({ instanceSettingsApi: mockInstanceSettingsApi }));
 vi.mock("../api/assets", () => ({ assetsApi: mockAssetsApi }));
+vi.mock("../api/resourceMemberships", () => ({ resourceMembershipsApi: mockResourceMembershipsApi }));
 
 vi.mock("@/lib/router", () => ({
   Link: ({ children, to }: { children?: ReactNode; to: string }) => <a href={to}>{children}</a>,
@@ -87,6 +93,14 @@ vi.mock("../components/IssuesList", () => ({
   },
 }));
 
+async function act(callback: () => void | Promise<void>) {
+  let result: void | Promise<void> = undefined;
+  flushSync(() => {
+    result = callback();
+  });
+  await result;
+}
+
 function project(overrides: Partial<Project> = {}): Project {
   const now = new Date("2026-05-01T00:00:00Z");
   return {
@@ -152,10 +166,21 @@ describe("ProjectDetail", () => {
     mockBudgetsApi.overview.mockResolvedValue({ policies: [] });
     mockInstanceSettingsApi.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: false });
     mockExecutionWorkspacesApi.list.mockResolvedValue([]);
+    mockResourceMembershipsApi.listMine.mockResolvedValue({
+      projectMemberships: {},
+      agentMemberships: {},
+      updatedAt: null,
+    });
+    mockResourceMembershipsApi.updateProject.mockResolvedValue({
+      resourceType: "project",
+      resourceId: "project-1",
+      state: "left",
+      updatedAt: new Date("2026-05-01T00:00:00Z"),
+    });
   });
 
-  afterEach(() => {
-    act(() => root?.unmount());
+  afterEach(async () => {
+    await act(() => root?.unmount());
     root = null;
     container.remove();
     vi.clearAllMocks();