[codex] Roll up May 17 branch changes (#6210)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, so agent work needs visible ownership, recovery, and operator controls. > - This local branch had accumulated several related control-plane reliability and operator-experience fixes across recovery actions, watchdog folding, model-profile defaults, mentions, markdown editing, plugin launchers, and small UI polish. > - The branch needed to be converted into a PR against the current `origin/master` without losing dirty work or including lockfile/workflow churn. > - The safest standalone shape is a single rollup PR because the recovery/server/UI files overlap heavily across the local commits and splitting would create avoidable conflicts. > - This pull request replays the local branch onto latest `origin/master`, preserves the uncommitted work as logical commits, and adds a Zod 4 validator compatibility fix found during verification. > - The benefit is that the May 17 local branch can be reviewed and merged as one coherent, conflict-free branch under the 100-file Greptile limit. ## What Changed - Rebased the local May 17 branch work onto current `origin/master` in a dedicated worktree. - Preserved and committed previously dirty changes for recovery retry handling, plugin/sidebar launcher polish, and `.herenow` ignores. - Added recovery-action behavior for returning source issues to `todo` when retrying source-scoped recovery. - Included the existing local recovery/liveness/watchdog fold, Codex cheap-profile, markdown/mention, duplicate-agent, and UI polish commits from the branch. - Normalized shared validator `z.record(...)` schemas to explicit string-key records for Zod 4 compatibility. - Confirmed the PR has no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*` changes and stays below the 100-file Greptile limit. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` - `npm run install` in `node_modules/.pnpm/sqlite3@5.1.7/node_modules/sqlite3` to build the local native sqlite3 binding after installing with scripts disabled - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts packages/shared/src/project-mentions.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-local-folders.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx ui/src/lib/duplicate-agent-payload.test.ts ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx` - First pass: 13 files passed with 201 passing tests; 3 server files failed before sqlite3 native binding was built. - After rebuilding sqlite3: `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts` passed/loaded; embedded Postgres tests were skipped by the local host guard. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` ## Risks - Medium risk: this is a broad rollup PR across recovery semantics, server tests, shared validators, and UI surfaces. - Some embedded Postgres tests skipped locally due the host guard, so CI should provide the stronger database-backed signal. - UI changes were covered by component tests, but no browser screenshot was captured in this PR creation pass. - This branch may overlap with existing recovery/liveness PR work; merge this PR independently or restack/close overlapping branches rather than merging duplicate implementations together. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled local repository and GitHub workflow, medium reasoning effort. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ function createIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
||||
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
||||
companyId: "company-1",
|
||||
status: "in_progress",
|
||||
workMode: "standard",
|
||||
priority: "medium",
|
||||
projectId: null,
|
||||
goalId: null,
|
||||
@@ -481,6 +482,57 @@ describe.sequential("issue thread interaction routes", () => {
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("forces a fresh workspace-aware session when accepting a planning confirmation", async () => {
|
||||
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValueOnce(createIssue({ workMode: "planning" }));
|
||||
mockInteractionService.acceptInteraction.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
||||
interaction: {
|
||||
id: "interaction-plan",
|
||||
companyId: "company-1",
|
||||
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
||||
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
||||
status: "accepted",
|
||||
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
|
||||
idempotencyKey: "confirmation:issue:plan:revision",
|
||||
sourceCommentId: null,
|
||||
sourceRunId: "run-plan",
|
||||
payload: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
prompt: "Approve this plan?",
|
||||
},
|
||||
result: {
|
||||
version: 1,
|
||||
outcome: "accepted",
|
||||
},
|
||||
createdAt: "2026-04-20T12:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
updatedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
||||
resolvedAt: "2026-04-20T12:05:00.000Z",
|
||||
},
|
||||
createdIssues: [],
|
||||
});
|
||||
const app = await createApp();
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await request(app)
|
||||
.post("/api/issues/aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa/interactions/interaction-plan/accept")
|
||||
.send({});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
||||
expect(mockHeartbeatService.wakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
ASSIGNEE_AGENT_ID,
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
reason: "issue_commented",
|
||||
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
issueId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
||||
interactionId: "interaction-plan",
|
||||
interactionKind: "request_confirmation",
|
||||
interactionStatus: "accepted",
|
||||
forceFreshSession: true,
|
||||
workspaceRefreshReason: "accepted_plan_confirmation",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("wakes the returned agent when accepting an agent-authored confirmation from a board review assignee", async () => {
|
||||
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValueOnce(createIssue({
|
||||
status: "in_review",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user