[codex] Bundle local branch fixes from PAP-10032 (#6604)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - This branch accumulated multiple already-tested control-plane, adapter runtime, invite, workspace, plugin, and UI quality fixes on the primary Paperclip checkout. > - `origin/master` advanced while those commits were still local, so the branch needed to be preserved and reconciled before review. > - Splitting the branch commit-by-commit against the new base produced overlapping conflicts with recently merged upstream PRs. > - This pull request keeps the remaining branch as one standalone PR because the final diff is 38 files after removing screenshot artifacts, under Greptile's 100-file cap, and can be merged independently after review. > - The benefit is that none of the local work is lost, the branch is now based on current `origin/master`, and reviewers can evaluate the reconciled changes in one place. ## What Changed - Merged the local accumulated branch with current `origin/master` and resolved the invite-flow overlaps from the newer upstream companies query helper. - Preserved the local fixes for invite existing-member behavior, invite link copy fallback, reusable workspace selection, worktree auth, static SPA fallback, markdown wrapping, plugin slot registration, cloud upstream UX/server polish, project sorting, and related tests. - Removed screenshot artifacts from the PR per review request. - Kept the PR under the requested file limit: 38 files changed, with no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*` changes. ## Verification - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/CompanyInvites.test.tsx ui/src/pages/InviteLanding.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Projects.test.tsx ui/src/plugins/slots.test.ts ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/invite-accept-existing-member.test.ts server/src/__tests__/static-index-html.test.ts server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/better-auth.test.ts server/src/__tests__/worktree-config.test.ts` - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `NODE_ENV=test pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - Confirmed `git diff --name-only origin/master...HEAD | wc -l` is `38`. - Confirmed no PR diff entries match `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows/*`, or `screenshots/*`. ## Risks - Medium review risk because this is a bundled rescue PR rather than several narrow feature PRs. - Invite flow and company cache behavior overlapped with newer upstream changes; the merge resolution intentionally keeps the shared `companiesListQueryOptions` helper while preserving local existing-member invite behavior. - Visual review evidence is no longer attached in-repo because screenshots were removed from this PR per review request. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, with repository tool access, terminal execution, and git/GitHub CLI operations. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] UI screenshots were intentionally removed from this PR per review request - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: CodexCoder <codexcoder@paperclip.local>
This commit is contained in:
Dotta
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
|
||||
// @vitest-environment jsdom
|
||||
|
||||
import { act } from "react";
|
||||
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
|
||||
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from "@tanstack/react-query";
|
||||
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
@@ -10,10 +9,10 @@ const sidebarNavItemMock = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
const mockSidebarBadgesApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
get: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
const mockUsePluginSlots = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
const mockInstanceSettingsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
||||
getExperimental: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
const mockUsePluginSlots = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@/lib/router", () => ({
|
||||
Link: ({
|
||||
@@ -65,22 +64,28 @@ vi.mock("@/api/sidebarBadges", () => ({
|
||||
sidebarBadgesApi: mockSidebarBadgesApi,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@/plugins/slots", () => ({
|
||||
usePluginSlots: mockUsePluginSlots,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@/api/instanceSettings", () => ({
|
||||
instanceSettingsApi: mockInstanceSettingsApi,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@/plugins/slots", () => ({
|
||||
usePluginSlots: mockUsePluginSlots,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
(globalThis as any).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
|
||||
|
||||
async function act(callback: () => void | Promise<void>) {
|
||||
await callback();
|
||||
await Promise.resolve();
|
||||
await new Promise((resolve) => window.setTimeout(resolve, 0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function flushReact() {
|
||||
await act(async () => {
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i += 1) {
|
||||
await Promise.resolve();
|
||||
await new Promise((resolve) => window.setTimeout(resolve, 0));
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
describe("CompanySettingsSidebar", () => {
|
||||
@@ -95,6 +100,9 @@ describe("CompanySettingsSidebar", () => {
|
||||
failedRuns: 0,
|
||||
joinRequests: 2,
|
||||
});
|
||||
mockInstanceSettingsApi.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
enableCloudSync: false,
|
||||
});
|
||||
mockUsePluginSlots.mockReturnValue({
|
||||
slots: [],
|
||||
isLoading: false,
|
||||
@@ -130,6 +138,7 @@ describe("CompanySettingsSidebar", () => {
|
||||
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Company Settings");
|
||||
expect(container.textContent).toContain("General");
|
||||
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Environments");
|
||||
expect(container.textContent).not.toContain("Cloud upstream");
|
||||
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Members");
|
||||
expect(container.textContent).not.toContain("Cloud upstream");
|
||||
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Invites");
|
||||
@@ -176,6 +185,38 @@ describe("CompanySettingsSidebar", () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("shows cloud upstream only when cloud sync is enabled", async () => {
|
||||
mockInstanceSettingsApi.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
enableCloudSync: true,
|
||||
});
|
||||
const root = createRoot(container);
|
||||
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
|
||||
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await act(async () => {
|
||||
root.render(
|
||||
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
|
||||
<CompanySettingsSidebar />
|
||||
</QueryClientProvider>,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
await flushReact();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(container.textContent).toContain("Cloud upstream");
|
||||
expect(sidebarNavItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
to: "/company/settings/cloud-upstream",
|
||||
label: "Cloud upstream",
|
||||
end: true,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
await act(async () => {
|
||||
root.unmount();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("renders company settings pages contributed by ready plugins", async () => {
|
||||
mockUsePluginSlots.mockReturnValue({
|
||||
slots: [
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user