1991ec9d6f
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, so backend task ownership, recovery, review visibility, and company-scoped limits need to stay enforceable without UI-only coupling. > - Closed PR #4692 bundled those backend changes with UI workflow, docs, skills, workflow, and lockfile churn. > - PAP-2694 asks for a clean backend/control-plane slice from that closed branch. > - This branch starts from current `master` and mines only the `cli`, `packages/db`, `packages/shared`, and `server` contracts/tests needed for the backend behavior. > - It explicitly excludes UI workflow/performance work, `.github/workflows/pr.yml`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, docs, skills, package-script, adapter UI build-config, and perf fixture script changes; the only UI files are fixture/test updates required by the tightened shared `Company` contract. > - The benefit is a smaller reviewable PR that preserves the control-plane fixes while staying under Greptile s 100-file review limit. ## What Changed - Added company-scoped attachment-size limits through DB schema/migrations, shared company portability contracts, CLI import/export coverage, and server attachment upload enforcement. - Added productivity review service/API behavior for no-comment streak, long-active, and high-churn review issues, including request-depth clamping and issue summary exposure. - Hardened issue ownership and recovery/control-plane paths: peer-agent mutation denial, issue tree pause/resume behavior, stranded recovery origins, and related activity/test coverage. - Preserved related backend contract updates for routine timestamp variables and managed agent instruction bundles because they live in shared/server contracts from the source branch. - Addressed Greptile feedback by making `Company.attachmentMaxBytes` non-optional, simplifying review request-depth clamping, fixing the migration final newline, and enforcing the process-level attachment cap as the final ceiling for uploads. - Added minimal company fixtures needed for repo-wide typecheck/build and kept the PR to 66 changed files with forbidden/non-slice paths excluded. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` - `git diff --name-only origin/master..HEAD | wc -l` -> 66 files - `git diff --name-only origin/master..HEAD -- .github/workflows/pr.yml pnpm-lock.yaml package.json doc skills .agents scripts packages/adapters` -> no output - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts packages/shared/src/routine-variables.test.ts packages/shared/src/adapter-types.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company.test.ts server/src/__tests__/productivity-review-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-control-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-control-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-attachment-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts` -> 12 files, 147 tests passed - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-delete.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts server/src/__tests__/productivity-review-service.test.ts` -> 3 files, 18 tests passed - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-attachment-routes.test.ts` -> 1 file, 6 tests passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter paperclipai typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` ## Risks - Includes migrations `0073_shiny_salo.sql` and `0074_striped_genesis.sql`; merge ordering matters if another PR adds migrations first. - This is intentionally backend-only apart from fixture/test updates forced by shared type correctness; UI affordances from PR #4692 are not present here and should land in separate UI slices. - The worktree install emitted plugin SDK bin-link warnings for unbuilt plugin packages, but the targeted tests and package typechecks completed successfully. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected; check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled terminal/GitHub workflow. Exact runtime context window was not exposed by the harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
268 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript
268 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockWakeup = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getAncestors: vi.fn(),
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
getComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
getCommentCursor: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
|
|
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
|
|
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
agentService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
documentService: () => ({
|
|
getIssueDocumentPayload: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
|
|
}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
feedbackService: () => ({}),
|
|
goalService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getDefaultCompanyGoal: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
|
wakeup: mockWakeup,
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}),
|
|
getIssueContinuationSummaryDocument: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
projectService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
listByIds: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
routineService: () => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}),
|
|
workProductService: () => ({
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
async function createApp() {
|
|
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
};
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue dependency wakeups in issue routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.getAncestors.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getComment.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.getCommentCursor.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
totalComments: 0,
|
|
latestCommentId: null,
|
|
latestCommentAt: null,
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("wakes dependents when the final blocker transitions to done", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "Finish blocker",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "blocked",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "Finish blocker",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "issue-2",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-2",
|
|
blockerIssueIds: ["issue-1", "issue-3"],
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).patch("/api/issues/issue-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"agent-2",
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
reason: "issue_blockers_resolved",
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
issueId: "issue-2",
|
|
resolvedBlockerIssueId: "issue-1",
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("wakes the parent when all direct children become terminal", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-9",
|
|
childIssueIds: ["child-0", "child-1"],
|
|
childIssueSummaries: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "child-0",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "First child",
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-18T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
summary: "First child finished.",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-18T12:05:00.000Z"),
|
|
summary: "Last child finished.",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
childIssueSummaryTruncated: false,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).patch("/api/issues/child-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"agent-9",
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
reason: "issue_children_completed",
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
issueId: "parent-1",
|
|
completedChildIssueId: "child-1",
|
|
childIssueSummaries: expect.arrayContaining([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ identifier: "PAP-101", summary: "Last child finished." }),
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
childIssueSummaries: expect.arrayContaining([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ identifier: "PAP-100", summary: "First child finished." }),
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|