Files
paperclip/packages/skills-catalog/catalog/bundled/paperclip-operations/issue-triage/SKILL.md
T
Dotta 9eac727cf1 [codex] Add skills CLI and catalog management (#6782)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies through
company-scoped control-plane workflows.
> - Agents need reusable, inspectable skills that can be installed,
reset, audited, exported, and assigned without bespoke local setup.
> - The existing skill truth model needed cleanup so bundled skills,
optional catalog skills, runtime skills, and adapter-provided skills
have clear provenance.
> - Operators also need a practical CLI and board UI for discovering and
managing company skills.
> - This pull request adds the skills CLI, packaged skills catalog,
company skills APIs, and catalog-aware board UI.
> - The benefit is a more reusable Paperclip company setup where skills
are portable, auditable, and easier for operators and agents to manage.

## What Changed

- Added `paperclipai skills` CLI commands and coverage for catalog
listing, installing, resetting, and inspecting company skills.
- Added a packaged `@paperclipai/skills-catalog` workspace with bundled
and optional skill content plus validation/build tests.
- Added shared company-skill types and validators used across CLI,
server, and UI contracts.
- Added server catalog APIs/services for company skill catalog
operations, reset semantics, audit behavior, and portability provenance.
- Updated adapter skill handling so runtime/catalog provenance remains
explicit across local adapters.
- Added board UI support for browsing and managing catalog-backed
company skills.
- Updated docs for the skills CLI/catalog flow and the company skills
Paperclip skill reference.
- Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip:master`; no
`pnpm-lock.yaml`, `.github/workflows`, or migration files are included
in the final PR diff.

## Verification

- Passed: `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
cli/src/__tests__/skills.test.ts
packages/skills-catalog/src/catalog-builder.test.ts
packages/skills-catalog/src/shipped-catalog.test.ts
packages/shared/src/validators/company-skill.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/plugins/create-paperclip-plugin/src/entrypoints.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-skills-catalog-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-skills-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts`.
- Passed: `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts -t "default
branch|origin/master|symbolic-ref"`.
- Attempted: full `server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts`. Four
provisioning tests failed while seeding an isolated worktree database
from the local Paperclip instance because the local plugin schema dump
contains a duplicate-column foreign key
(`plugin_content_machine_18a7bc327b.content_case_signals`). The
default-branch tests touched by the rebase conflict passed in the
focused run above.
- Checked final diff: no `pnpm-lock.yaml`, no `.github/workflows`, and
no migration-file changes relative to `master`.

## Risks

- Medium: this is a broad skills/catalog change touching CLI, server
APIs, shared contracts, adapter skill sync, and UI.
- Catalog validation and reset semantics need careful reviewer attention
because they affect reusable company setup and portability.
- No database migrations are included in this PR, so there is no
migration ordering/idempotency risk in the final diff.
- No lockfile is included by design; dependency resolution will be
handled by the repository lockfile workflow.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, running in Paperclip via the
`codex_local` adapter with shell, git, GitHub CLI, and code-editing tool
access. Exact hosted model build/context-window metadata is not exposed
in this runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run targeted tests locally and documented the local
workspace-runtime seed failure above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, screenshots were intentionally
omitted per PAP-10124 instructions; UI behavior is covered by tests and
reviewer inspection
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-28 07:33:51 -10:00

3.9 KiB

name, description, key, recommendedForRoles, tags
name description key recommendedForRoles tags
issue-triage Triage Paperclip inbox issues that are stale, blocked, in-review, or assigned-but-not-progressing, and decide a single next action per issue (resume, reassign, unblock, escalate, or close). paperclipai/bundled/paperclip-operations/issue-triage
manager
ceo
engineer
paperclip
triage
inbox
workflow

Issue Triage

Convert a noisy inbox into a small set of clear next actions. Each pass through this skill should leave every touched issue with a defined owner, status, and the single concrete action that will move it forward.

When to use

  • Daily or shift-start review of in_progress, in_review, and blocked assignments.
  • An inbox has many open assignments and no clear priority.
  • A manager wants a status read on their reports without asking each agent.
  • You are woken by a comment that suggests an old issue stalled.

When not to use

  • You are checked out on one specific issue and the wake context names it. Work that issue, do not triage the whole inbox.
  • An issue thread already has an open request_confirmation or ask_user_questions. Wait for the response — re-triage is noise.

Inputs

  • GET /api/agents/me/inbox-lite for the compact assignment list.
  • For each candidate issue, GET /api/issues/{issueId}/heartbeat-context for compact state including blockerAttention, executionState, ancestors, and commentCursor.
  • Only fall back to the full thread when the heartbeat context is not enough.

Per-issue triage decision

For each issue, classify into exactly one of:

  1. Resume — execution path is alive. Confirm the assignee is set and let the heartbeat continue. Do not comment.
  2. Wake-needed — assignee is stalled with no live continuation. Post one comment that names the blocker resolution or the exact next action, then leave in_progress or move to todo so the assignee picks it up.
  3. Reassign — the assignee is not the right specialty. Reassign and set in_review only if the new assignee is human, otherwise leave in_progress.
  4. Unblock — a first-class blockedByIssueIds entry is now done or cancelled. If cancelled, replace or remove it from blockedByIssueIds. The blockers-resolved wake will fire automatically when all are done.
  5. Escalate — the issue needs board, CTO, or user input. Create a request_confirmation, ask_user_questions, or request_board_approval and set the issue to in_review.
  6. Close — work is complete, duplicate, or no longer relevant. Set done or cancelled with a one-line reason.

If you cannot classify in under a minute of reading, escalate rather than guess.

Stuck-state heuristics

  • in_progress with no comments or document updates in the last 24h and no monitor or queued continuation → wake-needed.
  • in_review with no reviewer participant, no pending interaction, no approval — invalid review path → reassign to a real reviewer or move to todo.
  • blocked with no blockedByIssueIds, only free-text "blocked by X" → convert to first-class blockers or move to todo with a named action.
  • blocked with all blockers done → unblock the issue by setting status back; the assignee will wake.
  • Child issues all complete but parent still in_progress → confirm parent acceptance, then close.

Don't-do list

  • Do not @-mention agents during triage; mentions cost budget. Use direct reassignment instead.
  • Do not re-comment on a blocked issue if your most recent comment was also a blocked update with no reply since.
  • Do not cancel cross-team issues. Reassign to the responsible manager with a comment.
  • Do not change status without a comment that explains the change.

Output of a triage pass

A short comment chain or summary message that lists, per issue touched:

  • Issue id and title.
  • Verdict (resume / wake-needed / reassign / unblock / escalate / close).
  • The one action you took or asked for.

This is the bar for "the triage is done."