Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/cli-auth-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta a957394420 [codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals,
and the board UI.
> - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not
hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals.
> - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native
surface for proposed tasks and questions.
> - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations,
richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers.
> - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become
explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue
workflow.

## What Changed

- Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks,
structured questions, and request confirmations.
- Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question
answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows.
- Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from
agents/plugins.
- Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill
docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for
issue-scoped decisions.
- Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch
migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD
COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users.

## Verification

- `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts
packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79
tests passed
- `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration
numbering check

## Risks

- Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across
db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces.
- Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master
migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add
idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering.
- UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR
does not include browser screenshots.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and
context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local
shell/code execution were enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-21 20:15:11 -05:00

290 lines
9.0 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
isInstanceAdmin: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
canUser: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockBoardAuthService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
createCliAuthChallenge: vi.fn(),
describeCliAuthChallenge: vi.fn(),
approveCliAuthChallenge: vi.fn(),
cancelCliAuthChallenge: vi.fn(),
resolveBoardAccess: vi.fn(),
resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
assertCurrentBoardKey: vi.fn(),
revokeBoardApiKey: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
boardAuthService: () => mockBoardAuthService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
notifyHireApproved: vi.fn(),
deduplicateAgentName: vi.fn((name: string) => name),
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../routes/authz.js", async () => vi.importActual("../routes/authz.js"));
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
boardAuthService: () => mockBoardAuthService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
notifyHireApproved: vi.fn(),
deduplicateAgentName: vi.fn((name: string) => name),
}));
}
async function createApp(actor: any, db: any = {} as any) {
const [{ accessRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/access.js")>("../routes/access.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
req.actor = actor;
next();
});
app.use(
"/api",
accessRoutes(db, {
deploymentMode: "authenticated",
deploymentExposure: "private",
bindHost: "127.0.0.1",
allowedHostnames: [],
}),
);
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
describe("cli auth routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/access.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.resetAllMocks();
});
it("creates a CLI auth challenge with approval metadata", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.createCliAuthChallenge.mockResolvedValue({
challenge: {
id: "challenge-1",
expiresAt: new Date("2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z"),
},
challengeSecret: "pcp_cli_auth_secret",
pendingBoardToken: "pcp_board_token",
});
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" });
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/cli-auth/challenges")
.send({
command: "paperclipai company import",
clientName: "paperclipai cli",
requestedAccess: "board",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
id: "challenge-1",
token: "pcp_cli_auth_secret",
approvalPath: "/cli-auth/challenge-1?token=pcp_cli_auth_secret",
pollPath: "/cli-auth/challenges/challenge-1",
expiresAt: "2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z",
});
expect(res.body.boardApiToken).toBe("pcp_board_token");
expect(res.body.approvalUrl).toContain("/cli-auth/challenge-1?token=pcp_cli_auth_secret");
});
it("rejects anonymous access to generic skill documents", async () => {
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" });
const [indexRes, skillRes] = await Promise.all([
request(app).get("/api/skills/index"),
request(app).get("/api/skills/paperclip"),
]);
expect(indexRes.status).toBe(401);
expect(skillRes.status).toBe(401);
});
it("serves the invite-scoped paperclip skill anonymously for active invites", async () => {
const invite = {
id: "invite-1",
companyId: "company-1",
inviteType: "company_join",
allowedJoinTypes: "agent",
tokenHash: "hash",
defaultsPayload: null,
expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 60_000),
invitedByUserId: null,
revokedAt: null,
acceptedAt: null,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
};
const db = {
select: vi.fn(() => ({
from: vi.fn(() => ({
where: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([invite]),
})),
})),
};
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" }, db);
const res = await request(app).get("/api/invites/token-123/skills/paperclip");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.headers["content-type"]).toContain("text/markdown");
expect(res.text).toContain("# Paperclip Skill");
});
it("marks challenge status as requiring sign-in for anonymous viewers", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.describeCliAuthChallenge.mockResolvedValue({
id: "challenge-1",
status: "pending",
command: "paperclipai company import",
clientName: "paperclipai cli",
requestedAccess: "board",
requestedCompanyId: null,
requestedCompanyName: null,
approvedAt: null,
cancelledAt: null,
expiresAt: "2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z",
approvedByUser: null,
});
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" });
const res = await request(app).get("/api/cli-auth/challenges/challenge-1?token=pcp_cli_auth_secret");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body.requiresSignIn).toBe(true);
expect(res.body.canApprove).toBe(false);
});
it("approves a CLI auth challenge for a signed-in board user", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.approveCliAuthChallenge.mockResolvedValue({
status: "approved",
challenge: {
id: "challenge-1",
boardApiKeyId: "board-key-1",
requestedAccess: "board",
requestedCompanyId: "company-1",
expiresAt: new Date("2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z"),
},
});
mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardAccess.mockResolvedValue({
user: { id: "user-1", name: "User One", email: "user@example.com" },
companyIds: ["company-1"],
isInstanceAdmin: false,
});
mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/cli-auth/challenges/challenge-1/approve")
.send({ token: "pcp_cli_auth_secret" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockBoardAuthService.approveCliAuthChallenge).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"challenge-1",
"pcp_cli_auth_secret",
"user-1",
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
companyId: "company-1",
action: "board_api_key.created",
}),
);
});
it("logs approve activity for instance admins without company memberships", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.approveCliAuthChallenge.mockResolvedValue({
status: "approved",
challenge: {
id: "challenge-2",
boardApiKeyId: "board-key-2",
requestedAccess: "instance_admin_required",
requestedCompanyId: null,
expiresAt: new Date("2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z"),
},
});
mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-a", "company-b"]);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "admin-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
companyIds: [],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/cli-auth/challenges/challenge-2/approve")
.send({ token: "pcp_cli_auth_secret" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
userId: "admin-1",
requestedCompanyId: null,
boardApiKeyId: "board-key-2",
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
it("logs revoke activity with resolved audit company ids", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.assertCurrentBoardKey.mockResolvedValue({
id: "board-key-3",
userId: "admin-2",
});
mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-z"]);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "admin-2",
keyId: "board-key-3",
source: "board_key",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
companyIds: [],
});
const res = await request(app).post("/api/cli-auth/revoke-current").send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
userId: "admin-2",
boardApiKeyId: "board-key-3",
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
companyId: "company-z",
action: "board_api_key.revoked",
}),
);
});
});