ab9051b595
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Operators and agents coordinate through company-scoped issues, comments, documents, and task relationships. > - Issue text can mention other tickets, but those references were previously plain markdown/text without durable relationship data. > - That made it harder to understand related work, surface backlinks, and keep cross-ticket context visible in the board. > - This pull request adds first-class issue reference extraction, storage, API responses, and UI surfaces. > - The benefit is that issue references become queryable, navigable, and visible without relying on ad hoc text scanning. ## What Changed - Added shared issue-reference parsing utilities and exported reference-related types/constants. - Added an `issue_reference_mentions` table, idempotent migration DDL, schema exports, and database documentation. - Added server-side issue reference services, route integration, activity summaries, and a backfill command for existing issue content. - Added UI reference pills, related-work panels, markdown/editor mention handling, and issue detail/property rendering updates. - Added focused shared, server, and UI tests for parsing, persistence, display, and related-work behavior. - Rebased `PAP-735-first-class-task-references` cleanly onto `public-gh/master`; no `pnpm-lock.yaml` changes are included. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm test:run packages/shared/src/issue-references.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-references-service.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRelatedWorkPanel.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx` ## Risks - Medium risk because this adds a new issue-reference persistence path that touches shared parsing, database schema, server routes, and UI rendering. - Migration risk is mitigated by `CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS`, guarded foreign-key creation, and `CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS` statements so users who have applied an older local version of the numbered migration can re-run safely. - UI risk is limited by focused component coverage, but reviewers should still manually inspect issue detail pages containing ticket references before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-using shell workflow with repository inspection, git rebase/push, typecheck, and focused Vitest verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: dotta <dotta@example.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
268 lines
8.9 KiB
TypeScript
268 lines
8.9 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import { normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy } from "../services/issue-execution-policy.ts";
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
addComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
|
|
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
|
|
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(async () => false),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(async () => false),
|
|
}),
|
|
agentService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
}),
|
|
documentService: () => ({}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
|
feedbackService: () => ({
|
|
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
|
|
}),
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
}),
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
})),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
routineService: () => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}),
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
async function createApp() {
|
|
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
};
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function makeIssue() {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "local-board",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-580",
|
|
title: "Activity event issue",
|
|
executionPolicy: null,
|
|
executionState: null,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue activity event routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
|
|
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("logs blocker activity with added and removed issue summaries", async () => {
|
|
const issue = makeIssue();
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
|
|
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
|
blockedBy: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-10",
|
|
title: "Old blocker",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
blocks: [],
|
|
})
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
|
blockedBy: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-11",
|
|
title: "New blocker",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
blocks: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
|
|
...issue,
|
|
...patch,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
|
|
.send({ blockedByIssueIds: ["bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb"] });
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
action: "issue.blockers_updated",
|
|
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
addedBlockedByIssueIds: ["bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb"],
|
|
removedBlockedByIssueIds: ["aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa"],
|
|
addedBlockedByIssues: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-11",
|
|
title: "New blocker",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
removedBlockedByIssues: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-10",
|
|
title: "Old blocker",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}, 15_000);
|
|
|
|
it("logs explicit reviewer and approver activity when execution policy participants change", async () => {
|
|
const existingPolicy = normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy({
|
|
stages: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
type: "review",
|
|
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "11111111-2222-4333-8444-555555555555" }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
type: "approval",
|
|
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "66666666-7777-4888-8999-aaaaaaaaaaaa" }],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
})!;
|
|
const nextPolicy = normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy({
|
|
stages: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
type: "review",
|
|
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff" }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
type: "approval",
|
|
participants: [{ type: "user", userId: "local-board" }],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
})!;
|
|
const issue = {
|
|
...makeIssue(),
|
|
executionPolicy: existingPolicy,
|
|
};
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(issue);
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockImplementation(async (_id: string, patch: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
|
|
...issue,
|
|
...patch,
|
|
executionPolicy: patch.executionPolicy,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.patch("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111")
|
|
.send({ executionPolicy: nextPolicy });
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
action: "issue.reviewers_updated",
|
|
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
participants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff", userId: null }],
|
|
addedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "bbbbbbbb-cccc-4ddd-8eee-ffffffffffff", userId: null }],
|
|
removedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "11111111-2222-4333-8444-555555555555", userId: null }],
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
action: "issue.approvers_updated",
|
|
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
participants: [{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" }],
|
|
addedParticipants: [{ type: "user", agentId: null, userId: "local-board" }],
|
|
removedParticipants: [{ type: "agent", agentId: "66666666-7777-4888-8999-aaaaaaaaaaaa", userId: null }],
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|