Files
paperclip/ui/src/lib/issueDetailQuery.test.tsx
T
Dotta 32a9165ddf [codex] harden authenticated routes and issue editor reliability (#3741)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - The control plane depends on authenticated routes enforcing company
boundaries and role permissions correctly
> - This branch also touches the issue detail and markdown editing flows
operators use while handling advisory and triage work
> - Partial issue cache seeds and fragile rich-editor parsing could
leave important issue content missing or blank at the moment an operator
needed it
> - Blocked issues becoming actionable again should wake their assignee
automatically instead of silently staying idle
> - This pull request rebases the advisory follow-up branch onto current
`master`, hardens authenticated route authorization, and carries the
issue-detail/editor reliability fixes forward with regression tests
> - The benefit is tighter authz on sensitive routes plus more reliable
issue/advisory editing and wakeup behavior on top of the latest base

## What Changed

- Hardened authenticated route authorization across agent, activity,
approval, access, project, plugin, health, execution-workspace,
portability, and related server paths, with new cross-tenant and
runtime-authz regression coverage.
- Switched issue detail queries from `initialData` to placeholder-based
hydration so list/quicklook seeds still refetch full issue bodies.
- Normalized advisory-style HTML images before mounting the markdown
editor and strengthened fallback behavior when the rich editor silently
fails or rejects the content.
- Woke assigned agents when blocked issues move back to `todo`, with
route coverage for reopen and unblock transitions.
- Rebasing note: this branch now sits cleanly on top of the latest
`master` tip used for the PR base.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issueDetailQuery.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/activity-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts`
- Confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not part of the PR diff.
- Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` before publishing.

## Risks

- Broad authz tightening may expose existing flows that were relying on
permissive board or agent access and now need explicit grants.
- Markdown editor fallback changes could affect focus or rendering in
edge-case content that mixes HTML-like advisory markup with normal
markdown.
- This verification was intentionally scoped to touched regressions and
did not run the full repository suite.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in the Codex CLI environment
with tool use for terminal, git, and GitHub operations. The exact
runtime model identifier is not exposed inside this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, it is behavior-only and does not
need before/after screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes, or no
documentation changes were needed for these internal fixes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-15 08:41:15 -05:00

130 lines
3.6 KiB
TypeScript

// @vitest-environment jsdom
import { act } from "react";
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
import type { Issue } from "@paperclipai/shared";
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider, useQuery, useQueryClient } from "@tanstack/react-query";
import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { issuesApi } from "@/api/issues";
import { queryKeys } from "@/lib/queryKeys";
import { getIssueDetailQueryOptions } from "./issueDetailCache";
vi.mock("@/api/issues", () => ({
issuesApi: {
get: vi.fn(),
},
}));
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
(globalThis as any).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
function makeIssue(overrides: Partial<Issue> = {}): Issue {
const now = new Date("2026-04-13T20:00:00.000Z");
return {
id: "issue-1",
companyId: "company-1",
projectId: null,
projectWorkspaceId: null,
goalId: null,
parentId: null,
title: "Issue title",
description: null,
status: "todo",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: null,
checkoutRunId: null,
executionRunId: null,
executionAgentNameKey: null,
executionLockedAt: null,
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: null,
issueNumber: 1442,
identifier: "PAP-1442",
requestDepth: 0,
billingCode: null,
assigneeAdapterOverrides: null,
executionWorkspaceId: null,
executionWorkspacePreference: null,
executionWorkspaceSettings: null,
startedAt: null,
completedAt: null,
cancelledAt: null,
hiddenAt: null,
createdAt: now,
updatedAt: now,
...overrides,
};
}
function IssueDetailQueryHarness({
issueRef,
placeholderIssue,
}: {
issueRef: string;
placeholderIssue?: Pick<Issue, "id" | "identifier"> | null;
}) {
const queryClient = useQueryClient();
const query = useQuery({
...getIssueDetailQueryOptions(queryClient, issueRef, { placeholderIssue }),
});
return <div>{query.data?.description ?? "EMPTY"}</div>;
}
async function flush() {
// Multiple act cycles to allow React Query to process the async queryFn
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
await act(async () => {
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0));
});
}
}
describe("getIssueDetailQueryOptions", () => {
afterEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
});
it("treats cached issue data as placeholder and still fetches full detail", async () => {
const container = document.createElement("div");
document.body.appendChild(container);
const root = createRoot(container);
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: {
queries: {
retry: false,
},
},
});
const partialIssue = makeIssue({ description: null });
const fullIssue = makeIssue({ description: "GitHub Security Advisory body" });
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.detail("issue-1"), partialIssue);
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.detail("PAP-1442"), partialIssue);
vi.mocked(issuesApi.get).mockResolvedValue(fullIssue);
await act(async () => {
root.render(
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
<IssueDetailQueryHarness
issueRef="PAP-1442"
placeholderIssue={{ id: partialIssue.id, identifier: partialIssue.identifier }}
/>
</QueryClientProvider>,
);
});
await flush();
expect(issuesApi.get).toHaveBeenCalledWith("PAP-1442");
expect(container.textContent).toContain("GitHub Security Advisory body");
await act(async () => {
root.unmount();
});
queryClient.clear();
container.remove();
});
});