32a9165ddf
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The control plane depends on authenticated routes enforcing company boundaries and role permissions correctly > - This branch also touches the issue detail and markdown editing flows operators use while handling advisory and triage work > - Partial issue cache seeds and fragile rich-editor parsing could leave important issue content missing or blank at the moment an operator needed it > - Blocked issues becoming actionable again should wake their assignee automatically instead of silently staying idle > - This pull request rebases the advisory follow-up branch onto current `master`, hardens authenticated route authorization, and carries the issue-detail/editor reliability fixes forward with regression tests > - The benefit is tighter authz on sensitive routes plus more reliable issue/advisory editing and wakeup behavior on top of the latest base ## What Changed - Hardened authenticated route authorization across agent, activity, approval, access, project, plugin, health, execution-workspace, portability, and related server paths, with new cross-tenant and runtime-authz regression coverage. - Switched issue detail queries from `initialData` to placeholder-based hydration so list/quicklook seeds still refetch full issue bodies. - Normalized advisory-style HTML images before mounting the markdown editor and strengthened fallback behavior when the rich editor silently fails or rejects the content. - Woke assigned agents when blocked issues move back to `todo`, with route coverage for reopen and unblock transitions. - Rebasing note: this branch now sits cleanly on top of the latest `master` tip used for the PR base. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issueDetailQuery.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/activity-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts` - Confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not part of the PR diff. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` before publishing. ## Risks - Broad authz tightening may expose existing flows that were relying on permissive board or agent access and now need explicit grants. - Markdown editor fallback changes could affect focus or rendering in edge-case content that mixes HTML-like advisory markup with normal markdown. - This verification was intentionally scoped to touched regressions and did not run the full repository suite. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in the Codex CLI environment with tool use for terminal, git, and GitHub operations. The exact runtime model identifier is not exposed inside this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, it is behavior-only and does not need before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes, or no documentation changes were needed for these internal fixes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
130 lines
3.6 KiB
TypeScript
130 lines
3.6 KiB
TypeScript
// @vitest-environment jsdom
|
|
|
|
import { act } from "react";
|
|
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
|
|
import type { Issue } from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider, useQuery, useQueryClient } from "@tanstack/react-query";
|
|
import { afterEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import { issuesApi } from "@/api/issues";
|
|
import { queryKeys } from "@/lib/queryKeys";
|
|
import { getIssueDetailQueryOptions } from "./issueDetailCache";
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("@/api/issues", () => ({
|
|
issuesApi: {
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
},
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
|
(globalThis as any).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
|
|
|
|
function makeIssue(overrides: Partial<Issue> = {}): Issue {
|
|
const now = new Date("2026-04-13T20:00:00.000Z");
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
projectId: null,
|
|
projectWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
goalId: null,
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
title: "Issue title",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
checkoutRunId: null,
|
|
executionRunId: null,
|
|
executionAgentNameKey: null,
|
|
executionLockedAt: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
issueNumber: 1442,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-1442",
|
|
requestDepth: 0,
|
|
billingCode: null,
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspacePreference: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceSettings: null,
|
|
startedAt: null,
|
|
completedAt: null,
|
|
cancelledAt: null,
|
|
hiddenAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function IssueDetailQueryHarness({
|
|
issueRef,
|
|
placeholderIssue,
|
|
}: {
|
|
issueRef: string;
|
|
placeholderIssue?: Pick<Issue, "id" | "identifier"> | null;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const queryClient = useQueryClient();
|
|
const query = useQuery({
|
|
...getIssueDetailQueryOptions(queryClient, issueRef, { placeholderIssue }),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
return <div>{query.data?.description ?? "EMPTY"}</div>;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function flush() {
|
|
// Multiple act cycles to allow React Query to process the async queryFn
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0));
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("getIssueDetailQueryOptions", () => {
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("treats cached issue data as placeholder and still fetches full detail", async () => {
|
|
const container = document.createElement("div");
|
|
document.body.appendChild(container);
|
|
const root = createRoot(container);
|
|
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
|
|
defaultOptions: {
|
|
queries: {
|
|
retry: false,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
const partialIssue = makeIssue({ description: null });
|
|
const fullIssue = makeIssue({ description: "GitHub Security Advisory body" });
|
|
|
|
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.detail("issue-1"), partialIssue);
|
|
queryClient.setQueryData(queryKeys.issues.detail("PAP-1442"), partialIssue);
|
|
vi.mocked(issuesApi.get).mockResolvedValue(fullIssue);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
root.render(
|
|
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
|
|
<IssueDetailQueryHarness
|
|
issueRef="PAP-1442"
|
|
placeholderIssue={{ id: partialIssue.id, identifier: partialIssue.identifier }}
|
|
/>
|
|
</QueryClientProvider>,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await flush();
|
|
|
|
expect(issuesApi.get).toHaveBeenCalledWith("PAP-1442");
|
|
expect(container.textContent).toContain("GitHub Security Advisory body");
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
root.unmount();
|
|
});
|
|
queryClient.clear();
|
|
container.remove();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|