d734bd43d1
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, so agent work needs visible ownership, recovery, and operator controls. > - This local branch had accumulated several related control-plane reliability and operator-experience fixes across recovery actions, watchdog folding, model-profile defaults, mentions, markdown editing, plugin launchers, and small UI polish. > - The branch needed to be converted into a PR against the current `origin/master` without losing dirty work or including lockfile/workflow churn. > - The safest standalone shape is a single rollup PR because the recovery/server/UI files overlap heavily across the local commits and splitting would create avoidable conflicts. > - This pull request replays the local branch onto latest `origin/master`, preserves the uncommitted work as logical commits, and adds a Zod 4 validator compatibility fix found during verification. > - The benefit is that the May 17 local branch can be reviewed and merged as one coherent, conflict-free branch under the 100-file Greptile limit. ## What Changed - Rebased the local May 17 branch work onto current `origin/master` in a dedicated worktree. - Preserved and committed previously dirty changes for recovery retry handling, plugin/sidebar launcher polish, and `.herenow` ignores. - Added recovery-action behavior for returning source issues to `todo` when retrying source-scoped recovery. - Included the existing local recovery/liveness/watchdog fold, Codex cheap-profile, markdown/mention, duplicate-agent, and UI polish commits from the branch. - Normalized shared validator `z.record(...)` schemas to explicit string-key records for Zod 4 compatibility. - Confirmed the PR has no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*` changes and stays below the 100-file Greptile limit. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` - `npm run install` in `node_modules/.pnpm/sqlite3@5.1.7/node_modules/sqlite3` to build the local native sqlite3 binding after installing with scripts disabled - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts packages/shared/src/project-mentions.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-local-folders.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx ui/src/lib/duplicate-agent-payload.test.ts ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx` - First pass: 13 files passed with 201 passing tests; 3 server files failed before sqlite3 native binding was built. - After rebuilding sqlite3: `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts`, `server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts`, and `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts` passed/loaded; embedded Postgres tests were skipped by the local host guard. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` ## Risks - Medium risk: this is a broad rollup PR across recovery semantics, server tests, shared validators, and UI surfaces. - Some embedded Postgres tests skipped locally due the host guard, so CI should provide the stronger database-backed signal. - UI changes were covered by component tests, but no browser screenshot was captured in this PR creation pass. - This branch may overlap with existing recovery/liveness PR work; merge this PR independently or restack/close overlapping branches rather than merging duplicate implementations together. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled local repository and GitHub workflow, medium reasoning effort. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
277 lines
8.4 KiB
TypeScript
277 lines
8.4 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockWakeup = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getAncestors: vi.fn(),
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
getComment: vi.fn(),
|
|
getCommentCursor: vi.fn(),
|
|
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
|
|
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
|
|
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
agentService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
documentService: () => ({
|
|
getIssueDocumentPayload: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
|
|
}),
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
feedbackService: () => ({}),
|
|
goalService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
getDefaultCompanyGoal: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => ({
|
|
wakeup: mockWakeup,
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}),
|
|
getIssueContinuationSummaryDocument: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
|
|
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => ({
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
projectService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
listByIds: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
routineService: () => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}),
|
|
workProductService: () => ({
|
|
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
async function createApp() {
|
|
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
};
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue dependency wakeups in issue routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.getAncestors.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getComment.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
mockIssueService.getCommentCursor.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
totalComments: 0,
|
|
latestCommentId: null,
|
|
latestCommentAt: null,
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("wakes dependents when the final blocker transitions to done", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "Finish blocker",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "blocked",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "issue-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "Finish blocker",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: null,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "issue-2",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-2",
|
|
blockerIssueIds: ["issue-1", "issue-3"],
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).patch("/api/issues/issue-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"agent-2",
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
reason: "issue_blockers_resolved",
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
issueId: "issue-2",
|
|
resolvedBlockerIssueId: "issue-1",
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("wakes the parent when all direct children become terminal", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
description: null,
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
parentId: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: null,
|
|
labels: [],
|
|
labelIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "parent-1",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-9",
|
|
childIssueIds: ["child-0", "child-1"],
|
|
childIssueSummaries: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "child-0",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-100",
|
|
title: "First child",
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-18T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
summary: "First child finished.",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "child-1",
|
|
identifier: "PAP-101",
|
|
title: "Last child",
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
priority: "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-18T12:05:00.000Z"),
|
|
summary: "Last child finished.",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
childIssueSummaryTruncated: false,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).patch("/api/issues/child-1").send({ status: "done" });
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
await vi.waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"agent-9",
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
reason: "issue_children_completed",
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
issueId: "parent-1",
|
|
completedChildIssueId: "child-1",
|
|
childIssueSummaries: expect.arrayContaining([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ identifier: "PAP-101", summary: "Last child finished." }),
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
contextSnapshot: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
childIssueSummaries: expect.arrayContaining([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ identifier: "PAP-100", summary: "First child finished." }),
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|