Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/issue-assigned-backlog-contract-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta 38c185fb8b [codex] Add agent permissions and controls plan (#6386)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies by keeping
task ownership, approvals, and operator control inside one control
plane.
> - Agent permissions and plugin-hosted company settings sit on the
boundary between autonomy and governance.
> - V1 needs scoped task assignment rules, plugin extension points, and
clearer company access surfaces without weakening company boundaries.
> - The branch builds the core authorization service, plugin SDK/host
APIs, and UI simplifications needed to support those controls.
> - Paperclip EE plugin surfaces were intentionally moved out of this
core PR per review direction, so this PR now carries only the public
core/plugin infrastructure work.
> - The latest updates preserve the PAP-9937 branch changes that belong
in this PR, remove the `design/` artifacts, and exclude the experimental
`plugin-briefs` package.
> - Greptile feedback was applied through the authorization/audit paths
and the final cleanup commit was re-reviewed at 5/5 with no unresolved
Greptile threads.
> - The benefit is safer assignment control with extension hooks for
richer permission products while preserving simple defaults for normal
operators.

## What Changed

- Added scoped task-assignment authorization decisions and routed
issue/agent assignment mutations through the authorization service.
- Added plugin SDK and host APIs for company settings slots,
authorization policy/grant management, assignment previews, and bridge
invocation scope propagation.
- Simplified core company access UI and moved advanced controls behind
plugin-provided settings surfaces.
- Added retry-now affordances for blocked issue next-step notices.
- Added protected-assignment enforcement for persisted
agent/project/issue policies, including explicit-grant fallback
behavior.
- Added incremental principal-access compatibility backfill for active
agent memberships and role-default human permission grants.
- Added the Markdown code block wrap action fix from the latest branch
changes.
- Removed `design/` artifacts from the PR and removed
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs` from the final diff.
- Addressed Greptile feedback for plugin actor sanitization, legacy
membership handling, audit pagination, unknown grant-scope metadata, and
startup test mocks.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 2 files passed, 54
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 3 files passed, 62
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-access-authorization-host-services.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` -> 3 files
passed, 28 tests passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` -> passed.
- `git diff --check` -> passed.
- `node ./scripts/check-docker-deps-stage.mjs` -> passed.
- `CI=true pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` -> passed
with no lockfile update.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.interaction.test.tsx` -> 1 test passed.
- `git ls-files design packages/plugins/plugin-briefs | wc -l` -> 0.
- GitHub CI on `40cd83b53` -> all checks passed, merge state `CLEAN`.
- Greptile on `40cd83b53` -> 5/5, 102 files reviewed, 0
comments/annotations added, 0 unresolved review threads.
- Confirmed the PR diff contains no `design/`,
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, or
`.github/workflows` changes.

## Risks

- Medium: task assignment authorization paths are behaviorally stricter
for protected/private policy data, so existing plugin-authored policies
may block assignment until explicit grants or approval flows are
configured.
- Medium: plugin-host authorization APIs expand the surface area
available to trusted plugins and need careful review for company
scoping.
- Low: startup now performs a principal-access compatibility backfill,
but the migration and runtime backfill use conflict-tolerant inserts.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled workflow with shell,
git, and GitHub CLI access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-22 08:12:52 -05:00

329 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const assigneeAgentId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const mockWakeup = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
create: vi.fn(),
createChild: vi.fn(),
getById: vi.fn(),
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(async () => null),
getComment: vi.fn(),
getCommentCursor: vi.fn(),
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(async () => []),
}));
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => ({
canUser: vi.fn(async () => true),
decide: vi.fn(async (input: { action?: string }) => ({
allowed: true,
action: input.action,
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
explanation: "Allowed by test grant.",
})),
hasPermission: vi.fn(async () => true),
}),
agentService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
companyService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
}),
documentService: () => ({
getIssueDocumentPayload: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
feedbackService: () => ({
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
}),
goalService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
getDefaultCompanyGoal: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
heartbeatService: () => ({
wakeup: mockWakeup,
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
getIssueContinuationSummaryDocument: vi.fn(async () => null),
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}),
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
}),
issueReferenceService: () => ({
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
addedReferencedIssues: [],
removedReferencedIssues: [],
currentReferencedIssues: [],
}),
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
syncComment: async () => undefined,
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
}),
issueThreadInteractionService: () => ({
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
listByIds: vi.fn(async () => []),
}),
routineService: () => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
workProductService: () => ({
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
}),
}));
async function createApp() {
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
function makeIssue(input: {
id: string;
title: string;
status?: string;
parentId?: string | null;
assigneeAgentId?: string | null;
}) {
return {
id: input.id,
companyId: "company-1",
identifier: input.id === "child-1" ? "PAP-3701" : "PAP-3700",
title: input.title,
description: null,
status: input.status ?? "todo",
priority: "medium",
parentId: input.parentId ?? null,
assigneeAgentId: input.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
assigneeUserId: null,
createdByAgentId: null,
createdByUserId: "local-board",
executionWorkspaceId: null,
labels: [],
labelIds: [],
};
}
function expectClearAssignedStatusValidation(res: request.Response) {
expect([400, 422]).toContain(res.status);
expect(String(res.body?.error ?? res.text)).toMatch(/assign|assignee|status|backlog|todo/i);
}
describe("assigned backlog creation contract", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue({
id: "parent-1",
title: "Parent issue",
status: "blocked",
assigneeAgentId,
}));
mockIssueService.create.mockImplementation(async (_companyId: string, data: Record<string, unknown>) =>
makeIssue({
id: "issue-1",
title: String(data.title),
status: String(data.status),
assigneeAgentId: data.assigneeAgentId as string | null | undefined,
}));
mockIssueService.createChild.mockImplementation(async (_parentId: string, data: Record<string, unknown>) => ({
issue: makeIssue({
id: "child-1",
title: String(data.title),
status: String(data.status),
parentId: "parent-1",
assigneeAgentId: data.assigneeAgentId as string | null | undefined,
}),
parentBlockerAdded: Boolean(data.blockParentUntilDone),
}));
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
});
it("does not silently create a top-level assigned issue as backlog when status is omitted", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/companies/company-1/issues")
.send({
title: "Assigned executable work",
assigneeAgentId,
});
if (res.status !== 201) {
expectClearAssignedStatusValidation(res);
expect(mockIssueService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockWakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
return;
}
expect(mockIssueService.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"company-1",
expect.objectContaining({
title: "Assigned executable work",
assigneeAgentId,
status: "todo",
}),
);
expect(res.body).toEqual(expect.objectContaining({
assigneeAgentId,
status: "todo",
}));
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
assigneeAgentId,
expect.objectContaining({
source: "assignment",
reason: "issue_assigned",
payload: expect.objectContaining({ mutation: "create" }),
}),
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.created",
details: expect.objectContaining({
status: "todo",
statusDefaulted: true,
statusDefaultReason: "assigned_omitted_status",
assignmentWakeSkipped: false,
}),
}),
);
});
it("does not let a parent-blocking assigned child become an unwoken backlog leaf by default", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/issues/parent-1/children")
.send({
title: "Assigned child blocker",
assigneeAgentId,
blockParentUntilDone: true,
});
if (res.status !== 201) {
expectClearAssignedStatusValidation(res);
expect(mockIssueService.createChild).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockWakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
return;
}
expect(mockIssueService.createChild).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"parent-1",
expect.objectContaining({
title: "Assigned child blocker",
assigneeAgentId,
blockParentUntilDone: true,
status: "todo",
}),
);
expect(res.body).toEqual(expect.objectContaining({
assigneeAgentId,
parentId: "parent-1",
status: "todo",
}));
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.child_created",
details: expect.objectContaining({
status: "todo",
statusDefaulted: true,
statusDefaultReason: "assigned_omitted_status",
assignmentWakeSkipped: false,
parentBlockerAdded: true,
}),
}),
);
expect(mockWakeup).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
assigneeAgentId,
expect.objectContaining({
source: "assignment",
reason: "issue_assigned",
payload: expect.objectContaining({ mutation: "create" }),
}),
);
});
it("preserves deliberate assigned backlog as parked work without assignment wakeup", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post("/api/companies/company-1/issues")
.send({
title: "Parked assigned work",
assigneeAgentId,
status: "backlog",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(mockIssueService.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"company-1",
expect.objectContaining({
title: "Parked assigned work",
assigneeAgentId,
status: "backlog",
}),
);
expect(res.body).toEqual(expect.objectContaining({
assigneeAgentId,
status: "backlog",
}));
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.created",
entityId: "issue-1",
details: expect.objectContaining({
status: "backlog",
statusDefaulted: false,
statusDefaultReason: "explicit",
assignmentWakeSkipped: true,
assignmentWakeSkipReason: "assigned_backlog",
}),
}),
);
expect(mockWakeup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});