Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-cancel-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta a957394420 [codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals,
and the board UI.
> - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not
hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals.
> - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native
surface for proposed tasks and questions.
> - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations,
richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers.
> - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become
explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue
workflow.

## What Changed

- Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks,
structured questions, and request confirmations.
- Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question
answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows.
- Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from
agents/plugins.
- Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill
docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for
issue-scoped decisions.
- Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch
migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD
COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users.

## Verification

- `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts
packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79
tests passed
- `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration
numbering check

## Risks

- Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across
db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces.
- Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master
migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add
idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering.
- UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR
does not include browser screenshots.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and
context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local
shell/code execution were enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-21 20:15:11 -05:00

265 lines
8.7 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
getComment: vi.fn(),
removeComment: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
const mockFeedbackService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
}));
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}));
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
}));
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/feedback.js", () => ({
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => ({ getById: vi.fn(async () => null) }),
documentService: () => ({}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueReferenceService: () => ({
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
addedReferencedIssues: [],
removedReferencedIssues: [],
currentReferencedIssues: [],
}),
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
syncComment: async () => undefined,
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => ({ syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined) }),
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
}
function createApp() {
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
return app;
}
async function installActor(app: express.Express, actor?: Record<string, unknown>) {
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = actor ?? {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
function makeIssue() {
return {
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
companyId: "company-1",
status: "in_progress",
assigneeAgentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
assigneeUserId: null,
executionRunId: "run-1",
identifier: "PAP-1353",
title: "Queued cancel",
};
}
function makeComment(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
return {
id: "comment-1",
companyId: "company-1",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
authorAgentId: null,
authorUserId: "local-board",
body: "Queued follow-up",
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-11T15:01:00.000Z"),
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-11T15:01:00.000Z"),
...overrides,
};
}
describe("issue comment cancel routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry");
vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/feedback.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.resetAllMocks();
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
mockIssueService.getComment.mockResolvedValue(makeComment());
mockIssueService.removeComment.mockResolvedValue(makeComment());
mockAccessService.canUser.mockResolvedValue(false);
mockAccessService.hasPermission.mockResolvedValue(false);
mockFeedbackService.listIssueVotesForUser.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockResolvedValue({
vote: null,
consentEnabledNow: false,
sharingEnabled: false,
});
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-1",
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
status: "running",
startedAt: new Date("2026-04-11T15:00:00.000Z"),
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-11T14:59:00.000Z"),
});
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
});
it("cancels a queued comment from its author and restores the deleted body", async () => {
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.delete("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments/comment-1");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
id: "comment-1",
body: "Queued follow-up",
});
expect(mockIssueService.removeComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith("comment-1");
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
action: "issue.comment_cancelled",
details: expect.objectContaining({
commentId: "comment-1",
source: "queue_cancel",
queueTargetRunId: "run-1",
}),
}),
);
});
it("rejects canceling comments that are no longer queued", async () => {
mockIssueService.getComment.mockResolvedValue(
makeComment({
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-11T14:58:00.000Z"),
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-11T14:58:00.000Z"),
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.delete("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments/comment-1");
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
expect(res.body.error).toBe("Only queued comments can be canceled");
expect(mockIssueService.removeComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects canceling another actor's queued comment", async () => {
mockIssueService.getComment.mockResolvedValue(
makeComment({
authorUserId: "someone-else",
}),
);
const res = await request(await installActor(createApp()))
.delete("/api/issues/11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111/comments/comment-1");
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toBe("Only the comment author can cancel queued comments");
expect(mockIssueService.removeComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});