# Authentication Analysis Report

## 1. Executive Summary

- **Analysis Status:** Complete
- **Key Outcome:** Multiple critical authentication vulnerabilities identified, enabling complete authentication bypass through session forgery, client-controlled session fixation (IDOR), and weak credential management.
- **Purpose of this Document:** This report provides strategic context on the application's authentication mechanisms, dominant vulnerability patterns, and architectural weaknesses necessary to effectively exploit the vulnerabilities listed in the exploitation queue.

**Critical Findings:**
1. **Client-Controlled Session Fixation (CWE-639)** - Application accepts user_id from client-controlled hidden form field, allowing horizontal privilege escalation to any user account
2. **Weak Flask Secret Key** - Hardcoded 'your_secret_key' enables complete session cookie forgery and authentication bypass
3. **Plaintext Password Storage** - All passwords stored without hashing (bcrypt/Argon2/PBKDF2)
4. **No Transport Security** - HTTP-only deployment with no TLS/HTTPS enforcement
5. **Missing Session Security** - No Secure/SameSite flags, no session rotation, deterministic session IDs, session replay after logout

## 2. Dominant Vulnerability Patterns

### Pattern 1: Client-Controlled Authentication State (CRITICAL)

**Description:** The most severe flaw is that the application allows the client to specify which user_id should be set in the session after password validation. At routes.py:55-56, the application validates the password for username A but accepts a client-supplied user_id parameter (from a hidden form field) without verifying it matches the authenticated user. This enables trivial horizontal privilege escalation.

**Implication:** An attacker can authenticate with valid credentials (test:test) but modify the hidden user_id field to 10001 (flag user) in the POST request, gaining immediate access to any user account without knowing their password. This is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability at the authentication layer.

**Representative Findings:** `AUTH-VULN-01` (Session Fixation via Client-Controlled user_id)

**Technical Details:**
- Vulnerable Code: routes.py:55-56
- Hidden field exposure: templates/password.html:29
- No validation that authenticated username matches the user_id being set in session
- Attack requires only modifying a hidden form field via browser DevTools or proxy

### Pattern 2: Weak Cryptographic Foundation (CRITICAL)

**Description:** The Flask secret key is hardcoded as 'your_secret_key' (__init__.py:11), a well-known placeholder value with minimal entropy (3.19 bits vs required 256+ bits). Flask uses this key to sign session cookies via HMAC-SHA1. With the weak key, attackers can forge arbitrary session cookies for any user_id.

**Implication:** Complete authentication bypass without needing credentials. An attacker can generate a valid session cookie for user_id=10001 (flag user) using the known secret key, bypassing all authentication mechanisms. Session cookies are deterministic - multiple logins within the same second generate identical cookies.

**Representative Findings:** `AUTH-VULN-02` (Weak Secret Key Enables Session Forgery)

**Technical Details:**
- Secret key location: __init__.py:11
- Entropy: 3.19 bits (should be 256+)
- Session structure: base64(JSON).timestamp.HMAC_signature
- Forgery demonstrated with itsdangerous library
- No session encryption, only signing (session data readable by base64 decode)

### Pattern 3: Complete Absence of Password Security (CRITICAL)

**Description:** Passwords are stored in plaintext in the database (models.py:8) with no bcrypt, Argon2, PBKDF2, or scrypt hashing. Password validation uses direct SQL comparison (routes.py:53) vulnerable to timing attacks. No password policy enforcement exists - single character passwords are accepted. Default credentials (test:test) are hardcoded in initialization code.

**Implication:** Database breach immediately exposes all user passwords. Credential stuffing attacks are trivial with no rate limiting. The test:test account provides immediate access for reconnaissance. Password comparison timing may leak information about valid passwords.

**Representative Findings:** `AUTH-VULN-05` (Plaintext Password Storage), `AUTH-VULN-06` (No Password Policy)

**Technical Details:**
- Storage: db.Column(db.String(100), nullable=False) - plaintext string
- Comparison: User.query.filter_by(username=username, password=password).first()
- No hashing dependencies in requirements.txt
- Test account: username='test', password='test' (hardcoded at __init__.py:29)

### Pattern 4: Session Management Failures (HIGH)

**Description:** Multiple session management vulnerabilities compound to create exploitable weaknesses: (1) Session IDs not rotated after login - same session persists pre/post authentication, (2) Logout doesn't invalidate sessions server-side - old cookies remain valid after logout due to Flask's client-side session mechanism, (3) Session cookies deterministic - identical sessions for same user/second, (4) Missing Secure and SameSite flags on cookies.

**Implication:** Session fixation attacks, session hijacking through cookie replay, CSRF vulnerabilities due to missing SameSite, session persistence after logout enabling session restoration attacks.

**Representative Findings:** `AUTH-VULN-03` (No Session Rotation), `AUTH-VULN-04` (Insufficient Session Expiration), `AUTH-VULN-08` (Missing Cookie Flags)

**Technical Details:**
- No session.regenerate() or equivalent at routes.py:56
- Logout implementation: session.pop('user_id', None) at routes.py:39
- Client-side Flask sessions with no server-side state
- Cookie flags: HttpOnly=True (default), Secure=False, SameSite=None

### Pattern 5: Missing Transport Security (HIGH)

**Description:** Application runs on HTTP-only (port 80) with no HTTPS/TLS configuration at any layer (Apache, Flask, Docker). No HSTS headers. No HTTP-to-HTTPS redirect. Credentials transmitted in plaintext over the network. Cache-Control headers non-functional due to implementation bug (modifying request object instead of response object at routes.py:8-14).

**Implication:** Man-in-the-middle attacks can intercept credentials and session cookies. Network sniffing reveals all authentication data. Browser/proxy caching of authentication responses possible. Session hijacking through network interception.

**Representative Findings:** `AUTH-VULN-07` (HTTP-Only Transport), `AUTH-VULN-09` (Broken Cache-Control)

**Technical Details:**
- Apache VirtualHost *:80 only (trading_platform-httpd.conf:1)
- Docker exposes port 80 only (docker-compose.yml:20-21)
- Cache-Control bug: routes.py:10-13 modifies request.headers instead of response.headers
- No SSL module enabled in Apache

### Pattern 6: Insufficient Abuse Defenses (HIGH)

**Description:** Complete absence of rate limiting, CAPTCHA, account lockout, or brute force protection on all authentication endpoints. No Flask-Limiter or similar library. No Apache mod_evasive or mod_security. No failed login tracking in User model. No monitoring or alerting for suspicious authentication activity.

**Implication:** Unlimited brute force attacks against any account. Credential stuffing and password spraying attacks unconstrained. Username enumeration through unlimited testing. No detection of ongoing attacks.

**Representative Findings:** `AUTH-VULN-10` (No Rate Limiting)

**Technical Details:**
- No rate limiting dependencies in requirements.txt
- No @limiter decorators on routes
- User model lacks failed_attempts, locked_until fields (models.py:5-11)
- No logging module imported in application code

### Pattern 7: User Enumeration (MEDIUM)

**Description:** Login endpoint reveals username existence through differential responses. Invalid username returns "User not found" error (200 OK, stays on /), valid username redirects to /password/<username> (302 FOUND). Password page reveals first names in welcome message. Different error messages for invalid username vs incorrect password.

**Implication:** Attackers can systematically enumerate all valid usernames. Targeted attacks focus on confirmed accounts. Social engineering enhanced with knowledge of real usernames and first names.

**Representative Findings:** `AUTH-VULN-11` (Username Enumeration)

**Technical Details:**
- Vulnerable code: routes.py:25-28 (redirect on valid) vs routes.py:30 (error on invalid)
- First name disclosure: templates/password.html:26 "Welcome, {{ first_name }}!"
- Direct URL access: /password/test shows "Welcome, John!"

## 3. Strategic Intelligence for Exploitation

### Authentication Architecture

**Method:** Two-stage authentication flow (username submission → password submission) with Flask session cookies

**Flow Details:**
1. POST / with username → Database lookup → Redirect to /password/<username> if exists
2. GET /password/<username> → Renders password form with hidden fields (username, user_id)
3. POST /password/<username> → Password validation → **Sets session['user_id'] = request.form['user_id']** ← CRITICAL FLAW
4. All protected resources check: if session.get('user_id')

### Session Token Details

**Type:** Flask client-side signed cookies using itsdangerous library

**Structure:** `base64(JSON_payload).base64(timestamp).HMAC_SHA1_signature`

**Example:** `eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoiMTAwMzIifQ.aQP1EQ.fyBh7Qqd1X3n9OcmCdjWFQdTjTI`
- Payload: {"user_id":"10032"}
- Timestamp: Unix time encoded
- Signature: HMAC-SHA1 using secret_key='your_secret_key'

**Cookie Name:** `session`

**Cookie Flags:**
- HttpOnly: True (JavaScript cannot access)
- Secure: False (transmitted over HTTP)
- SameSite: None (sent with cross-site requests)
- Path: /

**Storage:** Client-side only (no server-side session store)

**Validity:** Infinite (no expiration) until user logs out (but logout doesn't truly invalidate)

### Known Credentials

1. **Test Account:** username=test, password=test, user_id=10032, first_name=John, last_name=Doe
2. **Flag Account:** username=flag, password=<random_100_chars>, user_id=10001, first_name=Flag, last_name=<FLAG>

### Password Policy

**Enforcement:** None

**Allows:**
- Single character passwords
- No complexity requirements
- Common passwords
- Password equals username

**Storage:** Plaintext in MySQL database

### Exploitation Prioritization

**Primary Attack Vector (Easiest):** Client-controlled session fixation
1. Login as test:test
2. Intercept POST to /password/test
3. Modify hidden user_id field from 10032 to 10001
4. Submit → Session created with user_id=10001 (flag user)
5. Access /dashboard → FLAG revealed in last_name field

**Secondary Attack Vector:** Session cookie forgery
1. Use itsdangerous library with secret_key='your_secret_key'
2. Generate cookie: {"user_id":"10001"}
3. Set cookie in browser
4. Access /dashboard → FLAG revealed

**Tertiary Attack Vector:** Brute force flag user password (less practical)
1. Enumerate username: flag (via /password/flag showing "Welcome, Flag!")
2. Unlimited attempts against /password/flag
3. 100-character alphanumeric password (62^100 combinations - not feasible)

## 4. Secure by Design: Validated Components

These components were analyzed and found to have adequate protections or are not vulnerable in the examined context:

| Component/Flow | Endpoint/File Location | Defense Mechanism Implemented | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| SQL Injection Protection | All database queries (routes.py:25,46,53,55,74) | SQLAlchemy ORM with parameterized queries | SAFE - No raw SQL, all queries use .filter_by() or .get() |
| XSS Protection | Template rendering (login.html, password.html, dashboard.html) | Jinja2 auto-escaping enabled by default | SAFE - {{ }} expressions escaped, no |safe filter usage |
| Session Cookie HttpOnly | Flask session configuration | Flask default HttpOnly=True since v1.0+ | SAFE - JavaScript cannot access session cookie via document.cookie |
| URL Parameter Safety | Redirect functions (routes.py:28,40,49,57,64,78) | Flask url_for() with hardcoded route names | SAFE - No user-controlled URL redirects, no open redirect vulnerability |
| Session Data Integrity | Session cookie signing | HMAC-SHA1 signature (though weak key compromises this) | PARTIAL - Signature mechanism correct, but weak key enables forgery |
| Apache Access Logs | Apache logging (trading_platform-httpd.conf:3-4) | 'combined' format excludes Cookie headers | SAFE - Session cookies not logged in access.log |

**Note:** Components marked SAFE are secure within their specific implementation context but may be undermined by other vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection protection doesn't matter if plaintext passwords are exposed through database breach).

---

## 5. Authentication Bypass Techniques Summary

This section provides the exploitation specialist with specific attack patterns to attempt:

### Technique 1: Client-Controlled Session Fixation (IDOR)
- **Vulnerability:** AUTH-VULN-01
- **Method:** Modify hidden user_id form field
- **Success Probability:** 100% (confirmed exploitable)
- **Stealth:** Medium (requires proxy/DevTools, logged in access.log)

### Technique 2: Session Cookie Forgery
- **Vulnerability:** AUTH-VULN-02
- **Method:** Generate valid cookie with itsdangerous using known secret
- **Success Probability:** 100% (confirmed exploitable)
- **Stealth:** High (no authentication attempts logged)

### Technique 3: Session Replay After Logout
- **Vulnerability:** AUTH-VULN-04
- **Method:** Save session cookie before logout, replay afterward
- **Success Probability:** 100% (confirmed exploitable)
- **Stealth:** High (appears as legitimate session)

### Technique 4: Brute Force with No Rate Limiting
- **Vulnerability:** AUTH-VULN-10
- **Method:** Unlimited password attempts via POST /password/<username>
- **Success Probability:** Low for flag user (100-char password), High for weak passwords
- **Stealth:** Low (generates high volume of 302 redirects)

### Technique 5: Username Enumeration → Targeted Attack
- **Vulnerability:** AUTH-VULN-11
- **Method:** Enumerate valid usernames, focus attacks on confirmed accounts
- **Success Probability:** Medium (depends on password strength of enumerated accounts)
- **Stealth:** Low (multiple username submissions logged)

---

**ANALYSIS COMPLETE**