[codex] Roll up May 17 branch changes (#6210)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, so agent
work needs visible ownership, recovery, and operator controls.
> - This local branch had accumulated several related control-plane
reliability and operator-experience fixes across recovery actions,
watchdog folding, model-profile defaults, mentions, markdown editing,
plugin launchers, and small UI polish.
> - The branch needed to be converted into a PR against the current
`origin/master` without losing dirty work or including lockfile/workflow
churn.
> - The safest standalone shape is a single rollup PR because the
recovery/server/UI files overlap heavily across the local commits and
splitting would create avoidable conflicts.
> - This pull request replays the local branch onto latest
`origin/master`, preserves the uncommitted work as logical commits, and
adds a Zod 4 validator compatibility fix found during verification.
> - The benefit is that the May 17 local branch can be reviewed and
merged as one coherent, conflict-free branch under the 100-file Greptile
limit.

## What Changed

- Rebased the local May 17 branch work onto current `origin/master` in a
dedicated worktree.
- Preserved and committed previously dirty changes for recovery retry
handling, plugin/sidebar launcher polish, and `.herenow` ignores.
- Added recovery-action behavior for returning source issues to `todo`
when retrying source-scoped recovery.
- Included the existing local recovery/liveness/watchdog fold, Codex
cheap-profile, markdown/mention, duplicate-agent, and UI polish commits
from the branch.
- Normalized shared validator `z.record(...)` schemas to explicit
string-key records for Zod 4 compatibility.
- Confirmed the PR has no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*`
changes and stays below the 100-file Greptile limit.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts`
- `npm run install` in
`node_modules/.pnpm/sqlite3@5.1.7/node_modules/sqlite3` to build the
local native sqlite3 binding after installing with scripts disabled
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts
packages/shared/src/project-mentions.test.ts
packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-local-folders.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueRecoveryActionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx
ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/duplicate-agent-payload.test.ts
ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx`
- First pass: 13 files passed with 201 passing tests; 3 server files
failed before sqlite3 native binding was built.
- After rebuilding sqlite3:
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-model-profile.test.ts`,
`server/src/__tests__/issue-recovery-actions.test.ts`, and
`server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-active-run-output-watchdog.test.ts`
passed/loaded; embedded Postgres tests were skipped by the local host
guard.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`

## Risks

- Medium risk: this is a broad rollup PR across recovery semantics,
server tests, shared validators, and UI surfaces.
- Some embedded Postgres tests skipped locally due the host guard, so CI
should provide the stronger database-backed signal.
- UI changes were covered by component tests, but no browser screenshot
was captured in this PR creation pass.
- This branch may overlap with existing recovery/liveness PR work; merge
this PR independently or restack/close overlapping branches rather than
merging duplicate implementations together.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled local repository
and GitHub workflow, medium reasoning effort.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

packages/shared/src/validators/issue.ts

@@ -116,14 +116,14 @@ export const issueExecutionWorkspaceSettingsSchema = z
     mode: z.enum(ISSUE_EXECUTION_WORKSPACE_PREFERENCES).optional(),
     environmentId: z.string().uuid().optional().nullable(),
     workspaceStrategy: executionWorkspaceStrategySchema.optional().nullable(),
-    workspaceRuntime: z.record(z.unknown()).optional().nullable(),
+    workspaceRuntime: z.record(z.string(), z.unknown()).optional().nullable(),
   })
   .strict();
 
 export const issueAssigneeAdapterOverridesSchema = z
   .object({
     modelProfile: z.enum(MODEL_PROFILE_KEYS).optional(),
-    adapterConfig: z.record(z.unknown()).optional(),
+    adapterConfig: z.record(z.string(), z.unknown()).optional(),
     useProjectWorkspace: z.boolean().optional(),
   })
   .strict();
@@ -248,10 +248,10 @@ export const issueRecoveryActionReadModelSchema = z.object({
   returnOwnerAgentId: z.string().uuid().nullable(),
   cause: z.string().min(1),
   fingerprint: z.string().min(1),
-  evidence: z.record(z.unknown()),
+  evidence: z.record(z.string(), z.unknown()),
   nextAction: z.string().min(1),
-  wakePolicy: z.record(z.unknown()).nullable(),
-  monitorPolicy: z.record(z.unknown()).nullable(),
+  wakePolicy: z.record(z.string(), z.unknown()).nullable(),
+  monitorPolicy: z.record(z.string(), z.unknown()).nullable(),
   attemptCount: z.number().int().nonnegative(),
   maxAttempts: z.number().int().positive().nullable(),
   timeoutAt: z.union([z.date(), z.string().datetime()]).nullable(),
@@ -275,14 +275,18 @@ const RESOLVE_ISSUE_RECOVERY_ACTION_OUTCOMES = [
 export const resolveIssueRecoveryActionSchema = z.object({
   actionId: z.string().uuid().optional(),
   outcome: z.enum(RESOLVE_ISSUE_RECOVERY_ACTION_OUTCOMES),
-  sourceIssueStatus: z.enum(["done", "in_review", "blocked"]),
+  sourceIssueStatus: z.enum(["todo", "done", "in_review", "blocked"]),
   resolutionNote: multilineTextSchema.optional().nullable(),
 }).strict().superRefine((value, ctx) => {
   if (value.outcome === "restored") {
-    if (value.sourceIssueStatus !== "done" && value.sourceIssueStatus !== "in_review") {
+    if (
+      value.sourceIssueStatus !== "todo" &&
+      value.sourceIssueStatus !== "done" &&
+      value.sourceIssueStatus !== "in_review"
+    ) {
       ctx.addIssue({
         code: z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
-        message: "Restored recovery actions must move the source issue to done or in_review",
+        message: "Restored recovery actions must move the source issue to todo, done, or in_review",
         path: ["sourceIssueStatus"],
       });
     }