forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
[codex] Add access cleanup and user profile page (#4088)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is moving from a solo local operator model toward teams supervising AI-agent companies. > - Human access management and human-visible profile surfaces are part of that multiple-user path. > - The branch included related access cleanup, archived-member removal, permission protection, and a user profile page. > - These changes share company membership, user attribution, and access-service behavior. > - This pull request groups those human access/profile changes into one standalone branch. > - The benefit is safer member removal behavior and a first profile surface for user work, activity, and cost attribution. ## What Changed - Added archived company member removal support across shared contracts, server routes/services, and UI. - Protected company member removal with stricter permission checks and tests. - Added company user profile API, shared types, route wiring, client API, route, and UI page. - Simplified the user profile page visual design to a neutral typography-led layout. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/user-profile-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/CompanyAccess.test.tsx --hookTimeout=30000` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/user-profile-routes.test.ts --testTimeout=30000 --hookTimeout=30000` after an initial local embedded-Postgres hook timeout in the combined run. - Split integration check: merged after runtime/governance and dev-infra/backups with no merge conflicts. - Confirmed this branch does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Risks - Medium risk: changes member removal permissions and adds a new user profile route with cross-table stats. - The profile page is a new UI surface and may need visual follow-up in browser QA. - No database migrations are included. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.4 tool-enabled coding model, agentic code-editing/runtime with local shell and GitHub CLI access; exact context window and reasoning mode are not exposed by the Paperclip harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
|
||||
import { and, eq, inArray, sql } from "drizzle-orm";
|
||||
import { and, eq, inArray, ne, sql } from "drizzle-orm";
|
||||
import type { Db } from "@paperclipai/db";
|
||||
import {
|
||||
agents,
|
||||
companyMemberships,
|
||||
instanceUserRoles,
|
||||
issues,
|
||||
principalPermissionGrants,
|
||||
} from "@paperclipai/db";
|
||||
import type { PermissionKey, PrincipalType } from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
||||
@@ -14,6 +16,13 @@ type GrantInput = {
|
||||
scope?: Record<string, unknown> | null;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
type MemberArchiveInput = {
|
||||
reassignment?: {
|
||||
assigneeAgentId?: string | null;
|
||||
assigneeUserId?: string | null;
|
||||
} | null;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
export function accessService(db: Db) {
|
||||
async function isInstanceAdmin(userId: string | null | undefined): Promise<boolean> {
|
||||
if (!userId) return false;
|
||||
@@ -239,6 +248,176 @@ export function accessService(db: Db) {
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function assertCanRemoveActiveOwner(
|
||||
companyId: string,
|
||||
principalType: PrincipalType,
|
||||
status: string,
|
||||
membershipRole: string | null,
|
||||
tx: Pick<Db, "select">,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if (
|
||||
principalType !== "user" ||
|
||||
status !== "active" ||
|
||||
membershipRole !== "owner"
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const activeOwnerCount = await tx
|
||||
.select({ id: companyMemberships.id })
|
||||
.from(companyMemberships)
|
||||
.where(
|
||||
and(
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.companyId, companyId),
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.principalType, "user"),
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.status, "active"),
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.membershipRole, "owner"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.then((rows) => rows.length);
|
||||
if (activeOwnerCount <= 1) {
|
||||
throw conflict("Cannot remove the last active owner");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function assertAssignableArchiveTarget(
|
||||
companyId: string,
|
||||
input: MemberArchiveInput["reassignment"],
|
||||
tx: Pick<Db, "select">,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if (!input?.assigneeAgentId && !input?.assigneeUserId) return;
|
||||
if (input.assigneeAgentId && input.assigneeUserId) {
|
||||
throw conflict("Choose either an agent or user reassignment target");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (input.assigneeUserId) {
|
||||
const membership = await tx
|
||||
.select({ id: companyMemberships.id })
|
||||
.from(companyMemberships)
|
||||
.where(
|
||||
and(
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.companyId, companyId),
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.principalType, "user"),
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.principalId, input.assigneeUserId),
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.status, "active"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
||||
if (!membership) {
|
||||
throw conflict("Replacement user must be an active company member");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const agent = await tx
|
||||
.select({
|
||||
id: agents.id,
|
||||
companyId: agents.companyId,
|
||||
status: agents.status,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.from(agents)
|
||||
.where(eq(agents.id, input.assigneeAgentId!))
|
||||
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
||||
if (!agent || agent.companyId !== companyId) {
|
||||
throw conflict("Replacement agent must belong to the same company");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (agent.status === "pending_approval" || agent.status === "terminated") {
|
||||
throw conflict("Replacement agent must be assignable");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function archiveMember(companyId: string, memberId: string, input: MemberArchiveInput = {}) {
|
||||
return db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
await tx.execute(sql`
|
||||
select ${companyMemberships.id}
|
||||
from ${companyMemberships}
|
||||
where ${companyMemberships.companyId} = ${companyId}
|
||||
and ${companyMemberships.principalType} = 'user'
|
||||
and ${companyMemberships.status} = 'active'
|
||||
and ${companyMemberships.membershipRole} = 'owner'
|
||||
for update
|
||||
`);
|
||||
|
||||
const existing = await tx
|
||||
.select()
|
||||
.from(companyMemberships)
|
||||
.where(and(eq(companyMemberships.companyId, companyId), eq(companyMemberships.id, memberId)))
|
||||
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
||||
if (!existing) return null;
|
||||
if (existing.principalType !== "user") {
|
||||
throw conflict("Only human company members can be archived");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (existing.status === "archived") {
|
||||
return { member: existing, reassignedIssueCount: 0 };
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (input.reassignment?.assigneeUserId === existing.principalId) {
|
||||
throw conflict("Replacement user cannot be the archived member");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
await assertCanRemoveActiveOwner(
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
existing.principalType,
|
||||
existing.status,
|
||||
existing.membershipRole,
|
||||
tx,
|
||||
);
|
||||
await assertAssignableArchiveTarget(companyId, input.reassignment, tx);
|
||||
|
||||
const now = new Date();
|
||||
const assignmentPatch = {
|
||||
assigneeAgentId: input.reassignment?.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
||||
assigneeUserId: input.reassignment?.assigneeUserId ?? null,
|
||||
updatedAt: now,
|
||||
};
|
||||
const assignedOpenIssueWhere = and(
|
||||
eq(issues.companyId, companyId),
|
||||
eq(issues.assigneeUserId, existing.principalId),
|
||||
sql`${issues.status} not in ('done', 'cancelled')`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
const resetInProgress = await tx
|
||||
.update(issues)
|
||||
.set({
|
||||
...assignmentPatch,
|
||||
status: "todo",
|
||||
startedAt: null,
|
||||
checkoutRunId: null,
|
||||
executionRunId: null,
|
||||
executionLockedAt: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.where(and(assignedOpenIssueWhere, eq(issues.status, "in_progress")))
|
||||
.returning({ id: issues.id });
|
||||
const reassigned = await tx
|
||||
.update(issues)
|
||||
.set(assignmentPatch)
|
||||
.where(and(assignedOpenIssueWhere, ne(issues.status, "in_progress")))
|
||||
.returning({ id: issues.id });
|
||||
|
||||
await tx
|
||||
.delete(principalPermissionGrants)
|
||||
.where(
|
||||
and(
|
||||
eq(principalPermissionGrants.companyId, companyId),
|
||||
eq(principalPermissionGrants.principalType, existing.principalType),
|
||||
eq(principalPermissionGrants.principalId, existing.principalId),
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const archived = await tx
|
||||
.update(companyMemberships)
|
||||
.set({
|
||||
status: "archived",
|
||||
updatedAt: now,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.where(eq(companyMemberships.id, existing.id))
|
||||
.returning()
|
||||
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? existing);
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
member: archived,
|
||||
reassignedIssueCount: resetInProgress.length + reassigned.length,
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function promoteInstanceAdmin(userId: string) {
|
||||
const existing = await db
|
||||
.select()
|
||||
@@ -272,19 +451,81 @@ export function accessService(db: Db) {
|
||||
.orderBy(sql`${companyMemberships.createdAt} desc`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function setUserCompanyAccess(userId: string, companyIds: string[]) {
|
||||
async function setUserCompanyAccess(
|
||||
userId: string,
|
||||
companyIds: string[],
|
||||
options: { actorUserId?: string | null } = {},
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const existing = await listUserCompanyAccess(userId);
|
||||
const existingByCompany = new Map(existing.map((row) => [row.companyId, row]));
|
||||
const target = new Set(companyIds);
|
||||
|
||||
await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
const toDelete = existing.filter((row) => !target.has(row.companyId)).map((row) => row.id);
|
||||
if (toDelete.length > 0) {
|
||||
await tx.delete(companyMemberships).where(inArray(companyMemberships.id, toDelete));
|
||||
const toArchive = existing.filter((row) => !target.has(row.companyId) && row.status !== "archived");
|
||||
if (toArchive.length > 0 && options.actorUserId && options.actorUserId === userId) {
|
||||
throw conflict("You cannot remove yourself");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (toArchive.length > 0 && (await isInstanceAdmin(userId))) {
|
||||
throw conflict("Instance admins cannot be removed from company access");
|
||||
}
|
||||
const protectedArchives = toArchive.filter((row) => row.membershipRole === "owner" || row.membershipRole === "admin");
|
||||
if (protectedArchives.length > 0) {
|
||||
throw conflict("Owners and admins cannot be removed from company access");
|
||||
}
|
||||
const activeOwnerArchives = toArchive.filter(
|
||||
(row) => row.status === "active" && row.membershipRole === "owner",
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (activeOwnerArchives.length > 0) {
|
||||
const activeOwnerRows = await tx
|
||||
.select({ companyId: companyMemberships.companyId, id: companyMemberships.id })
|
||||
.from(companyMemberships)
|
||||
.where(
|
||||
and(
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.principalType, "user"),
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.status, "active"),
|
||||
eq(companyMemberships.membershipRole, "owner"),
|
||||
inArray(companyMemberships.companyId, activeOwnerArchives.map((row) => row.companyId)),
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
for (const row of activeOwnerArchives) {
|
||||
const remainingOwners =
|
||||
activeOwnerRows.filter((owner) => owner.companyId === row.companyId).length - 1;
|
||||
if (remainingOwners <= 0) {
|
||||
throw conflict("Cannot remove the last active owner");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (toArchive.length > 0) {
|
||||
await tx
|
||||
.update(companyMemberships)
|
||||
.set({ status: "archived", updatedAt: new Date() })
|
||||
.where(inArray(companyMemberships.id, toArchive.map((row) => row.id)));
|
||||
await tx
|
||||
.delete(principalPermissionGrants)
|
||||
.where(
|
||||
and(
|
||||
eq(principalPermissionGrants.principalType, "user"),
|
||||
eq(principalPermissionGrants.principalId, userId),
|
||||
inArray(principalPermissionGrants.companyId, toArchive.map((row) => row.companyId)),
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (const companyId of target) {
|
||||
if (existingByCompany.has(companyId)) continue;
|
||||
const existingMembership = existingByCompany.get(companyId);
|
||||
if (existingMembership) {
|
||||
if (existingMembership.status !== "active") {
|
||||
await tx
|
||||
.update(companyMemberships)
|
||||
.set({
|
||||
status: "active",
|
||||
membershipRole: existingMembership.membershipRole ?? "operator",
|
||||
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.where(eq(companyMemberships.id, existingMembership.id));
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
await tx.insert(companyMemberships).values({
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
principalType: "user",
|
||||
@@ -535,6 +776,7 @@ export function accessService(db: Db) {
|
||||
listMembers,
|
||||
listActiveUserMemberships,
|
||||
copyActiveUserMemberships,
|
||||
archiveMember,
|
||||
setMemberPermissions,
|
||||
updateMemberAndPermissions,
|
||||
promoteInstanceAdmin,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user