# 2026-03-14 Adapter Skill Sync Rollout Status: Implemented for local adapters; gateway remains unsupported Date: 2026-03-14 Audience: Product and engineering Related: - `doc/plans/2026-03-14-skills-ui-product-plan.md` - `doc/plans/2026-03-13-company-import-export-v2.md` - `docs/companies/companies-spec.md` ## 1. Purpose This document defines the rollout plan for adapter-wide skill support in Paperclip. The goal is not just “show a skills tab.” The goal is: - every adapter has a deliberate skill-sync truth model - the UI tells the truth for that adapter - Paperclip stores desired skill state consistently even when the adapter cannot fully reconcile it - unsupported adapters degrade clearly and safely ## 2. Current Adapter Matrix Paperclip currently has these adapters: - `claude_local` - `codex_local` - `cursor` - `gemini_local` - `grok_local` - `acpx_local` - `opencode_local` - `pi_local` - `openclaw_gateway` The current skill API supports: - `unsupported` - `persistent` - `ephemeral` Current implementation state: - `codex_local`: implemented, `ephemeral` - `claude_local`: implemented, `ephemeral` - `cursor`: implemented, `persistent` - `gemini_local`: implemented, `persistent` - `pi_local`: implemented, `persistent` - `opencode_local`: implemented, `persistent`, with shared Claude skills home caveats - `acpx_local`: implemented, `ephemeral` for Claude/Codex sub-agents and `unsupported` for custom commands - `grok_local`: implemented, `ephemeral` - `openclaw_gateway`: not yet implemented; blocked on gateway protocol support, so `unsupported` for now ## 3. Product Principles 1. Desired skills live in Paperclip for every adapter. 2. Adapters may expose different truth models, and the UI must reflect that honestly. 3. Persistent adapters should read and reconcile actual installed state. 4. Ephemeral adapters should report effective runtime state, not pretend they own a persistent install. 5. Shared-home adapters need stronger safeguards than isolated-home adapters. 6. Gateway or cloud adapters must not fake local filesystem sync. ## 4. Adapter Classification ### 4.1 Persistent local-home adapters These adapters have a stable local skills directory that Paperclip can read and manage. Candidates: - `cursor` - `gemini_local` - `pi_local` - `opencode_local` with caveats Expected UX: - show actual installed skills - show managed vs external skills - support `sync` - support stale removal - preserve unknown external skills ### 4.2 Ephemeral mount adapters These adapters do not have a meaningful Paperclip-owned persistent install state. Current adapter: - `codex_local` - `claude_local` - `acpx_local` when configured for Claude or Codex - `grok_local` Expected UX: - show desired Paperclip skills - show any discoverable external dirs if available - say “mounted on next run” instead of “installed” - do not imply a persistent adapter-owned install state ### 4.3 Unsupported / remote adapters These adapters cannot support skill sync without new external capabilities. Current adapter: - `acpx_local` when configured for custom commands - `openclaw_gateway` Expected UX: - company skill library still works - agent attachment UI still works at the desired-state level - actual adapter state is `unsupported` - sync button is disabled or replaced with explanatory text ## 5. Per-Adapter Plan ### 5.1 Codex Local Target mode: - `ephemeral` Current state: - already implemented Requirements to finish: - keep runtime-mounted snapshots separate from persistent install snapshots - ensure imported company skills can be attached and mounted without manual path work - keep `CODEX_HOME/skills` mutation scoped to heartbeat execution, not `skills/sync` Success criteria: - desired skills are stored in Paperclip - selected skills are linked into the effective `CODEX_HOME/skills` during runs - no persistent installed/stale state is reported from `skills/sync` ### 5.2 Claude Local Target mode: - `ephemeral` Current state: - already implemented Requirements to finish: - polish status language in UI - clearly distinguish “desired” from “mounted on next run” - optionally surface configured external skill dirs if Claude exposes them Success criteria: - desired skills stored in Paperclip - selected skills mounted per run - no misleading “installed” language ### 5.3 Cursor Local Target mode: - `persistent` Technical basis: - Paperclip reconciles desired skills into `~/.cursor/skills` Current state: - implemented Testing: - unit tests for discovery - unit tests for sync and stale removal - verify shared auth/session setup is not disturbed Success criteria: - Cursor agents show real installed state - syncing from the agent Skills tab works ### 5.4 Gemini Local Target mode: - `persistent` Technical basis: - Paperclip reconciles desired skills into `~/.gemini/skills` Current state: - implemented Potential caveat: - if Gemini treats that skills directory as shared user state, the UI should warn before removing stale managed skills Success criteria: - Gemini agents can reconcile desired vs actual skill state ### 5.5 Pi Local Target mode: - `persistent` Technical basis: - Paperclip reconciles desired skills into `~/.pi/agent/skills` Current state: - implemented Success criteria: - Pi agents expose actual installed skill state - Paperclip can sync desired skills into Pi’s persistent home ### 5.6 OpenCode Local Target mode: - `persistent` Special case: - OpenCode currently injects Paperclip skills into `~/.claude/skills` This is product-risky because: - it shares state with Claude - Paperclip may accidentally imply the skills belong only to OpenCode when the home is shared Plan: - implemented `listSkills` and `syncSkills` - treat it as `persistent` - explicitly label the home as shared in UI copy - only remove stale managed Paperclip skills that are clearly marked as Paperclip-managed Phase 2: - investigate whether OpenCode supports its own isolated skills home - if yes, migrate to an adapter-specific home and remove the shared-home caveat Success criteria: - OpenCode agents show real state - shared-home risk is visible and bounded ### 5.7 OpenClaw Gateway Target mode: - `unsupported` until gateway protocol support exists Required external work: - gateway API to list installed/available skills - gateway API to install/remove or otherwise reconcile skills - gateway metadata for whether state is persistent or ephemeral Until then: - Paperclip stores desired skills only - UI shows unsupported actual state - no fake sync implementation Future target: - likely a fourth truth model eventually, such as remote-managed persistent state - for now, keep the current API and treat gateway as unsupported ### 5.8 ACPX Local Target mode: - `ephemeral` for built-in Claude/Codex ACPX sub-agents - `unsupported` for custom ACP commands Success criteria: - Claude/Codex ACPX snapshots show skills as configured for the next session - custom command snapshots keep desired skills tracked only and do not imply runtime sync ### 5.9 Grok Local Target mode: - `ephemeral` Success criteria: - desired skills are stored in Paperclip - selected skills are copied into the execution workspace for the next run - no persistent installed/stale state is reported from `skills/sync` ## 6. API Plan ## 6.1 Keep the current minimal adapter API Near-term adapter contract remains: - `listSkills(ctx)` - `syncSkills(ctx, desiredSkills)` This is enough for all local adapters. ## 6.2 Optional extension points Add only if needed after the first broad rollout: - `skillHomeLabel` - `sharedHome: boolean` - `supportsExternalDiscovery: boolean` - `supportsDestructiveSync: boolean` These should be optional metadata additions to the snapshot, not required new adapter methods. ## 7. UI Plan The company-level skill library can stay adapter-neutral. The agent-level Skills tab must become adapter-aware by copy and status: - `persistent`: installed / missing / stale / external - `ephemeral`: mounted on next run / external / desired only - `unsupported`: desired only, adapter cannot report actual state Additional UI requirement for shared-home adapters: - show a small warning that the adapter uses a shared user skills home - avoid destructive wording unless Paperclip can prove a skill is Paperclip-managed ## 8. Rollout Phases ### Phase 1: Finish the local filesystem family Ship: - `cursor` - `gemini_local` - `pi_local` Status: - implemented ### Phase 2: OpenCode shared-home support Ship: - `opencode_local` Status: - implemented with shared Claude skills-home warning ### Phase 3: Gateway support decision Decide: - keep `openclaw_gateway` unsupported for V1 - or extend the gateway protocol for remote skill management My recommendation: - do not block V1 on gateway support - keep it explicitly unsupported until the remote protocol exists ## 9. Definition Of Done Adapter-wide skill support is ready when all are true: 1. Every adapter has an explicit truth model: - `persistent` - `ephemeral` - `unsupported` 2. The UI copy matches that truth model. 3. All local persistent adapters implement: - `listSkills` - `syncSkills` 4. Tests cover: - desired-state storage - actual-state discovery - managed vs external distinctions - stale managed-skill cleanup where supported 5. `openclaw_gateway` is either: - explicitly unsupported with clean UX - or backed by a real remote skill API ## 10. Recommendation The recommended immediate order is: 1. `cursor` 2. `gemini_local` 3. `pi_local` 4. `opencode_local` 5. defer `openclaw_gateway` The local-adapter family now has explicit truth models. The remaining V1 boundary is `openclaw_gateway`, which should stay unsupported until the gateway protocol can report real remote skill state.