Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/cli-auth-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta 32a9165ddf [codex] harden authenticated routes and issue editor reliability (#3741)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - The control plane depends on authenticated routes enforcing company
boundaries and role permissions correctly
> - This branch also touches the issue detail and markdown editing flows
operators use while handling advisory and triage work
> - Partial issue cache seeds and fragile rich-editor parsing could
leave important issue content missing or blank at the moment an operator
needed it
> - Blocked issues becoming actionable again should wake their assignee
automatically instead of silently staying idle
> - This pull request rebases the advisory follow-up branch onto current
`master`, hardens authenticated route authorization, and carries the
issue-detail/editor reliability fixes forward with regression tests
> - The benefit is tighter authz on sensitive routes plus more reliable
issue/advisory editing and wakeup behavior on top of the latest base

## What Changed

- Hardened authenticated route authorization across agent, activity,
approval, access, project, plugin, health, execution-workspace,
portability, and related server paths, with new cross-tenant and
runtime-authz regression coverage.
- Switched issue detail queries from `initialData` to placeholder-based
hydration so list/quicklook seeds still refetch full issue bodies.
- Normalized advisory-style HTML images before mounting the markdown
editor and strengthened fallback behavior when the rich editor silently
fails or rejects the content.
- Woke assigned agents when blocked issues move back to `todo`, with
route coverage for reopen and unblock transitions.
- Rebasing note: this branch now sits cleanly on top of the latest
`master` tip used for the PR base.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issueDetailQuery.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/activity-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts`
- Confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not part of the PR diff.
- Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` before publishing.

## Risks

- Broad authz tightening may expose existing flows that were relying on
permissive board or agent access and now need explicit grants.
- Markdown editor fallback changes could affect focus or rendering in
edge-case content that mixes HTML-like advisory markup with normal
markdown.
- This verification was intentionally scoped to touched regressions and
did not run the full repository suite.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in the Codex CLI environment
with tool use for terminal, git, and GitHub operations. The exact
runtime model identifier is not exposed inside this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, it is behavior-only and does not
need before/after screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes, or no
documentation changes were needed for these internal fixes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-15 08:41:15 -05:00

286 lines
8.9 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
isInstanceAdmin: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
canUser: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockBoardAuthService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
createCliAuthChallenge: vi.fn(),
describeCliAuthChallenge: vi.fn(),
approveCliAuthChallenge: vi.fn(),
cancelCliAuthChallenge: vi.fn(),
resolveBoardAccess: vi.fn(),
resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds: vi.fn(),
assertCurrentBoardKey: vi.fn(),
revokeBoardApiKey: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn());
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
boardAuthService: () => mockBoardAuthService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
notifyHireApproved: vi.fn(),
deduplicateAgentName: vi.fn((name: string) => name),
}));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
boardAuthService: () => mockBoardAuthService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
notifyHireApproved: vi.fn(),
deduplicateAgentName: vi.fn((name: string) => name),
}));
}
async function createApp(actor: any, db: any = {} as any) {
const [{ accessRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/access.js")>("../routes/access.js"),
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
req.actor = actor;
next();
});
app.use(
"/api",
accessRoutes(db, {
deploymentMode: "authenticated",
deploymentExposure: "private",
bindHost: "127.0.0.1",
allowedHostnames: [],
}),
);
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
describe("cli auth routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("../routes/access.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.resetAllMocks();
});
it("creates a CLI auth challenge with approval metadata", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.createCliAuthChallenge.mockResolvedValue({
challenge: {
id: "challenge-1",
expiresAt: new Date("2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z"),
},
challengeSecret: "pcp_cli_auth_secret",
pendingBoardToken: "pcp_board_token",
});
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" });
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/cli-auth/challenges")
.send({
command: "paperclipai company import",
clientName: "paperclipai cli",
requestedAccess: "board",
});
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(res.body).toMatchObject({
id: "challenge-1",
token: "pcp_cli_auth_secret",
approvalPath: "/cli-auth/challenge-1?token=pcp_cli_auth_secret",
pollPath: "/cli-auth/challenges/challenge-1",
expiresAt: "2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z",
});
expect(res.body.boardApiToken).toBe("pcp_board_token");
expect(res.body.approvalUrl).toContain("/cli-auth/challenge-1?token=pcp_cli_auth_secret");
});
it("rejects anonymous access to generic skill documents", async () => {
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" });
const [indexRes, skillRes] = await Promise.all([
request(app).get("/api/skills/index"),
request(app).get("/api/skills/paperclip"),
]);
expect(indexRes.status).toBe(401);
expect(skillRes.status).toBe(401);
});
it("serves the invite-scoped paperclip skill anonymously for active invites", async () => {
const invite = {
id: "invite-1",
companyId: "company-1",
inviteType: "company_join",
allowedJoinTypes: "agent",
tokenHash: "hash",
defaultsPayload: null,
expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 60_000),
invitedByUserId: null,
revokedAt: null,
acceptedAt: null,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
};
const db = {
select: vi.fn(() => ({
from: vi.fn(() => ({
where: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([invite]),
})),
})),
};
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" }, db);
const res = await request(app).get("/api/invites/token-123/skills/paperclip");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.headers["content-type"]).toContain("text/markdown");
expect(res.text).toContain("# Paperclip Skill");
});
it("marks challenge status as requiring sign-in for anonymous viewers", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.describeCliAuthChallenge.mockResolvedValue({
id: "challenge-1",
status: "pending",
command: "paperclipai company import",
clientName: "paperclipai cli",
requestedAccess: "board",
requestedCompanyId: null,
requestedCompanyName: null,
approvedAt: null,
cancelledAt: null,
expiresAt: "2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z",
approvedByUser: null,
});
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" });
const res = await request(app).get("/api/cli-auth/challenges/challenge-1?token=pcp_cli_auth_secret");
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body.requiresSignIn).toBe(true);
expect(res.body.canApprove).toBe(false);
});
it("approves a CLI auth challenge for a signed-in board user", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.approveCliAuthChallenge.mockResolvedValue({
status: "approved",
challenge: {
id: "challenge-1",
boardApiKeyId: "board-key-1",
requestedAccess: "board",
requestedCompanyId: "company-1",
expiresAt: new Date("2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z"),
},
});
mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardAccess.mockResolvedValue({
user: { id: "user-1", name: "User One", email: "user@example.com" },
companyIds: ["company-1"],
isInstanceAdmin: false,
});
mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/cli-auth/challenges/challenge-1/approve")
.send({ token: "pcp_cli_auth_secret" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockBoardAuthService.approveCliAuthChallenge).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"challenge-1",
"pcp_cli_auth_secret",
"user-1",
);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
companyId: "company-1",
action: "board_api_key.created",
}),
);
});
it("logs approve activity for instance admins without company memberships", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.approveCliAuthChallenge.mockResolvedValue({
status: "approved",
challenge: {
id: "challenge-2",
boardApiKeyId: "board-key-2",
requestedAccess: "instance_admin_required",
requestedCompanyId: null,
expiresAt: new Date("2026-03-23T13:00:00.000Z"),
},
});
mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-a", "company-b"]);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "admin-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
companyIds: [],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/cli-auth/challenges/challenge-2/approve")
.send({ token: "pcp_cli_auth_secret" });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
userId: "admin-1",
requestedCompanyId: null,
boardApiKeyId: "board-key-2",
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
it("logs revoke activity with resolved audit company ids", async () => {
mockBoardAuthService.assertCurrentBoardKey.mockResolvedValue({
id: "board-key-3",
userId: "admin-2",
});
mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-z"]);
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "admin-2",
keyId: "board-key-3",
source: "board_key",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
companyIds: [],
});
const res = await request(app).post("/api/cli-auth/revoke-current").send({});
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockBoardAuthService.resolveBoardActivityCompanyIds).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
userId: "admin-2",
boardApiKeyId: "board-key-3",
});
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
expect.objectContaining({
companyId: "company-z",
action: "board_api_key.revoked",
}),
);
});
});