Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/issue-workspace-command-authz.test.ts
T
Dotta 32a9165ddf [codex] harden authenticated routes and issue editor reliability (#3741)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies
> - The control plane depends on authenticated routes enforcing company
boundaries and role permissions correctly
> - This branch also touches the issue detail and markdown editing flows
operators use while handling advisory and triage work
> - Partial issue cache seeds and fragile rich-editor parsing could
leave important issue content missing or blank at the moment an operator
needed it
> - Blocked issues becoming actionable again should wake their assignee
automatically instead of silently staying idle
> - This pull request rebases the advisory follow-up branch onto current
`master`, hardens authenticated route authorization, and carries the
issue-detail/editor reliability fixes forward with regression tests
> - The benefit is tighter authz on sensitive routes plus more reliable
issue/advisory editing and wakeup behavior on top of the latest base

## What Changed

- Hardened authenticated route authorization across agent, activity,
approval, access, project, plugin, health, execution-workspace,
portability, and related server paths, with new cross-tenant and
runtime-authz regression coverage.
- Switched issue detail queries from `initialData` to placeholder-based
hydration so list/quicklook seeds still refetch full issue bodies.
- Normalized advisory-style HTML images before mounting the markdown
editor and strengthened fallback behavior when the rich editor silently
fails or rejects the content.
- Woke assigned agents when blocked issues move back to `todo`, with
route coverage for reopen and unblock transitions.
- Rebasing note: this branch now sits cleanly on top of the latest
`master` tip used for the PR base.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issueDetailQuery.test.tsx
ui/src/components/MarkdownEditor.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/activity-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts`
- Confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not part of the PR diff.
- Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` before publishing.

## Risks

- Broad authz tightening may expose existing flows that were relying on
permissive board or agent access and now need explicit grants.
- Markdown editor fallback changes could affect focus or rendering in
edge-case content that mixes HTML-like advisory markup with normal
markdown.
- This verification was intentionally scoped to touched regressions and
did not run the full repository suite.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in the Codex CLI environment
with tool use for terminal, git, and GitHub operations. The exact
runtime model identifier is not exposed inside this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, it is behavior-only and does not
need before/after screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes, or no
documentation changes were needed for these internal fixes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-15 08:41:15 -05:00

166 lines
4.9 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { errorHandler } from "../middleware/index.js";
import { issueRoutes } from "../routes/issues.js";
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
addComment: vi.fn(),
assertCheckoutOwner: vi.fn(),
create: vi.fn(),
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
getById: vi.fn(),
getRelationSummaries: vi.fn(),
getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion: vi.fn(),
listWakeableBlockedDependents: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => ({
canUser: vi.fn(async () => true),
hasPermission: vi.fn(async () => true),
}),
agentService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
documentService: () => ({}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
feedbackService: () => ({
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
}),
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}),
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
logActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = actor;
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
function makeIssue(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
return {
id: "issue-1",
companyId: "company-1",
status: "todo",
priority: "medium",
projectId: null,
goalId: null,
parentId: null,
assigneeAgentId: null,
assigneeUserId: null,
createdByUserId: "board-user",
identifier: "PAP-1000",
title: "Workspace authz",
executionPolicy: null,
executionState: null,
executionWorkspaceId: null,
hiddenAt: null,
...overrides,
};
}
describe("issue workspace command authorization", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockIssueService.addComment.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockIssueService.create.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
mockIssueService.findMentionedAgents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.getByIdentifier.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockIssueService.getRelationSummaries.mockResolvedValue({ blockedBy: [], blocks: [] });
mockIssueService.getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockIssueService.listWakeableBlockedDependents.mockResolvedValue([]);
mockIssueService.assertCheckoutOwner.mockResolvedValue({ adoptedFromRunId: null });
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
});
it("rejects agent callers that create issue workspace provision commands", async () => {
const app = createApp({
type: "agent",
agentId: "agent-1",
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-1",
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/companies/company-1/issues")
.send({
title: "Exploit",
executionWorkspaceSettings: {
workspaceStrategy: {
type: "git_worktree",
provisionCommand: "touch /tmp/paperclip-rce",
},
},
});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("host-executed workspace commands");
expect(mockIssueService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects agent callers that patch assignee adapter workspace teardown commands", async () => {
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
const app = createApp({
type: "agent",
agentId: "agent-1",
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-1",
});
const res = await request(app)
.patch("/api/issues/issue-1")
.send({
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
adapterConfig: {
workspaceStrategy: {
type: "git_worktree",
teardownCommand: "rm -rf /tmp/paperclip-rce",
},
},
},
});
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("host-executed workspace commands");
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});