Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/fixtures/plugin-worker-invocation-scope.cjs
T
Dotta 38c185fb8b [codex] Add agent permissions and controls plan (#6386)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies by keeping
task ownership, approvals, and operator control inside one control
plane.
> - Agent permissions and plugin-hosted company settings sit on the
boundary between autonomy and governance.
> - V1 needs scoped task assignment rules, plugin extension points, and
clearer company access surfaces without weakening company boundaries.
> - The branch builds the core authorization service, plugin SDK/host
APIs, and UI simplifications needed to support those controls.
> - Paperclip EE plugin surfaces were intentionally moved out of this
core PR per review direction, so this PR now carries only the public
core/plugin infrastructure work.
> - The latest updates preserve the PAP-9937 branch changes that belong
in this PR, remove the `design/` artifacts, and exclude the experimental
`plugin-briefs` package.
> - Greptile feedback was applied through the authorization/audit paths
and the final cleanup commit was re-reviewed at 5/5 with no unresolved
Greptile threads.
> - The benefit is safer assignment control with extension hooks for
richer permission products while preserving simple defaults for normal
operators.

## What Changed

- Added scoped task-assignment authorization decisions and routed
issue/agent assignment mutations through the authorization service.
- Added plugin SDK and host APIs for company settings slots,
authorization policy/grant management, assignment previews, and bridge
invocation scope propagation.
- Simplified core company access UI and moved advanced controls behind
plugin-provided settings surfaces.
- Added retry-now affordances for blocked issue next-step notices.
- Added protected-assignment enforcement for persisted
agent/project/issue policies, including explicit-grant fallback
behavior.
- Added incremental principal-access compatibility backfill for active
agent memberships and role-default human permission grants.
- Added the Markdown code block wrap action fix from the latest branch
changes.
- Removed `design/` artifacts from the PR and removed
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs` from the final diff.
- Addressed Greptile feedback for plugin actor sanitization, legacy
membership handling, audit pagination, unknown grant-scope metadata, and
startup test mocks.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 2 files passed, 54
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts` -> 3 files passed, 62
tests passed.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/plugin-access-authorization-host-services.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` -> 3 files
passed, 28 tests passed.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` -> passed.
- `git diff --check` -> passed.
- `node ./scripts/check-docker-deps-stage.mjs` -> passed.
- `CI=true pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` -> passed
with no lockfile update.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
ui/src/components/MarkdownBody.interaction.test.tsx` -> 1 test passed.
- `git ls-files design packages/plugins/plugin-briefs | wc -l` -> 0.
- GitHub CI on `40cd83b53` -> all checks passed, merge state `CLEAN`.
- Greptile on `40cd83b53` -> 5/5, 102 files reviewed, 0
comments/annotations added, 0 unresolved review threads.
- Confirmed the PR diff contains no `design/`,
`packages/plugins/plugin-briefs`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, or
`.github/workflows` changes.

## Risks

- Medium: task assignment authorization paths are behaviorally stricter
for protected/private policy data, so existing plugin-authored policies
may block assignment until explicit grants or approval flows are
configured.
- Medium: plugin-host authorization APIs expand the surface area
available to trusted plugins and need careful review for company
scoping.
- Low: startup now performs a principal-access compatibility backfill,
but the migration and runtime backfill use conflict-tolerant inserts.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled workflow with shell,
git, and GitHub CLI access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-22 08:12:52 -05:00

101 lines
2.1 KiB
JavaScript

const readline = require("node:readline");
let nextRequestId = 1;
const pendingNested = new Map();
function send(message) {
process.stdout.write(`${JSON.stringify(message)}\n`);
}
function sendNestedHostRequest(originalRequest, invocationId) {
const nestedId = `nested-${nextRequestId++}`;
const params = originalRequest.params?.params ?? {};
const mode = params.mode;
const requestedCompanyId = params.requestedCompanyId;
const nestedRequest = {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: nestedId,
method: "companies.get",
params: {
companyId: requestedCompanyId,
},
};
if (mode === "echo") {
nestedRequest.paperclipInvocationId = invocationId;
} else if (mode === "unknown") {
nestedRequest.paperclipInvocationId = "unknown-invocation";
}
pendingNested.set(nestedId, originalRequest.id);
send(nestedRequest);
}
const rl = readline.createInterface({
input: process.stdin,
crlfDelay: Infinity,
});
rl.on("line", (line) => {
if (!line.trim()) return;
const message = JSON.parse(line);
if (message.id && pendingNested.has(message.id)) {
const originalId = pendingNested.get(message.id);
pendingNested.delete(message.id);
if (message.error) {
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: originalId,
error: message.error,
});
return;
}
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: originalId,
result: message.result,
});
return;
}
const method = message && typeof message.method === "string" ? message.method : null;
if (method === "initialize") {
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: message.id,
result: {
ok: true,
supportedMethods: ["getData"],
},
});
return;
}
if (method === "getData") {
sendNestedHostRequest(message, message.paperclipInvocation?.id);
return;
}
if (method === "shutdown") {
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: message.id,
result: {},
});
setImmediate(() => process.exit(0));
return;
}
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: message.id,
error: {
code: -32601,
message: `Unhandled method: ${method}`,
},
});
});