forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
1991ec9d6f
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, so backend task ownership, recovery, review visibility, and company-scoped limits need to stay enforceable without UI-only coupling. > - Closed PR #4692 bundled those backend changes with UI workflow, docs, skills, workflow, and lockfile churn. > - PAP-2694 asks for a clean backend/control-plane slice from that closed branch. > - This branch starts from current `master` and mines only the `cli`, `packages/db`, `packages/shared`, and `server` contracts/tests needed for the backend behavior. > - It explicitly excludes UI workflow/performance work, `.github/workflows/pr.yml`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, docs, skills, package-script, adapter UI build-config, and perf fixture script changes; the only UI files are fixture/test updates required by the tightened shared `Company` contract. > - The benefit is a smaller reviewable PR that preserves the control-plane fixes while staying under Greptile s 100-file review limit. ## What Changed - Added company-scoped attachment-size limits through DB schema/migrations, shared company portability contracts, CLI import/export coverage, and server attachment upload enforcement. - Added productivity review service/API behavior for no-comment streak, long-active, and high-churn review issues, including request-depth clamping and issue summary exposure. - Hardened issue ownership and recovery/control-plane paths: peer-agent mutation denial, issue tree pause/resume behavior, stranded recovery origins, and related activity/test coverage. - Preserved related backend contract updates for routine timestamp variables and managed agent instruction bundles because they live in shared/server contracts from the source branch. - Addressed Greptile feedback by making `Company.attachmentMaxBytes` non-optional, simplifying review request-depth clamping, fixing the migration final newline, and enforcing the process-level attachment cap as the final ceiling for uploads. - Added minimal company fixtures needed for repo-wide typecheck/build and kept the PR to 66 changed files with forbidden/non-slice paths excluded. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` - `git diff --name-only origin/master..HEAD | wc -l` -> 66 files - `git diff --name-only origin/master..HEAD -- .github/workflows/pr.yml pnpm-lock.yaml package.json doc skills .agents scripts packages/adapters` -> no output - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts packages/shared/src/routine-variables.test.ts packages/shared/src/adapter-types.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company.test.ts server/src/__tests__/productivity-review-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-control-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-control-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-attachment-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts` -> 12 files, 147 tests passed - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-delete.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts server/src/__tests__/productivity-review-service.test.ts` -> 3 files, 18 tests passed - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-attachment-routes.test.ts` -> 1 file, 6 tests passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter paperclipai typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` ## Risks - Includes migrations `0073_shiny_salo.sql` and `0074_striped_genesis.sql`; merge ordering matters if another PR adds migrations first. - This is intentionally backend-only apart from fixture/test updates forced by shared type correctness; UI affordances from PR #4692 are not present here and should land in separate UI slices. - The worktree install emitted plugin SDK bin-link warnings for unbuilt plugin packages, but the targeted tests and package typechecks completed successfully. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected; check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled terminal/GitHub workflow. Exact runtime context window was not exposed by the harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
323 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
323 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const issueId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
|
|
const companyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockDocumentsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
listIssueDocuments: vi.fn(),
|
|
listIssueDocumentRevisions: vi.fn(),
|
|
restoreIssueDocumentRevision: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
})),
|
|
getExperimental: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
|
|
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" })),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => [companyId]),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const planDocument = {
|
|
id: "document-1",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
issueId,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
title: "Plan",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# Plan",
|
|
latestRevisionId: "revision-2",
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: 2,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
updatedByAgentId: null,
|
|
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const systemDocument = {
|
|
...planDocument,
|
|
id: "document-2",
|
|
key: "system-plan",
|
|
title: "System plan",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/documents.js", () => ({
|
|
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
|
feedbackService: () => ({}),
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp() {
|
|
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
};
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue document revision routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/agents.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/documents.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
registerModuleMocks();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: issueId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-881",
|
|
title: "Document revisions",
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
});
|
|
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocuments.mockImplementation(
|
|
async (_issueId, options: { includeSystem?: boolean } | undefined) =>
|
|
options?.includeSystem ? [planDocument, systemDocument] : [planDocument],
|
|
);
|
|
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocumentRevisions.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "revision-2",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
documentId: "document-1",
|
|
issueId,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
title: "Plan v2",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# Two",
|
|
changeSummary: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
restoredFromRevisionId: "revision-1",
|
|
restoredFromRevisionNumber: 1,
|
|
document: {
|
|
id: "document-1",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
issueId,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
title: "Plan v1",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# One",
|
|
latestRevisionId: "revision-3",
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: 3,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
updatedByAgentId: null,
|
|
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({});
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" });
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue([companyId]);
|
|
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns revision snapshots including title and format", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions`);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
title: "Plan v2",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# Two",
|
|
}),
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("filters system documents by default on the document list route", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents`);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual([expect.objectContaining({ key: "plan" })]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("passes includeSystem=true through for debug document listing", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(
|
|
`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents?includeSystem=true`,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ key: "plan" }),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ key: "system-plan" }),
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("restores a revision through the append-only route and logs the action", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
issueId,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionId: "revision-1",
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
action: "issue.document_restored",
|
|
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
restoredFromRevisionId: "revision-1",
|
|
restoredFromRevisionNumber: 1,
|
|
revisionNumber: 3,
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual(expect.objectContaining({
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
title: "Plan v1",
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: 3,
|
|
}));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects invalid document keys before attempting restore", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/INVALID KEY/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(400);
|
|
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|