Files
paperclip/ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx
T
Dotta 6b7f6ce4b8 [codex] Split PR #4692 UI/QoL updates (#4701)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents through a company-scoped control
plane.
> - The affected surface is the board UI for issue threads, issue lists,
routines, dialogs, navigation, and issue review indicators.
> - Closed PR #4692 bundled backend, schema, docs, workflow, and UI/QoL
work into one oversized change set.
> - Greptile could not keep reviewing that broad PR because it exceeded
the 100-file review limit and mixed unrelated concerns.
> - This pull request extracts the UI/QoL slice into a fresh branch
under the review limit while leaving workflow and lockfile churn out.
> - The benefit is a focused review path for the board UI performance
and workflow improvements without reopening the oversized PR.

## What Changed

- Added long issue-thread virtualization, scroll-container binding,
anchor preservation, latest-comment jump targeting, and related
regression/perf fixtures.
- Improved issue list scalability with scroll-based loading, server
offset parameters, and pagination-focused UI tests.
- Reduced new issue dialog typing churn and split dialog action
subscriptions so broad layout/nav surfaces avoid unnecessary renders.
- Added routine variables help and routine description mention options
for users, agents, and projects.
- Added productivity review badge/link UI and fixed the badge to use
Paperclip's company-prefixed router link.
- Kept the split PR below Greptile's review limit and excluded
`.github/workflows/pr.yml` and `pnpm-lock.yaml`.

## Verification

- `pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile` in the clean worktree to install
`@tanstack/react-virtual` locally without committing lockfile churn.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run --config
vitest.config.ts src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx
src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx src/pages/Routines.test.tsx
src/pages/Issues.test.tsx` passed: 5 files, 83 tests.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed.
- `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` passed.
- Split-scope checks: 53 changed files; no `.github/workflows/pr.yml`;
no `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
- Screenshots were not captured in this heartbeat; the changes are
primarily virtualization, routing, pagination, and editor behavior
covered by focused regression tests.

## Risks

- Moderate UI risk because issue-thread virtualization changes scroll
behavior on long conversations; regression tests cover anchor jumps,
latest-comment targeting, row metadata, and short-thread fallback.
- Moderate integration risk because the issue-list offset parameter and
productivity review field depend on matching API behavior.
- Dependency risk: the UI package adds `@tanstack/react-virtual` while
repository policy keeps `pnpm-lock.yaml` out of PRs, so CI must resolve
dependency changes through the repo's normal lockfile policy.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled local repository and
GitHub workflow. Exact runtime context window was not exposed by the
harness.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-28 17:18:58 -05:00

157 lines
3.9 KiB
TypeScript

// @vitest-environment jsdom
import { act } from "react";
import type { ReactNode } from "react";
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from "@tanstack/react-query";
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { Sidebar } from "./Sidebar";
const mockHeartbeatsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
liveRunsForCompany: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockInstanceSettingsApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getExperimental: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("@/lib/router", () => ({
NavLink: ({ to, children, className, ...props }: {
to: string;
children: ReactNode;
className?: string | ((state: { isActive: boolean }) => string);
}) => (
<a
href={to}
className={typeof className === "function" ? className({ isActive: false }) : className}
{...props}
>
{children}
</a>
),
}));
vi.mock("../context/DialogContext", () => ({
useDialog: () => ({
openNewIssue: vi.fn(),
}),
useDialogActions: () => ({
openNewIssue: vi.fn(),
}),
}));
vi.mock("../context/CompanyContext", () => ({
useCompany: () => ({
selectedCompanyId: "company-1",
selectedCompany: { id: "company-1", issuePrefix: "PAP", name: "Paperclip" },
}),
}));
vi.mock("../context/SidebarContext", () => ({
useSidebar: () => ({
isMobile: false,
setSidebarOpen: vi.fn(),
}),
}));
vi.mock("../api/heartbeats", () => ({
heartbeatsApi: mockHeartbeatsApi,
}));
vi.mock("../api/instanceSettings", () => ({
instanceSettingsApi: mockInstanceSettingsApi,
}));
vi.mock("../hooks/useInboxBadge", () => ({
useInboxBadge: () => ({ inbox: 0, failedRuns: 0 }),
}));
vi.mock("@/plugins/slots", () => ({
PluginSlotOutlet: () => null,
}));
vi.mock("./SidebarCompanyMenu", () => ({
SidebarCompanyMenu: () => <div>Company menu</div>,
}));
vi.mock("./SidebarProjects", () => ({
SidebarProjects: () => null,
}));
vi.mock("./SidebarAgents", () => ({
SidebarAgents: () => null,
}));
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
(globalThis as any).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true;
async function flushReact() {
await act(async () => {
await Promise.resolve();
await new Promise((resolve) => window.setTimeout(resolve, 0));
});
}
describe("Sidebar", () => {
let container: HTMLDivElement;
beforeEach(() => {
container = document.createElement("div");
document.body.appendChild(container);
mockHeartbeatsApi.liveRunsForCompany.mockResolvedValue([]);
});
afterEach(() => {
container.remove();
document.body.innerHTML = "";
vi.clearAllMocks();
});
it("does not flash the Workspaces link while experimental settings are loading", async () => {
mockInstanceSettingsApi.getExperimental.mockImplementation(() => new Promise(() => {}));
const root = createRoot(container);
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } },
});
await act(async () => {
root.render(
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
<Sidebar />
</QueryClientProvider>,
);
});
await flushReact();
expect(container.textContent).not.toContain("Workspaces");
await act(async () => {
root.unmount();
});
});
it("shows the Workspaces link when isolated workspaces are enabled", async () => {
mockInstanceSettingsApi.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({ enableIsolatedWorkspaces: true });
const root = createRoot(container);
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } },
});
await act(async () => {
root.render(
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
<Sidebar />
</QueryClientProvider>,
);
});
await flushReact();
const link = [...container.querySelectorAll("a")].find((anchor) => anchor.textContent === "Workspaces");
expect(link?.getAttribute("href")).toBe("/workspaces");
await act(async () => {
root.unmount();
});
});
});