forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
1991ec9d6f
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, so backend task ownership, recovery, review visibility, and company-scoped limits need to stay enforceable without UI-only coupling. > - Closed PR #4692 bundled those backend changes with UI workflow, docs, skills, workflow, and lockfile churn. > - PAP-2694 asks for a clean backend/control-plane slice from that closed branch. > - This branch starts from current `master` and mines only the `cli`, `packages/db`, `packages/shared`, and `server` contracts/tests needed for the backend behavior. > - It explicitly excludes UI workflow/performance work, `.github/workflows/pr.yml`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, docs, skills, package-script, adapter UI build-config, and perf fixture script changes; the only UI files are fixture/test updates required by the tightened shared `Company` contract. > - The benefit is a smaller reviewable PR that preserves the control-plane fixes while staying under Greptile s 100-file review limit. ## What Changed - Added company-scoped attachment-size limits through DB schema/migrations, shared company portability contracts, CLI import/export coverage, and server attachment upload enforcement. - Added productivity review service/API behavior for no-comment streak, long-active, and high-churn review issues, including request-depth clamping and issue summary exposure. - Hardened issue ownership and recovery/control-plane paths: peer-agent mutation denial, issue tree pause/resume behavior, stranded recovery origins, and related activity/test coverage. - Preserved related backend contract updates for routine timestamp variables and managed agent instruction bundles because they live in shared/server contracts from the source branch. - Addressed Greptile feedback by making `Company.attachmentMaxBytes` non-optional, simplifying review request-depth clamping, fixing the migration final newline, and enforcing the process-level attachment cap as the final ceiling for uploads. - Added minimal company fixtures needed for repo-wide typecheck/build and kept the PR to 66 changed files with forbidden/non-slice paths excluded. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` - `git diff --name-only origin/master..HEAD | wc -l` -> 66 files - `git diff --name-only origin/master..HEAD -- .github/workflows/pr.yml pnpm-lock.yaml package.json doc skills .agents scripts packages/adapters` -> no output - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts packages/shared/src/routine-variables.test.ts packages/shared/src/adapter-types.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company.test.ts server/src/__tests__/productivity-review-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-control-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-control-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-attachment-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts` -> 12 files, 147 tests passed - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-delete.test.ts cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts server/src/__tests__/productivity-review-service.test.ts` -> 3 files, 18 tests passed - `pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-attachment-routes.test.ts` -> 1 file, 6 tests passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter paperclipai typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` ## Risks - Includes migrations `0073_shiny_salo.sql` and `0074_striped_genesis.sql`; merge ordering matters if another PR adds migrations first. - This is intentionally backend-only apart from fixture/test updates forced by shared type correctness; UI affordances from PR #4692 are not present here and should land in separate UI slices. - The worktree install emitted plugin SDK bin-link warnings for unbuilt plugin packages, but the targeted tests and package typechecks completed successfully. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected; check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled terminal/GitHub workflow. Exact runtime context window was not exposed by the harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
87 lines
3.3 KiB
TypeScript
87 lines
3.3 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
BUILTIN_ROUTINE_VARIABLE_NAMES,
|
|
extractRoutineVariableNames,
|
|
getBuiltinRoutineVariableValues,
|
|
interpolateRoutineTemplate,
|
|
isBuiltinRoutineVariable,
|
|
syncRoutineVariablesWithTemplate,
|
|
} from "./routine-variables.js";
|
|
|
|
describe("routine variable helpers", () => {
|
|
it("extracts placeholder names in first-appearance order", () => {
|
|
expect(
|
|
extractRoutineVariableNames("Review {{repo}} and {{priority}} for {{repo}}"),
|
|
).toEqual(["repo", "priority"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("deduplicates placeholder names across the routine title and description", () => {
|
|
expect(
|
|
extractRoutineVariableNames([
|
|
"Triage {{repo}}",
|
|
"Review {{repo}} for {{priority}} bugs",
|
|
]),
|
|
).toEqual(["repo", "priority"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("preserves existing metadata when syncing variables from a template", () => {
|
|
expect(
|
|
syncRoutineVariablesWithTemplate(["Triage {{repo}}", "Review {{repo}} and {{priority}}"], [
|
|
{ name: "repo", label: "Repository", type: "text", defaultValue: "paperclip", required: true, options: [] },
|
|
]),
|
|
).toEqual([
|
|
{ name: "repo", label: "Repository", type: "text", defaultValue: "paperclip", required: true, options: [] },
|
|
{ name: "priority", label: null, type: "text", defaultValue: null, required: true, options: [] },
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("interpolates provided variable values into the routine template", () => {
|
|
expect(
|
|
interpolateRoutineTemplate("Review {{repo}} for {{priority}}", {
|
|
repo: "paperclip",
|
|
priority: "high",
|
|
}),
|
|
).toBe("Review paperclip for high");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("identifies built-in variable names", () => {
|
|
expect(isBuiltinRoutineVariable("date")).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isBuiltinRoutineVariable("timestamp")).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isBuiltinRoutineVariable("repo")).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(BUILTIN_ROUTINE_VARIABLE_NAMES.has("date")).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(BUILTIN_ROUTINE_VARIABLE_NAMES.has("timestamp")).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("getBuiltinRoutineVariableValues returns date in YYYY-MM-DD format", () => {
|
|
const values = getBuiltinRoutineVariableValues();
|
|
expect(values.date).toMatch(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/);
|
|
expect(values.date).toBe(new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("getBuiltinRoutineVariableValues returns a human-readable timestamp with year, time, and UTC", () => {
|
|
const values = getBuiltinRoutineVariableValues();
|
|
const year = String(new Date().getUTCFullYear());
|
|
expect(values.timestamp).toContain(year);
|
|
expect(values.timestamp).toMatch(/\d{1,2}:\d{2}\s?(AM|PM)/);
|
|
expect(values.timestamp).toContain("UTC");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("excludes built-in variables from syncRoutineVariablesWithTemplate", () => {
|
|
const result = syncRoutineVariablesWithTemplate(
|
|
"Daily report for {{date}} at {{timestamp}} — {{repo}}",
|
|
[],
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result).toEqual([
|
|
{ name: "repo", label: null, type: "text", defaultValue: null, required: true, options: [] },
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("interpolates built-in variables alongside user variables", () => {
|
|
const builtins = getBuiltinRoutineVariableValues();
|
|
const allVars = { ...builtins, repo: "paperclip" };
|
|
expect(
|
|
interpolateRoutineTemplate("Report for {{date}} ({{timestamp}}) on {{repo}}", allVars),
|
|
).toBe(`Report for ${builtins.date} (${builtins.timestamp}) on paperclip`);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|