Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/issue-closed-workspace-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta b7545823be [codex] Add document annotations and comments (#6733)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies through issues, documents,
runs, and durable company-scoped state.
> - Issue documents are where agents and operators capture plans,
handoffs, and work products.
> - Before this change, document collaboration could only happen through
whole-document edits and detached issue comments.
> - Inline document annotations need stable anchors, revision-aware
persistence, and UI affordances that do not break existing document
editing.
> - This pull request adds company-scoped document annotation threads,
comments, anchor snapshots, API routes, and board UI.
> - The benefit is that operators and agents can discuss specific
document passages without losing context as documents evolve.

## What Changed

- Added document annotation tables, schema exports, shared types,
validators, anchor hashing, and text-anchor helpers.
- Added server-side document annotation services and issue routes for
listing, creating, commenting, resolving, and reopening annotation
threads.
- Included annotation summaries in relevant issue document reads and
backup/recovery document workspace behavior.
- Added React UI for inline document highlights, comment panels, mobile
sheet behavior, deep-link focus, and resolved/open filtering.
- Added annotation design artifacts, Storybook coverage, screenshots,
and a screenshot helper script.
- Rebased the branch onto current `paperclipai/paperclip` `master` and
renumbered the annotation migration from `0085_old_swarm` to
`0091_old_swarm`; the SQL uses `IF NOT EXISTS` guards so environments
that previously applied the old migration number can safely apply the
new one.
- Adjusted the new annotation UI tests to use a local async flush helper
because this workspace's React 19.2.4 export does not expose
`React.act`.

## Verification

- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
packages/shared/src/document-anchors.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/document-annotation-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/document-annotations-service.test.ts
ui/src/components/DocumentAnnotationLayer.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueDocumentAnnotations.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/document-annotation-hash.test.ts
ui/src/lib/document-annotation-selection.test.ts`
- Confirmed `git diff --check` passes.
- Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*` files are
included in the PR diff.

## Risks

- Medium risk: this adds new persisted annotation tables and routes
across db/shared/server/ui.
- Migration risk is reduced by moving the branch migration to
`0091_old_swarm` after upstream `0090_resource_memberships` and keeping
the SQL idempotent for old `0085_old_swarm` adopters.
- UI risk is mostly around text range anchoring and panel positioning
across long documents, folded content, and mobile layouts; the PR
includes focused unit coverage and design screenshots.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-using software engineering
mode. Context window size is not exposed in this Paperclip runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-26 06:41:23 -07:00

258 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const issueId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
const closedWorkspaceId = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const nextWorkspaceId = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
const agentId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
checkout: vi.fn(),
addComment: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockExecutionWorkspaceService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockProjectService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
function registerServiceMocks() {
vi.doMock("../routes/authz.js", async () => vi.importActual("../routes/authz.js"));
vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
}));
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/execution-workspaces.js", () => ({
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/projects.js", () => ({
projectService: () => mockProjectService,
}));
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
companyService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
}),
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => ({
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
documentService: () => ({}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => mockExecutionWorkspaceService,
feedbackService: () => ({
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(async () => []),
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(async () => ({ vote: null, consentEnabledNow: false, sharingEnabled: false })),
}),
goalService: () => ({
getDefaultCompanyGoal: vi.fn(async () => null),
getById: vi.fn(async () => null),
}),
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}),
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueReferenceService: () => ({
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
addedReferencedIssues: [],
removedReferencedIssues: [],
currentReferencedIssues: [],
}),
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
syncComment: async () => undefined,
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
}),
issueThreadInteractionService: () => ({
listForIssue: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
}),
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => mockProjectService,
routineService: () => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}),
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
}
async function createApp() {
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
import("../routes/issues.js"),
import("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
type: "board",
userId: "local-board",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "local_implicit",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
function makeIssue() {
return {
id: issueId,
companyId: "company-1",
status: "todo",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
assigneeUserId: null,
createdByUserId: "local-board",
identifier: "PAP-1085",
title: "Closed worktree issue",
projectId: null,
executionRunId: null,
checkoutRunId: null,
executionWorkspaceId: closedWorkspaceId,
};
}
function makeClosedWorkspace() {
return {
id: closedWorkspaceId,
name: "PAP-1085-fix-worktree-guard",
mode: "isolated_workspace",
status: "archived",
closedAt: new Date("2026-04-04T17:00:00.000Z"),
};
}
describe.sequential("closed isolated workspace issue routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry");
vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/execution-workspaces.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/projects.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerServiceMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeIssue());
mockExecutionWorkspaceService.getById.mockResolvedValue(makeClosedWorkspace());
});
it("rejects new issue comments when the linked isolated workspace is closed", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/comments`)
.send({ body: "hello" });
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("closed workspace");
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects comment updates when the linked isolated workspace is closed", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`)
.send({ comment: "hello" });
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("closed workspace");
expect(mockIssueService.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockIssueService.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects checkout when the linked isolated workspace is closed", async () => {
const res = await request(await createApp())
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/checkout`)
.send({
agentId,
expectedStatuses: ["todo", "backlog", "blocked"],
});
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
expect(res.body.error).toContain("closed workspace");
expect(mockIssueService.checkout).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("still allows non-comment board updates so the issue can be moved to a new workspace", async () => {
mockIssueService.update.mockResolvedValue({
...makeIssue(),
executionWorkspaceId: nextWorkspaceId,
});
const res = await request(await createApp())
.patch(`/api/issues/${issueId}`)
.send({ executionWorkspaceId: nextWorkspaceId });
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(res.body.executionWorkspaceId).toBe(nextWorkspaceId);
});
});