forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
a1b30c9f35
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies. > - Issues are the core unit of work, and issue comments are how board users and agents coordinate execution. > - Some issue conversations need to produce plans and approvals instead of immediate implementation work. > - The existing issue contract did not distinguish standard execution comments from planning-oriented issue work. > - This pull request adds an issue work-mode contract and board UI affordances for standard vs planning mode. > - The benefit is that planning-mode issues can be created, displayed, discussed, and carried through agent heartbeat context without losing the normal issue workflow. ## What Changed - Added `standard` / `planning` issue work-mode contracts across DB, shared validators/types, server issue flows, plugin protocol, and adapter heartbeat payloads. - Added an idempotent `0081_optimal_dormammu` migration for `issues.work_mode`, ordered after current `public-gh/master` migrations. - Updated heartbeat/context summaries and issue-thread interaction behavior so planning work mode is preserved when creating suggested follow-up issues. - Added UI support for planning-mode issue creation, issue rows, detail composer styling, and composer work-mode toggles. - Added focused server/shared/UI tests plus a Playwright visual verification spec for planning-mode surfaces. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` and added durable planning-mode screenshots under `doc/assets/pap-3368/`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db run check:migrations` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/shared packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-goal-context-routes.test.ts --pool=forks --poolOptions.forks.isolate=true` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueRow.test.tsx ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` - `PAPERCLIP_E2E_SKIP_LLM=true npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/planning-mode-visual-verification.spec.ts` ## Screenshots Desktop planning detail:  Desktop planning row:  Desktop staged standard toggle:  Mobile planning detail:  Mobile planning row:  ## Risks - Medium migration risk: this adds a non-null issue column. The migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so installations that applied an older branch-local migration number can still apply the final numbered migration safely. - Medium contract risk: issue payloads, plugin payloads, and adapter heartbeat payloads now include work mode; compatibility is handled by defaulting missing values to `standard`. - UI risk is moderate because composer controls changed; focused component tests and visual e2e coverage exercise standard vs planning display and toggle behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in a local Paperclip worktree, with shell/tool use. Exact context-window size is not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
241 lines
7.2 KiB
TypeScript
241 lines
7.2 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH } from "../index.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
addIssueCommentSchema,
|
|
createIssueSchema,
|
|
respondIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
suggestedTaskDraftSchema,
|
|
updateIssueSchema,
|
|
upsertIssueDocumentSchema,
|
|
} from "./issue.js";
|
|
import { createAgentSchema } from "./agent.js";
|
|
|
|
describe("issue validators", () => {
|
|
it("passes real line breaks through unchanged", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Follow up PR",
|
|
description: "Line 1\n\nLine 2",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.description).toBe("Line 1\n\nLine 2");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts null and omitted optional multiline issue fields", () => {
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Follow up PR", description: null }).description)
|
|
.toBeNull();
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Follow up PR" }).description)
|
|
.toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(updateIssueSchema.parse({ comment: undefined }).comment)
|
|
.toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes JSON-escaped line breaks in issue descriptions", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Follow up PR",
|
|
description: "PR: https://example.com/pr/1\\n\\nShip the follow-up.",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.description).toBe("PR: https://example.com/pr/1\n\nShip the follow-up.");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in issue update comments", () => {
|
|
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
comment: "Done\\n\\n- Verified the route",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.comment).toBe("Done\n\n- Verified the route");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in issue comment bodies", () => {
|
|
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.parse({
|
|
body: "Progress update\\r\\n\\r\\nNext action.",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.body).toBe("Progress update\n\nNext action.");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts structured issue comment presentation and metadata", () => {
|
|
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.parse({
|
|
body: "Paperclip needs a disposition before this issue can continue.",
|
|
authorType: "system",
|
|
presentation: {
|
|
kind: "system_notice",
|
|
tone: "warning",
|
|
title: "Needs disposition",
|
|
},
|
|
metadata: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
sections: [
|
|
{
|
|
title: "Evidence",
|
|
rows: [
|
|
{ type: "key_value", label: "Cause", value: "successful_run_missing_state" },
|
|
{ type: "issue_link", label: "Source issue", identifier: "PAP-3440" },
|
|
{ type: "run_link", label: "Run", runId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.presentation?.detailsDefaultOpen).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(parsed.metadata?.sections[0]?.rows).toHaveLength(3);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects arbitrary issue comment metadata", () => {
|
|
const parsed = addIssueCommentSchema.safeParse({
|
|
body: "Hidden details",
|
|
metadata: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
transcript: "raw log dump",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in generated task drafts", () => {
|
|
const parsed = suggestedTaskDraftSchema.parse({
|
|
clientKey: "task-1",
|
|
title: "Follow up",
|
|
description: "Line 1\\n\\nLine 2",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.description).toBe("Line 1\n\nLine 2");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("normalizes escaped line breaks in thread summaries and documents", () => {
|
|
const response = respondIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
summaryMarkdown: "Summary\\n\\nNext action",
|
|
});
|
|
const document = upsertIssueDocumentSchema.parse({
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# Plan\\n\\nShip it",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(response.summaryMarkdown).toBe("Summary\n\nNext action");
|
|
expect(document.body).toBe("# Plan\n\nShip it");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("clamps oversized requestDepth values on create", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Clamp request depth",
|
|
requestDepth: MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH + 500,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.requestDepth).toBe(MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("defaults issue work mode to standard and accepts planning", () => {
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Plan first" }).workMode).toBe("standard");
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.parse({ title: "Plan first", workMode: "planning" }).workMode).toBe("planning");
|
|
expect(updateIssueSchema.parse({ workMode: "planning" }).workMode).toBe("planning");
|
|
expect(suggestedTaskDraftSchema.parse({
|
|
clientKey: "planning-child",
|
|
title: "Plan child",
|
|
workMode: "planning",
|
|
}).workMode).toBe("planning");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unknown issue work modes", () => {
|
|
expect(createIssueSchema.safeParse({ title: "Plan first", workMode: "normal" }).success).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(suggestedTaskDraftSchema.safeParse({
|
|
clientKey: "bad-child",
|
|
title: "Bad child",
|
|
workMode: "analysis",
|
|
}).success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("clamps oversized requestDepth values on update", () => {
|
|
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
requestDepth: MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH + 1,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.requestDepth).toBe(MAX_ISSUE_REQUEST_DEPTH);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts the cheap model profile in issue assignee adapter overrides", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueSchema.parse({
|
|
title: "Run a cheap heartbeat",
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
|
|
modelProfile: "cheap",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.assigneeAdapterOverrides?.modelProfile).toBe("cheap");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unknown issue model profile keys", () => {
|
|
const parsed = updateIssueSchema.safeParse({
|
|
assigneeAdapterOverrides: {
|
|
modelProfile: "fast",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("validates agent runtime cheap model profile config without rejecting other runtime fields", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createAgentSchema.parse({
|
|
name: "Coder",
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
runtimeConfig: {
|
|
heartbeat: { enabled: true },
|
|
modelProfiles: {
|
|
cheap: {
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
label: "Cheap Codex",
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
model: "gpt-5.3-codex-spark",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.runtimeConfig.modelProfiles?.cheap?.adapterConfig).toEqual({
|
|
model: "gpt-5.3-codex-spark",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(parsed.runtimeConfig.heartbeat).toEqual({ enabled: true });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("validates cheap model profile env bindings like top-level adapter config", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createAgentSchema.safeParse({
|
|
name: "Coder",
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
runtimeConfig: {
|
|
modelProfiles: {
|
|
cheap: {
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
env: {
|
|
API_TOKEN: 123,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unknown agent runtime model profile keys", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createAgentSchema.safeParse({
|
|
name: "Coder",
|
|
adapterType: "codex_local",
|
|
runtimeConfig: {
|
|
modelProfiles: {
|
|
fast: {
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
model: "gpt-5-mini",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|