forked from farhoodlabs/paperclip
e89d3f7e11
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a local-first control plane for AI-agent companies. > - Operators need predictable local dev behavior, recoverable instance data, and scripts that do not churn the running app. > - Several accumulated changes improve backup streaming, dev-server health, static UI caching/logging, diagnostic-file ignores, and instance isolation. > - These are operational improvements that can land independently from product UI work. > - This pull request groups the dev-infra and backup changes from the split branch into one standalone branch. > - The benefit is safer local operation, easier manual backups, less noisy dev output, and less cross-instance auth leakage. ## What Changed - Added a manual instance database backup endpoint and route tests. - Streamed backup/restore handling to avoid materializing large payloads at once. - Reduced dev static UI log/cache churn and ignored Node diagnostic report captures. - Added guarded dev auto-restart health polling coverage. - Preserved worktree config during provisioning and scoped auth cookies by instance. - Added a Discord daily digest helper script and environment documentation. - Hardened adapter-route and startup feedback export tests around the changed infrastructure. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/db/src/backup-lib.test.ts server/src/__tests__/instance-database-backups-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/dev-runner-paths.test.ts server/src/__tests__/health-dev-server-token.test.ts server/src/__tests__/http-log-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/vite-html-renderer.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts server/src/__tests__/better-auth.test.ts` - Split integration check: merged after the runtime/governance branch and before UI branches with no merge conflicts. - Confirmed this branch does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml`. ## Risks - Medium risk: touches server startup, backup streaming, auth cookie naming, dev health checks, and worktree provisioning. - Backup endpoint behavior depends on existing board/admin access controls and database backup helpers. - No database migrations are included. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.4 tool-enabled coding model, agentic code-editing/runtime with local shell and GitHub CLI access; exact context window and reasoning mode are not exposed by the Paperclip harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
150 lines
4.0 KiB
TypeScript
150 lines
4.0 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import { errorHandler } from "../middleware/index.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
instanceDatabaseBackupRoutes,
|
|
type InstanceDatabaseBackupService,
|
|
} from "../routes/instance-database-backups.js";
|
|
import { conflict } from "../errors.js";
|
|
|
|
function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>, service: InstanceDatabaseBackupService) {
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
req.actor = actor as typeof req.actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", instanceDatabaseBackupRoutes(service));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function createBackupService(overrides: Partial<InstanceDatabaseBackupService> = {}): InstanceDatabaseBackupService {
|
|
return {
|
|
runManualBackup: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
|
|
trigger: "manual",
|
|
backupFile: "/tmp/paperclip-20260416.sql.gz",
|
|
sizeBytes: 1234,
|
|
prunedCount: 2,
|
|
backupDir: "/tmp",
|
|
retention: {
|
|
dailyDays: 7,
|
|
weeklyWeeks: 4,
|
|
monthlyMonths: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
startedAt: "2026-04-16T20:00:00.000Z",
|
|
finishedAt: "2026-04-16T20:00:01.000Z",
|
|
durationMs: 1000,
|
|
}),
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("instance database backup routes", () => {
|
|
it("runs a manual backup for an instance admin and returns the server result", async () => {
|
|
const service = createBackupService();
|
|
const app = createApp(
|
|
{
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "admin-1",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: true,
|
|
},
|
|
service,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/database-backups").send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
|
|
expect(service.runManualBackup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual({
|
|
trigger: "manual",
|
|
backupFile: "/tmp/paperclip-20260416.sql.gz",
|
|
sizeBytes: 1234,
|
|
prunedCount: 2,
|
|
backupDir: "/tmp",
|
|
retention: {
|
|
dailyDays: 7,
|
|
weeklyWeeks: 4,
|
|
monthlyMonths: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
startedAt: "2026-04-16T20:00:00.000Z",
|
|
finishedAt: "2026-04-16T20:00:01.000Z",
|
|
durationMs: 1000,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows local implicit board access", async () => {
|
|
const service = createBackupService();
|
|
const app = createApp(
|
|
{
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
},
|
|
service,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
await request(app).post("/api/instance/database-backups").send({}).expect(201);
|
|
|
|
expect(service.runManualBackup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects non-admin board users", async () => {
|
|
const service = createBackupService();
|
|
const app = createApp(
|
|
{
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "user-1",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
companyIds: ["company-1"],
|
|
},
|
|
service,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
await request(app).post("/api/instance/database-backups").send({}).expect(403);
|
|
|
|
expect(service.runManualBackup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects agent callers", async () => {
|
|
const service = createBackupService();
|
|
const app = createApp(
|
|
{
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
source: "agent_key",
|
|
},
|
|
service,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
await request(app).post("/api/instance/database-backups").send({}).expect(403);
|
|
|
|
expect(service.runManualBackup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns conflict when another server backup is already running", async () => {
|
|
const service = createBackupService({
|
|
runManualBackup: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(conflict("Database backup already in progress")),
|
|
});
|
|
const app = createApp(
|
|
{
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "admin-1",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: true,
|
|
},
|
|
service,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(app).post("/api/instance/database-backups").send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(409);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual({ error: "Database backup already in progress" });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|