Files
paperclip/server/src/__tests__/issue-feedback-routes.test.ts
T
Dotta b9a80dcf22 feat: implement multi-user access and invite flows (#3784)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies.
> - V1 needs to stay local-first while also supporting shared,
authenticated deployments.
> - Human operators need real identities, company membership, invite
flows, profile surfaces, and company-scoped access controls.
> - Agents and operators also need the existing issue, inbox, workspace,
approval, and plugin flows to keep working under those authenticated
boundaries.
> - This branch accumulated the multi-user implementation, follow-up QA
fixes, workspace/runtime refinements, invite UX improvements,
release-branch conflict resolution, and review hardening.
> - This pull request consolidates that branch onto the current `master`
branch as a single reviewable PR.
> - The benefit is a complete multi-user implementation path with tests
and docs carried forward without dropping existing branch work.

## What Changed

- Added authenticated human-user access surfaces: auth/session routes,
company user directory, profile settings, company access/member
management, join requests, and invite management.
- Added invite creation, invite landing, onboarding, logo/branding,
invite grants, deduped join requests, and authenticated multi-user E2E
coverage.
- Tightened company-scoped and instance-admin authorization across
board, plugin, adapter, access, issue, and workspace routes.
- Added profile-image URL validation hardening, avatar preservation on
name-only profile updates, and join-request uniqueness migration cleanup
for pending human requests.
- Added an atomic member role/status/grants update path so Company
Access saves no longer leave partially updated permissions.
- Improved issue chat, inbox, assignee identity rendering,
sidebar/account/company navigation, workspace routing, and execution
workspace reuse behavior for multi-user operation.
- Added and updated server/UI tests covering auth, invites, membership,
issue workspace inheritance, plugin authz, inbox/chat behavior, and
multi-user flows.
- Merged current `public-gh/master` into this branch, resolved all
conflicts, and verified no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is included in this
PR diff.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx`
- `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/access-validators.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/authz-company-access.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/sidebar-preferences-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/openclaw-invite-prompt-route.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/auth-routes.test.ts
ui/src/pages/CompanyAccess.test.tsx`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server
typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`
- `pnpm db:generate`
- `npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts --list`
- Confirmed branch has no uncommitted changes and is `0` commits behind
`public-gh/master` before PR creation.
- Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is staged or present in the PR
diff.

## Risks

- High review surface area: this PR contains the accumulated multi-user
branch plus follow-up fixes, so reviewers should focus especially on
company-boundary enforcement and authenticated-vs-local deployment
behavior.
- UI behavior changed across invites, inbox, issue chat, access
settings, and sidebar navigation; no browser screenshots are included in
this branch-consolidation PR.
- Plugin install, upgrade, and lifecycle/config mutations now require
instance-admin access, which is intentional but may change expectations
for non-admin board users.
- A join-request dedupe migration rejects duplicate pending human
requests before creating unique indexes; deployments with unusual
historical duplicates should review the migration behavior.
- Company member role/status/grant saves now use a new combined
endpoint; older separate endpoints remain for compatibility.
- Full production build was not run locally in this heartbeat; CI should
cover the full matrix.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5-based model, CLI/tool-use
environment. Exact deployed model identifier and context window were not
exposed by the runtime.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Note on screenshots: this is a branch-consolidation PR for an
already-developed multi-user branch, and no browser screenshots were
captured during this heartbeat.

---------

Co-authored-by: dotta <dotta@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-17 09:44:19 -05:00

225 lines
6.8 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const mockFeedbackService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getFeedbackTraceById: vi.fn(),
getFeedbackTraceBundle: vi.fn(),
listIssueVotesForUser: vi.fn(),
listFeedbackTraces: vi.fn(),
saveIssueVote: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
update: vi.fn(),
addComment: vi.fn(),
findMentionedAgents: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockFeedbackExportService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
flushPendingFeedbackTraces: vi.fn(async () => ({ attempted: 1, sent: 1, failed: 0 })),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
canUser: vi.fn(),
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
getRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
getActiveRunForAgent: vi.fn(async () => null),
cancelRun: vi.fn(async () => null),
}));
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
})),
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => ["company-1"]),
}));
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
}));
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
function registerModuleMocks() {
vi.doMock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry", () => ({
trackAgentTaskCompleted: vi.fn(),
trackErrorHandlerCrash: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.doMock("../telemetry.js", () => ({
getTelemetryClient: vi.fn(() => ({ track: vi.fn() })),
}));
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
documentService: () => ({}),
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
feedbackService: () => mockFeedbackService,
goalService: () => ({}),
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
projectService: () => ({}),
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
workProductService: () => ({}),
}));
}
async function createApp(actor: Record<string, unknown>) {
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
import("../routes/issues.js"),
import("../middleware/index.js"),
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = actor;
next();
});
app.use("/api", issueRoutes({} as any, {} as any, { feedbackExportService: mockFeedbackExportService }));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
describe("issue feedback trace routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.resetModules();
vi.doUnmock("@paperclipai/shared/telemetry");
vi.doUnmock("../telemetry.js");
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
registerModuleMocks();
vi.clearAllMocks();
mockFeedbackExportService.flushPendingFeedbackTraces.mockResolvedValue({
attempted: 1,
sent: 1,
failed: 0,
});
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockHeartbeatService.getActiveRunForAgent.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockHeartbeatService.cancelRun.mockResolvedValue(null);
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
id: "instance-settings-1",
general: {
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
},
});
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue(["company-1"]);
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
});
it("flushes a newly shared feedback trace immediately after saving the vote", async () => {
const targetId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "issue-1",
companyId: "company-1",
identifier: "PAP-1",
});
mockFeedbackService.saveIssueVote.mockResolvedValue({
vote: {
targetType: "issue_comment",
targetId,
vote: "up",
reason: null,
},
traceId: "trace-1",
consentEnabledNow: false,
persistedSharingPreference: null,
sharingEnabled: true,
});
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: true,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app)
.post("/api/issues/issue-1/feedback-votes")
.send({
targetType: "issue_comment",
targetId,
vote: "up",
allowSharing: true,
});
expect([200, 201]).toContain(res.status);
expect(mockFeedbackExportService.flushPendingFeedbackTraces).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
companyId: "company-1",
traceId: "trace-1",
limit: 1,
});
});
it("rejects non-board callers before fetching a feedback trace", async () => {
const app = await createApp({
type: "agent",
agentId: "agent-1",
companyId: "company-1",
source: "agent_key",
runId: "run-1",
});
const res = await request(app).get("/api/feedback-traces/trace-1");
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockFeedbackService.getFeedbackTraceById).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("returns 404 when a board user lacks access to the trace company", async () => {
mockFeedbackService.getFeedbackTraceById.mockResolvedValue({
id: "trace-1",
companyId: "company-2",
});
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app).get("/api/feedback-traces/trace-1");
expect(res.status).toBe(404);
});
it("returns 404 for bundle fetches when a board user lacks access to the trace company", async () => {
mockFeedbackService.getFeedbackTraceBundle.mockResolvedValue({
id: "trace-1",
companyId: "company-2",
issueId: "issue-1",
files: [],
});
const app = await createApp({
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
companyIds: ["company-1"],
});
const res = await request(app).get("/api/feedback-traces/trace-1/bundle");
expect(res.status).toBe(404);
});
});