groombook/app
Archived
13
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(GRO-655): create corepack cache dir in builder stage #289

Merged
scrubs-mcbarkley-ceo[bot] merged 2 commits from fix/gro-655-corepack-only into main 2026-04-15 02:08:55 +00:00
Conversation 4 Commits 2 Files Changed -
scrubs-mcbarkley-ceo[bot] commented 2026-04-14 23:56:05 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

Summary

Fixes ENOENT crash in migrate-schema-c438f57 and seed-test-data-c438f57 Kubernetes jobs.

Root Cause

Corepack tries to mkdir /home/node/.cache/node/corepack/v1 at runtime, but the parent directory /home/node/.cache/node/corepack did not exist in the builder Docker stage. This is a regression in image 2026.04.14-c438f57 — a prior version of corepack did not require this directory to be pre-created.

Fix

Added RUN mkdir -p /home/node/.cache/node/corepack to the builder stage in apps/api/Dockerfile. The migrate and seed stages both inherit from builder, so they now have the directory in place before corepack attempts to populate it.

Testing

  • pnpm lint — no errors (warnings only, pre-existing)
  • pnpm typecheck — clean
  • pnpm test — 264 tests passing (17 files)

Closes GRO-655. cc @cpfarhood

## Summary Fixes ENOENT crash in `migrate-schema-c438f57` and `seed-test-data-c438f57` Kubernetes jobs. ## Root Cause Corepack tries to `mkdir /home/node/.cache/node/corepack/v1` at runtime, but the parent directory `/home/node/.cache/node/corepack` did not exist in the `builder` Docker stage. This is a regression in image `2026.04.14-c438f57` — a prior version of corepack did not require this directory to be pre-created. ## Fix Added `RUN mkdir -p /home/node/.cache/node/corepack` to the `builder` stage in `apps/api/Dockerfile`. The `migrate` and `seed` stages both inherit from `builder`, so they now have the directory in place before corepack attempts to populate it. ## Testing - `pnpm lint` — no errors (warnings only, pre-existing) - `pnpm typecheck` — clean - `pnpm test` — 264 tests passing (17 files) Closes GRO-655. cc @cpfarhood
lint-roller-qa[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2026-04-14 23:57:29 +00:00
github-actions[bot] commented 2026-04-15 00:02:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

Deployed to groombook-dev

Images: pr-289
URL: https://dev.groombook.farh.net

Ready for UAT validation.

## Deployed to groombook-dev **Images:** `pr-289` **URL:** https://dev.groombook.farh.net Ready for UAT validation.
the-dogfather-cto[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2026-04-15 02:01:25 +00:00
the-dogfather-cto[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

CTO Review: Approved

Clean one-line fix for corepack ENOENT regression. Properly placed in builder stage — all dependent stages (migrate, seed, reset) inherit the directory. Minimal risk, no regressions. Good to merge.

**CTO Review: Approved** Clean one-line fix for corepack ENOENT regression. Properly placed in builder stage — all dependent stages (migrate, seed, reset) inherit the directory. Minimal risk, no regressions. Good to merge.
github-actions[bot] commented 2026-04-15 02:08:01 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

Deployed to groombook-dev

Images: pr-289
URL: https://dev.groombook.farh.net

Ready for UAT validation.

## Deployed to groombook-dev **Images:** `pr-289` **URL:** https://dev.groombook.farh.net Ready for UAT validation.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something isn't working
 documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
 duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
 enhancement
New feature or request
 feature
New feature
 good first issue
Good for newcomers
 help wanted
Extra attention is needed
 invalid
This doesn't seem right
 question
Further information is requested
 wontfix
This will not be worked on
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
ai-review (AI Review) gb_barkley (Barkley Trimsworth) cpfarhood (Chris Farhood) ci (Continuous Integration [bot]) gb_flea (Flea Flicker) flux (Flux CD) admin (Gitea Admin) gb_lint (Lint Roller) renovate (Mend Renovate) gb_pawla (Pawla Abdul) gb_scrubs (Scrubs McBarkley) gb_shedward (Shedward Scissorhands) gb_dogfather (The Dogfather)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: groombook/app#289
Delete Branch "fix/gro-655-corepack-only"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?