--- name: sdlc description: > Software development lifecycle for GroomBook. Covers Gitea authentication, branch strategy across Dev/UAT/Prod, the SDLC pipeline phases, PR review and merge policy, infrastructure layout, the Gitea-origin issue board-approval gate, and the canonical tools list. --- # Software Development Lifecycle ## Gitea authentication **Use the `tea` CLI** with the `GITEA_TOKEN` environment variable for all Gitea operations. Configure it once: ```bash tea login add --url https://git.farh.net --token $GITEA_TOKEN --name groombook ``` Gitea is the **primary source of truth**. Every Paperclip issue should have a corresponding Gitea issue (create one if missing). Both stay open until the work is completed, reviewed, approved, merged, and QA-verified. ## Gitea-origin issue policy — board approval required If a task originated from Gitea (`originKind: "gitea"`), **do not begin work**. Immediately create a board approval: ``` POST /api/companies/{companyId}/approvals { "type": "request_board_approval", "requestedByAgentId": "{your-agent-id}", "issueIds": ["{issueId}"], "payload": { "title": "Board approval required: Gitea issue", "summary": "Summarize what the Gitea issue requests.", "recommendedAction": "Approve to begin work.", "risks": ["Work begins without board review if approved."] } } ``` Set the issue to `blocked` with a comment linking to the approval. Only proceed once `PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_ID` is set and `PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_STATUS` indicates approval. ## Branch strategy Three long-lived branches map to the three deployment environments: | Branch | Environment | Who merges | |--------|-------------|-----------| | `dev` | Dev | Engineer (self-merges after CI passes) | | `uat` | UAT | QA (merges after code review) | | `main` | Production | UAT (validates browser, then merges) | **Engineers always target `dev`** — never `uat` or `main` directly. Feature branches: `/`. ## Pull requests All changes happen via pull request. Always include `cc @cpfarhood` at the bottom of the PR body for visibility — never as a reviewer. ```bash tea pr create --base dev --title "..." --body "... cc @cpfarhood" ``` ## PR review & merge policy ### Dev branch (`dev`) - **Engineer** self-merges after CI passes. No review required. Dev is for validation, not quality gates. - **QA (Lint Roller `525c2c39-1196-4682-9cd1-0bcfcb0d0f31`)** reviews the PR. Fail → back to engineer directly with exact details. ### UAT branch (`uat`) - **QA (Lint Roller)** merges `dev → uat` after approval. - **CI** builds and deploys automatically to UAT (`https://uat.groombook.dev`). ### Main branch (`main`) - **UAT (Shedward Scissorhands `c24bab42-4a3c-4a80-b4df-425eeb77088f`)** validates the deployed application via Playwright browser testing. - **UAT** merges `uat → main` after validation passes. - **CI** deploys automatically to Production (`https://demo.groombook.dev`). `@cpfarhood` is cc'd for visibility on all PRs — never as a reviewer. ## SDLC pipeline ### Phase 1 — Dev 1. **Engineer** (Flea Flicker `ccfa5281-2076-40c2-87a9-bf2dbcf98d22`) branches from `dev`, writes code. GitOps deploys to dev on demand. 2. **Engineer** opens a PR against `dev`. CI must pass. 3. **Engineer** self-merges after CI passes. 4. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to Dev (`https://dev.groombook.dev`). 5. **QA (Lint Roller `525c2c39-1196-4682-9cd1-0bcfcb0d0f31`)** reviews the PR. Fail → back to engineer. 6. QA approves and hands off to CTO. 7. **CTO (The Dogfather `c370d244-3c3b-4f21-a403-4cdc9dbdbf96`)** reviews the PR. Fail → back to engineer. 8. **CTO** merges the dev PR. ### Phase 2 — UAT promotion 9. **QA (Lint Roller)** merges `dev → uat` after CTO approval. 10. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to UAT (`https://uat.groombook.dev`). 11. **CTO** creates a UAT regression task for **Shedward Scissorhands (`c24bab42-4a3c-4a80-b4df-425eeb77088f`)** immediately after promoting. ### Phase 3 — UAT testing 12. **UAT (Shedward Scissorhands `c24bab42-4a3c-4a80-b4df-425eeb77088f`)** runs full regression against UAT — every feature, no exceptions. 13. UAT fail → CTO redistributes to engineer (return to Phase 1). 14. UAT pass → **Security Engineer (Barkley Trimsworth `622a69bf-ec37-4a5c-b385-bef7219191b1`)** performs a security code review of the changes. 15. Security fail → CTO redistributes to engineer (return to Phase 1). ### Phase 4 — Production 16. Security pass → **UAT (Shedward Scissorhands)** merges `uat → main`. 17. **CI** deploys automatically to Production (`https://demo.groombook.dev`). ### Hierarchy rules * CTO rejections at Dev go directly to the engineer (not back through QA). * UAT failures (Shedward Scissorhands `c24bab42-4a3c-4a80-b4df-425eeb77088f`) go to CTO — CTO cascades to engineer. * Security failures (Barkley Trimsworth `622a69bf-ec37-4a5c-b385-bef7219191b1`) go to CTO — CTO cascades to engineer. * UAT rejections at Prod go to CTO. > **Penetration testing.** Barkley performs scheduled penetration testing against Production (`demo.groombook.dev`) and Demo independently of the PR workflow. Board-authorized; not triggered per-PR. Findings get filed as Paperclip issues with severity (`CRITICAL` / `HIGH` / `MEDIUM` / `LOW`) and routed to CTO for engineer redistribution. ## Infrastructure * **Production / Demo:** namespace `groombook`, FQDN `demo.groombook.dev` * **UAT:** namespace `groombook-uat`, FQDN `uat.groombook.dev` * **Dev:** namespace `groombook-dev`, FQDN `dev.groombook.dev` * **Cluster:** Kubernetes — cluster-wide read; read/write on `groombook-dev` and `groombook-uat`; read-only on `groombook` (production). * **Gateways:** `istio-external` (publicly accessible) and `istio-internal` (internal only) in `gateway-system`. * **Container registry:** `ghcr.io/groombook/` only. ## Authentication * **Framework:** Better-Auth. * **Social login:** Google and Apple OAuth. * **SSO:** Authentik OIDC at `https://auth.farh.net` (credentials in `authentik-credentials` secret). * **Never build custom authentication.** ## Deployment — 2-stage Flux GitOps **Stage 1 — CI (Gitea Actions, uses GitHub Actions-compatible YAML syntax, runs in each application repo):** - Triggered automatically on every merge to `main` - Builds and tags the Docker image - Pushes tagged images to `ghcr.io/groombook/` **Stage 2 — GitOps (Flux, managed externally):** - Flux watches `groombook/infra` as the **target** GitRepository — it is **not** a Flux bootstrap/cluster repo. - Reconciles Kustomize overlays: `apps/overlays/dev` → `groombook-dev`, `apps/overlays/uat` → `groombook-uat`, `apps/overlays/prod` → `groombook`. **Policy — Flux Image Tag Automation is DENIED.** Do NOT use `ImageRepository`, `ImagePolicy`, or `ImageUpdateAutomation` Flux resources. Image tag updates must be made intentionally via a PR to `groombook/infra`. **To deploy a change:** 1. Merge code to `main` in the app repo — CI builds and pushes a new image automatically. 2. Open a PR against `groombook/infra` to update the relevant overlay; merge after kustomize CI passes. 3. Flux reconciles `groombook/infra` on merge and rolls out the updated pods. **To force a rollout** (pick up new `:latest` on stuck pods): ```bash kubectl rollout restart deployment/ -n ``` ## Infrastructure as Code Terraform / OpenTofu is deployed via the **Flux OpenTofu Controller** in a GitOps fashion. Submit configurations via a PR to `groombook/infra` — the tofu controller reconciles them on merge. **Never run `tofu` directly.** Never `kubectl apply` against production. Production changes go through Flux only. ## Tools (canonical, not alternatives) These are the only acceptable choices — alternatives are policy violations: * **Secret management:** Bitnami Sealed Secrets Controller — no plain Kubernetes secrets. * **Database:** CloudNativePG Operator (Postgres) — no SQLite, MariaDB, or MySQL. * **Cache / pub-sub:** DragonflyDB Operator — no Redis. * **Authentication:** Better-Auth + Google + Apple + Authentik (see Authentication section). Never build custom auth. * **Dependency updates:** Mend Renovate. **Dependabot is not used and will not be used.** * **Container registry:** `ghcr.io/groombook/` — no Docker Hub for first-party images. If a task requires deviating from any of the above, treat it as a destructive action: stop, file an issue with rationale, request board approval. ## External communication When communicating in any context visible outside the GroomBook agent team (external users, human reviewers, non-agent entities), include `cc @cpfarhood` for visibility — never as a reviewer.