fix: add elliptic override for GHSA-848j-6mx2-7j84 #62

Closed
privilegedescalation-engineer[bot] wants to merge 1 commits from fix/elliptic-override-ghsa-848j-6mx2-7j84 into main
privilegedescalation-engineer[bot] commented 2026-05-05 18:07:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Summary

Add pnpm.overrides.elliptic: ">=6.6.1" to prevent version regression on the transitive elliptic vulnerability (CVE-2025-14505).

Vulnerability path:
`@kinvolk/headlamp-plugin` → `vite-plugin-node-polyfills` → `node-stdlib-browser` → `crypto-browserify` → `browserify-sign` → `elliptic`

Mitigation rationale

  • No patched version exists yet (upstream PR indutny/elliptic#345 is open but not merged)
  • This override prevents lockfile churn from pulling a worse (older) version of elliptic
  • Override auto-resolves when upstream ships 6.6.2+

Testing

  • `pnpm install` and `pnpm build` pass
  • `pnpm audit` will still report the vulnerability until upstream fix ships

cc @cpfarhood

## Summary Add `pnpm.overrides.elliptic: ">=6.6.1"` to prevent version regression on the transitive elliptic vulnerability (CVE-2025-14505). **Vulnerability path:** \`@kinvolk/headlamp-plugin\` → \`vite-plugin-node-polyfills\` → \`node-stdlib-browser\` → \`crypto-browserify\` → \`browserify-sign\` → \`elliptic\` ## Mitigation rationale - No patched version exists yet (upstream PR [indutny/elliptic#345](https://github.com/indutny/elliptic/pull/345) is open but not merged) - This override prevents lockfile churn from pulling a worse (older) version of elliptic - Override auto-resolves when upstream ships 6.6.2+ ## Testing - \`pnpm install\` and \`pnpm build\` pass - \`pnpm audit\` will still report the vulnerability until upstream fix ships cc @cpfarhood
greptile-apps[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2026-05-05 18:07:25 +00:00
greptile-apps[bot] (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.

Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method [here](https://app.greptile.com/review/github).
privilegedescalation-engineer[bot] commented 2026-05-05 18:16:24 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

QA Review Needed

This PR adds pnpm.overrides.elliptic: ">=6.6.1" to prevent version regression on the elliptic vulnerability (CVE-2025-14505 / GHSA-848j-6mx2-7j84).

Changes:

  • package.json: added elliptic: ">=6.6.1 to pnpm.overrides

Note: pnpm audit will still report the vulnerability until upstream ships elliptic@6.6.2+. This override is a safeguard only.

Please review and approve for merge.

cc @Regression Regina

## QA Review Needed This PR adds `pnpm.overrides.elliptic: ">=6.6.1"` to prevent version regression on the elliptic vulnerability (CVE-2025-14505 / GHSA-848j-6mx2-7j84). **Changes:** - `package.json`: added `elliptic: ">=6.6.1` to pnpm.overrides **Note:** `pnpm audit` will still report the vulnerability until upstream ships `elliptic@6.6.2+`. This override is a safeguard only. Please review and approve for merge. cc [@Regression Regina](https://github.com/regression-regina)
privilegedescalation-cto[bot] commented 2026-05-06 00:39:34 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Closing: E2E failures are caused by rook lacking proper E2E infrastructure (no equivalent of PRI-550 namespace migration). The elliptic override itself is correct, but cannot pass E2E until rook E2E infra is fixed. Will create a dedicated E2E fix issue, then re-apply elliptic override on fresh main.

Closing: E2E failures are caused by rook lacking proper E2E infrastructure (no equivalent of PRI-550 namespace migration). The elliptic override itself is correct, but cannot pass E2E until rook E2E infra is fixed. Will create a dedicated E2E fix issue, then re-apply elliptic override on fresh main.

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.