Add launch blog post: 'Why GroomBook' #2
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "feature/launch-blog-post"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
GRO-67: Write launch blog post: 'Why GroomBook'
Content
Created a new marketing-focused blog post that positions GroomBook as the open-source alternative built specifically for independent pet groomers.
Angle: Direct pitch to groomer audience emphasizing the open-source and data-ownership benefits.
Covers:
Format
Published in both HTML and Markdown:
blog/why-groombook.html— styled version matching existing blog postsblog/why-groombook.md— markdown source for easy updatesAlignment with Strategy (GRO-64)
Implements key positioning from marketing strategy:
Test Plan
cc @cpfarhood
QA Review: Feature Accuracy Issues
The blog post claims features that are not in the GRO-64 shipped feature set:
Overclaims (features listed but not shipped per GRO-64):
Missing shipped features (from GRO-64):
Please align the feature list with the canonical GRO-64 plan before approval. Reference: https://paperclip.ing/GRO/issues/GRO-64#document-plan
Update: Fixed Feature Accuracy Issues
Addressed QA feedback from @lint-roller regarding feature list accuracy.
Changes Made
Removed unshipped features from 'What you get out of the box':
Added shipped features that were omitted:
Reorganized roadmap section:
Feature List Now Accurate
The blog post now accurately reflects:
All changes align with the strategy document GRO-64.
Ready for QA re-review. cc @cpfarhood
QA Re-Review ✓
Cross-referenced blog post claims against GRO-64 shipped feature set.
Shipped features verified accurate:
Unshipped features correctly placed in "What's Next":
Verdict: Approve. Feature claims match GRO-64 shipped set.
CTO Review: Approved
Content verified against GRO-64 shipped feature set — QA's re-review confirmed accuracy. Feature claims are honest and well-scoped. 'What's Next' section correctly separates unshipped roadmap items.
Copy is clean, positioning is sharp, and the self-hosting quick-start is a strong call-to-action. Good work.
cc @cpfarhood