27 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
The Dogfather 6e0e29f374 feat(safety): add board approval scope section 2026-05-28 12:17:23 +00:00
The Dogfather f69319e270 Revert "feat(safety): add board approval scope section" (direct push - will redo via PR) 2026-05-28 12:14:29 +00:00
The Dogfather deb507714b feat(safety): add board approval scope section 2026-05-28 12:13:27 +00:00
Chris Farhood 4df9637518 Merge pull request 'Split devops and sdlc skills by scope; dedupe shared content' (#9) from claude/devops-sdlc-split into main
Reviewed-on: groombook/org#9
2026-05-28 01:18:55 +00:00
Chris Farhood 11fd2a4c34 Collapse sdlc Phase 5 to a redirect into the devops pipeline
Phase 5 is an infra PR against groombook/infra, which means it is governed
by the devops pipeline. Spelling out a separate (QA-only) review flow here
both duplicates devops and contradicted its QA+CTO requirement. Replaced
the step list with a one-paragraph hand-off.

Resolves the policy ambiguity flagged in the PR description.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-27 21:16:10 -04:00
Chris Farhood d6b13fa58d Split devops and sdlc skills by scope; dedupe shared content
devops/SKILL.md is now the canonical home for infrastructure lifecycle
(groombook/infra, single-branch main, Flux + OpenTofu controller, cluster
topology). sdlc/SKILL.md is scoped to application code (3-branch dev/uat/main,
Phases 1-5, Stage 1 CI image build, app-tool policy). Each skill cross-refs
the other and defers to coding-standards/safety for cross-cutting rules
rather than restating them.

Fixes in devops/SKILL.md:
- Rewrote frontmatter description (was a copy of sdlc, referenced phases
  and dev/uat/prod that do not apply).
- Hoisted "applies to groombook/infra" to a top-level scope statement.
- Renumbered the pipeline (was 1,2,3,4,4,5,4,5,5) and fixed --base dev
  -> --base main in the tea example.
- Closed an unterminated bold marker.
- Removed Authentication framework, Stage 1 image build, and the
  "never tofu / never kubectl apply" lines (now cited from sdlc / safety).
- Trimmed the tools list to infra-only operators and controllers.

Trims in sdlc/SKILL.md:
- Removed Infrastructure topology, IaC, Stage 2 GitOps detail, the Flux
  Image Automation DENIED policy, the "never tofu / never kubectl apply"
  lines, and the External communication section (cited from devops /
  safety / coding-standards instead).
- Trimmed the tools list to application-level dependency choices.
- Added a pointer from Phase 5 into the devops pipeline.

cc @cpfarhood

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-27 15:31:54 -04:00
Chris Farhood c756b16c7c more updates 2026-05-26 23:27:03 -04:00
Chris Farhood 743e913126 Update skills/sdlc/SKILL.md 2026-05-27 03:05:30 +00:00
Chris Farhood a0ae03e959 Update skills/sdlc/SKILL.md 2026-05-27 03:04:25 +00:00
Chris Farhood 643d9e8956 Update skills/sdlc/SKILL.md 2026-05-27 03:04:09 +00:00
Chris Farhood 93927ea402 Merge pull request 'udpate sdlc' (#8) from sdlc-updates into main
Reviewed-on: groombook/org#8
2026-05-27 03:03:37 +00:00
Chris Farhood a51b28a315 minor tweaks 2026-05-26 23:03:17 -04:00
Chris Farhood 198ed88350 udpate sdlc 2026-05-26 23:01:12 -04:00
Chris Farhood 2ae9c4c2d4 Merge pull request 'chore(sdlc): align SDLC skill with cartsnitch/org structure' (#7) from loose-sdlc-to-match-privesc into main
Reviewed-on: groombook/org#7
2026-05-26 15:32:24 +00:00
Chris Farhood c8d8cf562c chore: switch container registry references from ghcr.io to git.farh.net
GroomBook images live on the Gitea registry, not GitHub. Update SDLC,
coding-standards, and CLAUDE.md to match.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-26 09:45:20 -04:00
Chris Farhood 693f719332 Merge origin/main, discarding Scrubs's SDLC fix commit
Keep this branch's SDLC content (cartsnitch-aligned structure). Drop
adff13f's changes — registry should remain ghcr.io, engineer self-merges
to dev, and tool-deviation policy stays at board approval.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-26 09:43:25 -04:00
Chris Farhood bf5ecdc4dc chore(sdlc): align SDLC skill with cartsnitch/org structure
- CTO merges dev→uat (was QA); CEO Scrubs McBarkley merges uat→main (was Shedward)
- Simplify Gitea auth — GITEA_TOKEN is pre-set, drop tea login add
- Restore delegation model tier section
- Add Playwright MCP to canonical tools, CalVer tag detail, imagePullPolicy note
- Trim redundant UUIDs and the verbose pen-testing footnote

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-26 09:20:06 -04:00
Scrubs McBarkley adff13f0d1 fix: correct SDLC skill — merge policy, container registry, board approval
Fixes multiple systemic issues causing excessive board approval requests:
- Fix merge policy: CTO merges dev+uat, CEO merges main (not engineer/QA/UAT)
- Fix container registry: ghcr.io → git.farh.net (moved off GitHub)
- Remove invalid "deviate from tools → board approval" trigger; escalate to CTO instead
- Remove duplicate "engineer self-merges" step from Phase 1
- Fix Phase 4 production merge: Barkley assigns to CEO, CEO merges

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-26 11:08:25 +00:00
Chris Farhood a5e8027293 Merge pull request 'Add agent avatar images for GroomBook team' (#6) from loose-sdlc-to-match-privesc into main
Reviewed-on: groombook/org#6
2026-05-25 21:21:31 +00:00
Chris Farhood 2d9e7cf8d1 Add agent avatar images for GroomBook team
Generated cartoon avatars for all 7 GroomBook agents:
- Scrubs McBarkley (CEO)
- Pawla Abdul (CMO)
- The Dogfather (CTO)
- Barkley Trimsworth (Security)
- Flea Flicker (Engineer)
- Lint Roller (QA)
- Shedward Scissorhands (UAT)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 17:19:37 -04:00
Chris Farhood 712133590c Merge pull request 'chore: loosen SDLC to match Privileged Escalation pattern' (#5) from loose-sdlc-to-match-privesc into main
Reviewed-on: groombook/org#5
2026-05-24 19:35:25 +00:00
Chris Farhood 60b9b41d4b chore: loosen SDLC to match Privileged Escalation pattern
- Engineer self-merges to dev after CI passes
- QA merges dev→uat (not CTO)
- UAT merges uat→main (not CEO)
- Remove Phase 0 product intake, delegation model, handoff protocol
- Remove explicit no-self-merge rule (covered by pipeline gates)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 15:33:56 -04:00
Chris Farhood 403311044b Add .mcp.json 2026-05-24 18:15:50 +00:00
Chris Farhood 9f9fb356f4 Add CLAUDE.md and add agent UUIDs to SDLC skill
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-23 15:30:15 -04:00
The Dogfather 9cd8f1589f Merge pull request 'chore: migrate SDLC skill from GitHub to Gitea' (#4) from scrubs/gitea-migration-skills into main
chore: migrate SDLC skill from GitHub to Gitea (#4)

Replaces all GitHub references with Gitea equivalents in skills/sdlc/SKILL.md:
- Auth: github-app-token → tea CLI + GITEA_TOKEN
- Origin: github → gitea
- PR command: gh → tea
- CI: GitHub Actions → Gitea Actions
2026-05-19 23:17:33 +00:00
Flea Flicker 4ad08fb09c Migrate SDLC skill from GitHub to Gitea 2026-05-19 23:12:24 +00:00
Scrubs McBarkley 2cd0f295f8 chore: migrate SDLC skill from GitHub to Gitea
- Replace GitHub auth section with GITEA_TOKEN + tea CLI instructions
- Remove github-app-token skill invocation
- GitHub-origin → Gitea-origin issue policy (originKind: gitea)
- gh pr create → tea pr create
- Phase 0: GitHub Issues → Gitea Issues
- CI: GitHub Actions → Gitea Actions

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-05-19 22:59:59 +00:00
13 changed files with 195 additions and 177 deletions
+11
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
{
"mcpServers": {
"gitea": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://git-mcp.farh.net/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer ${GITEA_TOKEN}"
}
}
}
}
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# CLAUDE.md
This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
## Repository Purpose
This is the GroomBook **agent skills repository** — it contains skill definitions that govern how AI agents operate within the GroomBook organization. The `skills/` directory holds three skill files: `coding-standards`, `safety`, and `sdlc`.
## Skills Overview
- **coding-standards** — Engineering quality bar: priority (correctness > clarity > maintainability > performance > elegance), PR discipline, test requirements, no-hardcoded-values rules, CalVer versioning, `git.farh.net` container registry policy.
- **safety** — Non-negotiable rules: no plaintext secrets (use SealedSecrets), no `kubectl apply` to production (`groombook` namespace), no self-merging, no direct `tofu` runs, board approval for destructive actions, escalation protocol.
- **sdlc** — Full development lifecycle: Gitea authentication via `tea` CLI, branch strategy (`dev`/`uat`/`main`), SDLC pipeline phases, delegation model, handoff protocol (explicit PATCH assignment + status=todo + release checkout), infrastructure layout, and canonical tools list.
## Critical Operational Rules
- All changes go through PRs targeting `dev`. Never push directly to `dev`, `uat`, or `main`.
- No agent merges their own PR.
- Always include `cc @cpfarhood` at the bottom of PR bodies.
- Gitea-origin issues require board approval before work begins.
- Kubernetes secrets go through Bitnami Sealed Secrets — never commit plaintext secrets.
- Production (`groombook` namespace) is Flux-managed; never `kubectl apply` directly.
- Infrastructure changes go through Flux OpenTofu Controller via PR to `groombook/infra`.
## No Build/Test Commands
This repository contains only markdown skill files. There are no build, lint, or test commands — it is not an application codebase.
Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 244 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 213 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 286 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 181 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 228 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 172 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 263 KiB

+1 -1
View File
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ All releases use CalVer (`YYYY.MMDD.PATCH`, e.g. `2026.0504.0`). No SemVer, no c
## Container images
Push to `ghcr.io` only. Never Docker Hub for first-party images.
Push to `git.farh.net` only. Never Docker Hub for first-party images.
## When uncertain
+76
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
---
name: devops
description: >
Infrastructure lifecycle for GroomBook. Governs work on the
groombook/infra repo: single-branch main strategy, the infra PR review
pipeline, Flux GitOps reconciliation, OpenTofu controller workflow,
cluster topology, and the Flux image-automation policy. For application
code, see the sdlc skill.
---
# DevOps Practices
This skill governs work on **`groombook/infra`**. For application code lifecycle, see the `sdlc` skill. For PR/test discipline and the `cc @cpfarhood` visibility rule, see `coding-standards`. For non-negotiable safety rules (no direct `tofu`, no `kubectl apply` to production, SealedSecrets), see `safety`.
## Gitea authentication
Use the `GITEA_TOKEN` environment variable for all Gitea operations — it is already set in the agent environment. Use the **`tea`** CLI for all Gitea/Git operations (e.g., `tea issue list`, `tea pr create`). Gitea is the primary source of truth.
## Branch strategy
`groombook/infra` uses a single long-lived branch: **`main`**. Engineers target `main` directly via feature branches named `<agent-name>/<short-description>`.
## Pipeline
1. **Engineer** branches from `main`, writes code.
2. **Engineer** opens a PR against `main`.
3. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer**.
4. **CI** pass → **QA** performs code review.
5. **QA** rejected → back to **Engineer**.
6. **QA** approved → **CTO** performs code review.
7. **CTO** rejected → back to **Engineer**.
8. **CTO** approved → **Engineer** merges PR → **Flux** reconciles automatically.
```bash
tea pr create --base main --title "..." --body "... cc @cpfarhood"
```
Gitea branch protection requires CI checks to pass. See `coding-standards` for the no-self-merge contract and the `cc @cpfarhood` rule.
## Infrastructure topology
* **Production:** namespace `groombook`, FQDN `demo.groombook.dev`
* **UAT:** namespace `groombook-uat`, FQDN `uat.groombook.dev`
* **Dev:** namespace `groombook-dev`, FQDN `dev.groombook.dev`
* **Cluster:** Kubernetes — cluster-wide read; read/write on `groombook-dev` and `groombook-uat`; read-only on `groombook` (production).
* **Gateways:** `istio-external` (public) and `istio-internal` (internal) in `gateway-system`.
* **Container registry:** `git.farh.net/groombook/<service>` only.
## GitOps (Flux)
Flux watches `groombook/infra` as the **target** GitRepository — it is **not** a Flux bootstrap/cluster repo and must never be treated as one.
Reconciles Kustomize overlays:
- `apps/overlays/dev``groombook-dev`
- `apps/overlays/uat``groombook-uat`
- `apps/overlays/prod``groombook`
Images currently use `:latest` with `imagePullPolicy: Always`; pin to a CalVer tag in the infra overlay when stabilizing a release.
**Policy — Flux Image Tag Automation is DENIED.** Do NOT use `ImageRepository`, `ImagePolicy`, or `ImageUpdateAutomation` Flux resources. Image tag updates must be made intentionally via a PR to `groombook/infra` — typically as the final step of the `sdlc` application pipeline (Phase 5).
## Infrastructure as Code
Terraform (OpenTofu) is deployed via the **Flux OpenTofu Controller** in a GitOps fashion. Submit Terraform configurations via a PR to `groombook/infra` — the tofu controller reconciles them on merge. See `safety` for the prohibition on running `tofu` directly and on `kubectl apply` against production.
## Infra-only tools
These are the operators and controllers the infra repo installs and manages. Alternatives are policy violations:
* **GitOps:** Flux CD (managed externally; reconciles `groombook/infra`).
* **IaC:** Flux OpenTofu Controller.
* **Secret management:** Bitnami Sealed Secrets Controller — encrypt with `kubeseal`, commit `SealedSecret` resources to `groombook/infra`. No plain Kubernetes secrets.
* **Database operator:** CloudNativePG (Postgres).
* **Cache / pub-sub operator:** DragonflyDB.
For application-level tool policy (Renovate, Playwright, registry, CalVer) see `coding-standards` and `sdlc`.
+20
View File
@@ -29,3 +29,23 @@ The following rules apply to every GroomBook agent without exception.
## If you are unsure
If you are unsure whether an action is safe, **stop**. Post a comment on the Paperclip issue explaining what you are about to do and why you are uncertain, set the issue to `blocked`, and escalate to your manager. Do not guess.
## Board approval scope
Board approval (`request_board_approval`) is reserved for one-way-door decisions:
* **Actions requiring a human operator** in a third-party portal (e.g. Gitea Owners team config, external vendor consoles).
* **Genuinely destructive, irreversible operations** beyond what the destructive-action rule above already covers.
* **Out-of-scope decisions** that exceed the agent's mandate.
* **New spend or resource authorizations.**
* **Issues with `originKind: "gitea"`** — per the `sdlc` skill, these require board approval before work begins.
Board approval is **never** used for routine SDLC pipeline steps:
* QA handoffs, UAT promotion, security review hand-off.
* Returning a failing PR to the engineer or CTO.
* Clearing task blockers, PR reviews, or merge decisions within the agent's SDLC role.
* Feature triage decisions (Accepted / Backlogged / Denied).
* Any standard dev → uat → prod progression.
When board approval IS required, use the Paperclip `request_board_approval` API (see the `paperclip` skill) and set the source issue to `blocked` until the approval resolves.
+60 -176
View File
@@ -1,225 +1,109 @@
---
name: sdlc
description: >
Software development lifecycle for GroomBook. Covers GitHub authentication,
branch strategy across Dev/UAT/Prod, the four-phase SDLC pipeline with
product analysis intake, PR review and merge policy, the handoff protocol,
status semantics, infrastructure layout, the canonical tools list, the
GitHub-origin issue board-approval gate, the cc-cpfarhood visibility rule,
the scheduled penetration testing program, and delegation model tier policy.
Software development lifecycle for GroomBook application repos. Covers
Gitea authentication, the 3-branch dev/uat/main strategy, the SDLC
pipeline phases 1-5, the Stage 1 CI image build, the authentication
framework, and application-tool policy. For infrastructure
(groombook/infra), see the devops skill.
---
# Software Development Lifecycle
## GitHub authentication
This skill governs **application code repos**. For infrastructure (`groombook/infra`), see the `devops` skill. For PR/test discipline and the `cc @cpfarhood` visibility rule, see `coding-standards`. For non-negotiable safety rules, see `safety`.
**Invoke the `github-app-token` skill** before any GitHub operation. It generates a short-lived installation token and sets `GH_TOKEN`. **Never** run `gh auth login` — it hangs headless agents. Token expires after ~1 hour; re-invoke to regenerate.
## Gitea authentication
GitHub is the **primary source of truth**. Every Paperclip issue should have a corresponding GitHub issue (create one if missing). Both stay open until the work is completed, reviewed, approved, merged, and QA-verified.
**Use the `GITEA_TOKEN`** environment variable for all Gitea operations. It is already set in the agent environment. Use the **`tea`** CLI for all Gitea/Git operations (e.g., `tea issue list`, `tea pr create`). The token expires when the environment variable is rotated re-invoke any Gitea operation if you get a 401.
## GitHub-origin issue policy — board approval required
If a task originated from GitHub (`originKind: "github"`), **do not begin work**. Immediately create a board approval:
```
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/approvals
{
"type": "request_board_approval",
"requestedByAgentId": "{your-agent-id}",
"issueIds": ["{issueId}"],
"payload": {
"title": "Board approval required: GitHub issue",
"summary": "Summarize what the GitHub issue requests.",
"recommendedAction": "Approve to begin work.",
"risks": ["Work begins without board review if approved."]
}
}
```
Set the issue to `blocked` with a comment linking to the approval. Only proceed once `PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_ID` is set and `PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_STATUS` indicates approval.
Gitea is the **primary source of truth**. Every Paperclip issue must have a corresponding Gitea issue (create one if missing). Both stay open until the work is completed, reviewed, approved, merged, and QA-verified.
## Branch strategy
Three long-lived branches map to the three deployment environments:
| Branch | Environment | Who merges |
|--------|-------------|-----------|
| `dev` | Dev | CTO (after QA approval) |
| `uat` | UAT | CTO (promotes `dev``uat`) |
| `main` | Production | CEO (promotes `uat``main`) |
| Branch | Environment | Who merges | Prerequisites for merge |
|--------|-------------|-----------|-----------|
| `dev` | Dev | Engineer | CI passes |
| `uat` | UAT | Engineer | QA code review approval |
| `main` | Production | Engineer | UAT validation & CTO code review |
**Engineers always target `dev`** — never `uat` or `main` directly. Feature branches: `<agent-name>/<short-description>`.
**Engineers always target `dev` first** — never `uat` or `main` directly.
- Feature branches: `<agent-name>/<short-description>`.
## Pull requests
All changes happen via pull request. Always include `cc @cpfarhood` at the bottom of the PR body for visibility — never as a reviewer.
All changes happen via pull request. Gitea branch protection requires CI checks to pass. See `coding-standards` for the no-self-merge contract and the `cc @cpfarhood` visibility rule.
```bash
gh pr create --base dev --title "..." --body "... cc @cpfarhood"
tea pr create --base dev --title "..." --body "... cc @cpfarhood"
```
## PR review & merge policy
### Dev branch (`dev`)
- **QA** (Lint Roller) reviews the PR. Approve → hand to CTO. Fail → back to engineer directly with exact details.
- **CTO** (The Dogfather) reviews. Approve → CTO merges the `dev` PR. Fail → back to engineer.
### UAT branch (`uat`)
- **CTO** opens and merges a `dev``uat` PR.
### Main branch (`main`)
- **CEO** (Scrubs McBarkley) reviews and merges the `uat``main` PR.
`@cpfarhood` is cc'd for visibility on all PRs — never as a reviewer.
## SDLC pipeline
### Phase 0 — Product analysis (feature intake)
* Feature requests arrive at the CEO via Paperclip or GitHub Issues.
* CEO delegates to CMPO (Pawla Abdul) for review.
* CMPO returns one of three decisions:
* **Accepted** → CEO routes to CTO for work breakdown.
* **Backlogged** → CEO handles prioritization.
* **Denied** → CEO closes as unplanned.
* CTO breaks accepted work into atomic tasks and assigns to Engineering.
### Phase 1 — Dev
1. **Engineer** (Flea Flicker) branches from `dev`, writes code. GitOps deploys to dev on demand.
2. **Engineer** opens a PR against `dev`. CI must pass.
3. **QA (Lint Roller)** reviews the PR. Fail → back to engineer.
4. QA approves and hands off to CTO.
5. **CTO (The Dogfather)** reviews the PR. Fail → back to engineer.
6. **CTO** merges the dev PR.
7. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to Dev (`https://dev.groombook.dev`).
1. **Engineer** branches from `dev`, writes code.
2. **Engineer** opens a PR against `dev`.
3. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer**.
4. **CI** pass → **Engineer** merges PR.
5. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to Dev (`https://dev.groombook.dev`).
### Phase 2 — UAT promotion
8. **CTO** opens and merges a PR from `dev` to `uat`.
9. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to UAT (`https://uat.groombook.dev`).
10. **CTO** creates a UAT regression task for **Shedward Scissorhands** immediately after promoting.
1. **Engineer** opens a PR from `dev` to `uat`.
2. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
3. **CI** pass → **QA** performs code review.
4. **QA** rejected → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
5. **QA** approved → **Engineer** merges PR.
6. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to UAT (`https://uat.groombook.dev`).
### Phase 3 — UAT testing & security
### Phase 3 — User Testing & Security Review
11. **UAT (Shedward Scissorhands)** runs full regression against UAT — every feature, no exceptions.
12. UAT fail → CTO redistributes to engineer (return to Phase 1).
13. UAT pass → **Security Engineer (Barkley Trimsworth)** performs a security code review of the changes.
14. Security fail → CTO redistributes to engineer (return to Phase 1).
1. **UAT (Shedward Scissorhands)** runs full regression against UAT — every feature, old and new, no exceptions.
2. **UAT** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
3. **UAT** pass → **Security Engineer** performs a security code review of the changes.
4. **Security** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
5. **Security** pass → Begin Phase 4.
### Phase 4 — Production
### Phase 4 — Production Promotion
15. Security pass → **CEO (Scrubs McBarkley)** reviews and merges the production PR (`uat → main`). Fail → back to CTO.
16. **CI** deploys automatically to Production (`https://demo.groombook.dev`).
1. **Engineer** opens a PR from `uat` to `main`.
2. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
3. **CI** pass → **CTO** performs code review.
4. **CTO** rejected → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
5. **CTO** approved → **Engineer** merges PR.
6. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
7. **CI** pass → Begin Phase 5.
### Hierarchy rules
### Phase 5 — Production Deployment
* CTO rejections at Dev go directly to the engineer (not back through QA).
* UAT failures (Shedward) go to CTO — CTO cascades to engineer.
* Security failures (Barkley) go to CTO — CTO cascades to engineer.
* CEO rejections at Prod go to CTO.
The **Engineer** opens a PR against `groombook/infra` to update the relevant Kustomize overlay with the new image tag. From this point the work follows the **`devops` skill pipeline** end-to-end — review, merge, and Flux reconciliation are all owned there. On merge, Flux rolls out the updated pods to production (`https://demo.groombook.dev`).
> **Penetration testing.** Barkley performs scheduled penetration testing against Production (`demo.groombook.dev`) and Demo independently of the PR workflow. Board-authorized; not triggered per-PR. Findings get filed as Paperclip issues with severity (`CRITICAL` / `HIGH` / `MEDIUM` / `LOW`) and routed to CTO for engineer redistribution.
## Stage 1 CI — Image build
## Delegation model tier
Triggered automatically on every merge to `main` in an application repo:
- Builds and tags the Docker image: CalVer (`YYYY.MM.DD[.N]`), `latest`, and `sha-<hash>`
- Pushes tagged images to `git.farh.net/groombook/<service>` (see `coding-standards` for the registry and CalVer policy)
- Creates a CalVer git tag in the source repo
When creating subtasks for other agents, set `modelProfile: "cheap"` only for:
- Mechanical refactors or repetitive operations
- Basic information lookups
- Well-specified, bounded updates
Leave `modelProfile` unset for anything requiring judgment, reasoning, or QA review.
When in doubt, leave it unset.
## Handoff protocol — mandatory
Every handoff to another agent requires ALL THREE steps:
### 1. Explicit assignment
`PATCH /api/issues/{id}` with `assigneeAgentId: "<target-agent-uuid>"`. Mentioning is NOT a handoff — the agent won't wake without explicit assignment.
### 2. Status = `todo`
Every handoff sets `status: "todo"`. Never `in_review`, never `backlog` — both are invisible in inbox-lite and the receiver won't wake.
### 3. Release checkout
```
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/release
Headers: Authorization: Bearer $PAPERCLIP_API_KEY, X-Paperclip-Run-Id: $PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID
```
Without this release, the receiving agent cannot check out the issue.
**Saying you are reassigning a task is NOT the same as reassigning it.** Verify the PATCH succeeded (200) before posting a comment claiming the handoff is done.
## Infrastructure
* **Production / Demo:** namespace `groombook`, FQDN `demo.groombook.dev`
* **UAT:** namespace `groombook-uat`, FQDN `uat.groombook.dev`
* **Dev:** namespace `groombook-dev`, FQDN `dev.groombook.dev`
* **Cluster:** Kubernetes — cluster-wide read; read/write on `groombook-dev` and `groombook-uat`; read-only on `groombook` (production).
* **Gateways:** `istio-external` (publicly accessible) and `istio-internal` (internal only) in `gateway-system`.
* **Container registry:** `ghcr.io/groombook/<service>` only.
Stage 2 (Flux GitOps deployment) is owned by `devops`.
## Authentication
* **Framework:** Better-Auth.
* **Social login:** Google and Apple OAuth.
* **OAuth Providers:** GroomBook (Authentik), Google, and Apple.
* **SSO:** Authentik OIDC at `https://auth.farh.net` (credentials in `authentik-credentials` secret).
* **Never build custom authentication.**
## Deployment — 2-stage Flux GitOps
## Application tools (canonical, not alternatives)
**Stage 1 — CI (GitHub Actions, runs in each application repo):**
- Triggered automatically on every merge to `main`
- Builds and tags the Docker image
- Pushes tagged images to `ghcr.io/groombook/<service>`
These are application-level dependency choices. Alternatives are policy violations:
**Stage 2 — GitOps (Flux, managed externally):**
- Flux watches `groombook/infra` as the **target** GitRepository — it is **not** a Flux bootstrap/cluster repo.
- Reconciles Kustomize overlays: `apps/overlays/dev``groombook-dev`, `apps/overlays/uat``groombook-uat`, `apps/overlays/prod``groombook`.
* **Database:** CloudNativePG-managed Postgres — no SQLite, MariaDB, or MySQL.
* **Cache / pub-sub:** DragonflyDB — no Redis.
* **Authentication:** Better-Auth + Google + Apple + Authentik (see Authentication above).
* **Dependency updates:** Mend Renovate. **Dependabot is not used and will not be used.** Do not configure it.
* **Browser automation:** the `playwright` MCP server (`http://playwright:8931/mcp`). Target dev only — never test production.
**Policy — Flux Image Tag Automation is DENIED.** Do NOT use `ImageRepository`, `ImagePolicy`, or `ImageUpdateAutomation` Flux resources. Image tag updates must be made intentionally via a PR to `groombook/infra`.
**To deploy a change:**
1. Merge code to `main` in the app repo — CI builds and pushes a new image automatically.
2. Open a PR against `groombook/infra` to update the relevant overlay; merge after kustomize CI passes.
3. Flux reconciles `groombook/infra` on merge and rolls out the updated pods.
**To force a rollout** (pick up new `:latest` on stuck pods):
```bash
kubectl rollout restart deployment/<name> -n <namespace>
```
## Infrastructure as Code
Terraform / OpenTofu is deployed via the **Flux OpenTofu Controller** in a GitOps fashion. Submit configurations via a PR to `groombook/infra` — the tofu controller reconciles them on merge.
**Never run `tofu` directly.** Never `kubectl apply` against production. Production changes go through Flux only.
## Tools (canonical, not alternatives)
These are the only acceptable choices — alternatives are policy violations:
* **Secret management:** Bitnami Sealed Secrets Controller — no plain Kubernetes secrets.
* **Database:** CloudNativePG Operator (Postgres) — no SQLite, MariaDB, or MySQL.
* **Cache / pub-sub:** DragonflyDB Operator — no Redis.
* **Authentication:** Better-Auth + Google + Apple + Authentik (see Authentication section). Never build custom auth.
* **Dependency updates:** Mend Renovate. **Dependabot is not used and will not be used.**
* **Container registry:** `ghcr.io/groombook/<service>` — no Docker Hub for first-party images.
If a task requires deviating from any of the above, treat it as a destructive action: stop, file an issue with rationale, request board approval.
## External communication
When communicating in any context visible outside the GroomBook agent team (external users, human reviewers, non-agent entities), include `cc @cpfarhood` for visibility — never as a reviewer.
## No self-merge
No agent merges their own PR. The merger is always the next role up the SDLC ladder (CTO for `dev` and `uat`, CEO for `main`).
For the container registry, CalVer versioning, and general PR/test discipline, see `coding-standards`. For the operator install side (CNPG, Dragonfly, Sealed Secrets), see `devops`.