Compare commits
27 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6e0e29f374 | |||
| f69319e270 | |||
| deb507714b | |||
| 4df9637518 | |||
| 11fd2a4c34 | |||
| d6b13fa58d | |||
| c756b16c7c | |||
| 743e913126 | |||
| a0ae03e959 | |||
| 643d9e8956 | |||
| 93927ea402 | |||
| a51b28a315 | |||
| 198ed88350 | |||
| 2ae9c4c2d4 | |||
| c8d8cf562c | |||
| 693f719332 | |||
| bf5ecdc4dc | |||
| adff13f0d1 | |||
| a5e8027293 | |||
| 2d9e7cf8d1 | |||
| 712133590c | |||
| 60b9b41d4b | |||
| 403311044b | |||
| 9f9fb356f4 | |||
| 9cd8f1589f | |||
| 4ad08fb09c | |||
| 2cd0f295f8 |
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"mcpServers": {
|
||||
"gitea": {
|
||||
"type": "http",
|
||||
"url": "https://git-mcp.farh.net/mcp",
|
||||
"headers": {
|
||||
"Authorization": "Bearer ${GITEA_TOKEN}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
# CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
|
||||
|
||||
## Repository Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This is the GroomBook **agent skills repository** — it contains skill definitions that govern how AI agents operate within the GroomBook organization. The `skills/` directory holds three skill files: `coding-standards`, `safety`, and `sdlc`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Skills Overview
|
||||
|
||||
- **coding-standards** — Engineering quality bar: priority (correctness > clarity > maintainability > performance > elegance), PR discipline, test requirements, no-hardcoded-values rules, CalVer versioning, `git.farh.net` container registry policy.
|
||||
- **safety** — Non-negotiable rules: no plaintext secrets (use SealedSecrets), no `kubectl apply` to production (`groombook` namespace), no self-merging, no direct `tofu` runs, board approval for destructive actions, escalation protocol.
|
||||
- **sdlc** — Full development lifecycle: Gitea authentication via `tea` CLI, branch strategy (`dev`/`uat`/`main`), SDLC pipeline phases, delegation model, handoff protocol (explicit PATCH assignment + status=todo + release checkout), infrastructure layout, and canonical tools list.
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Operational Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- All changes go through PRs targeting `dev`. Never push directly to `dev`, `uat`, or `main`.
|
||||
- No agent merges their own PR.
|
||||
- Always include `cc @cpfarhood` at the bottom of PR bodies.
|
||||
- Gitea-origin issues require board approval before work begins.
|
||||
- Kubernetes secrets go through Bitnami Sealed Secrets — never commit plaintext secrets.
|
||||
- Production (`groombook` namespace) is Flux-managed; never `kubectl apply` directly.
|
||||
- Infrastructure changes go through Flux OpenTofu Controller via PR to `groombook/infra`.
|
||||
|
||||
## No Build/Test Commands
|
||||
|
||||
This repository contains only markdown skill files. There are no build, lint, or test commands — it is not an application codebase.
|
||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 244 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 213 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 286 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 181 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 228 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 172 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 263 KiB |
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ All releases use CalVer (`YYYY.MMDD.PATCH`, e.g. `2026.0504.0`). No SemVer, no c
|
||||
|
||||
## Container images
|
||||
|
||||
Push to `ghcr.io` only. Never Docker Hub for first-party images.
|
||||
Push to `git.farh.net` only. Never Docker Hub for first-party images.
|
||||
|
||||
## When uncertain
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: devops
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Infrastructure lifecycle for GroomBook. Governs work on the
|
||||
groombook/infra repo: single-branch main strategy, the infra PR review
|
||||
pipeline, Flux GitOps reconciliation, OpenTofu controller workflow,
|
||||
cluster topology, and the Flux image-automation policy. For application
|
||||
code, see the sdlc skill.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# DevOps Practices
|
||||
|
||||
This skill governs work on **`groombook/infra`**. For application code lifecycle, see the `sdlc` skill. For PR/test discipline and the `cc @cpfarhood` visibility rule, see `coding-standards`. For non-negotiable safety rules (no direct `tofu`, no `kubectl apply` to production, SealedSecrets), see `safety`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Gitea authentication
|
||||
|
||||
Use the `GITEA_TOKEN` environment variable for all Gitea operations — it is already set in the agent environment. Use the **`tea`** CLI for all Gitea/Git operations (e.g., `tea issue list`, `tea pr create`). Gitea is the primary source of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
## Branch strategy
|
||||
|
||||
`groombook/infra` uses a single long-lived branch: **`main`**. Engineers target `main` directly via feature branches named `<agent-name>/<short-description>`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Engineer** branches from `main`, writes code.
|
||||
2. **Engineer** opens a PR against `main`.
|
||||
3. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer**.
|
||||
4. **CI** pass → **QA** performs code review.
|
||||
5. **QA** rejected → back to **Engineer**.
|
||||
6. **QA** approved → **CTO** performs code review.
|
||||
7. **CTO** rejected → back to **Engineer**.
|
||||
8. **CTO** approved → **Engineer** merges PR → **Flux** reconciles automatically.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
tea pr create --base main --title "..." --body "... cc @cpfarhood"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Gitea branch protection requires CI checks to pass. See `coding-standards` for the no-self-merge contract and the `cc @cpfarhood` rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure topology
|
||||
|
||||
* **Production:** namespace `groombook`, FQDN `demo.groombook.dev`
|
||||
* **UAT:** namespace `groombook-uat`, FQDN `uat.groombook.dev`
|
||||
* **Dev:** namespace `groombook-dev`, FQDN `dev.groombook.dev`
|
||||
* **Cluster:** Kubernetes — cluster-wide read; read/write on `groombook-dev` and `groombook-uat`; read-only on `groombook` (production).
|
||||
* **Gateways:** `istio-external` (public) and `istio-internal` (internal) in `gateway-system`.
|
||||
* **Container registry:** `git.farh.net/groombook/<service>` only.
|
||||
|
||||
## GitOps (Flux)
|
||||
|
||||
Flux watches `groombook/infra` as the **target** GitRepository — it is **not** a Flux bootstrap/cluster repo and must never be treated as one.
|
||||
|
||||
Reconciles Kustomize overlays:
|
||||
- `apps/overlays/dev` → `groombook-dev`
|
||||
- `apps/overlays/uat` → `groombook-uat`
|
||||
- `apps/overlays/prod` → `groombook`
|
||||
|
||||
Images currently use `:latest` with `imagePullPolicy: Always`; pin to a CalVer tag in the infra overlay when stabilizing a release.
|
||||
|
||||
**Policy — Flux Image Tag Automation is DENIED.** Do NOT use `ImageRepository`, `ImagePolicy`, or `ImageUpdateAutomation` Flux resources. Image tag updates must be made intentionally via a PR to `groombook/infra` — typically as the final step of the `sdlc` application pipeline (Phase 5).
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
|
||||
Terraform (OpenTofu) is deployed via the **Flux OpenTofu Controller** in a GitOps fashion. Submit Terraform configurations via a PR to `groombook/infra` — the tofu controller reconciles them on merge. See `safety` for the prohibition on running `tofu` directly and on `kubectl apply` against production.
|
||||
|
||||
## Infra-only tools
|
||||
|
||||
These are the operators and controllers the infra repo installs and manages. Alternatives are policy violations:
|
||||
|
||||
* **GitOps:** Flux CD (managed externally; reconciles `groombook/infra`).
|
||||
* **IaC:** Flux OpenTofu Controller.
|
||||
* **Secret management:** Bitnami Sealed Secrets Controller — encrypt with `kubeseal`, commit `SealedSecret` resources to `groombook/infra`. No plain Kubernetes secrets.
|
||||
* **Database operator:** CloudNativePG (Postgres).
|
||||
* **Cache / pub-sub operator:** DragonflyDB.
|
||||
|
||||
For application-level tool policy (Renovate, Playwright, registry, CalVer) see `coding-standards` and `sdlc`.
|
||||
@@ -1,225 +1,109 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: sdlc
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Software development lifecycle for GroomBook. Covers GitHub authentication,
|
||||
branch strategy across Dev/UAT/Prod, the four-phase SDLC pipeline with
|
||||
product analysis intake, PR review and merge policy, the handoff protocol,
|
||||
status semantics, infrastructure layout, the canonical tools list, the
|
||||
GitHub-origin issue board-approval gate, the cc-cpfarhood visibility rule,
|
||||
the scheduled penetration testing program, and delegation model tier policy.
|
||||
Software development lifecycle for GroomBook application repos. Covers
|
||||
Gitea authentication, the 3-branch dev/uat/main strategy, the SDLC
|
||||
pipeline phases 1-5, the Stage 1 CI image build, the authentication
|
||||
framework, and application-tool policy. For infrastructure
|
||||
(groombook/infra), see the devops skill.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Software Development Lifecycle
|
||||
|
||||
## GitHub authentication
|
||||
This skill governs **application code repos**. For infrastructure (`groombook/infra`), see the `devops` skill. For PR/test discipline and the `cc @cpfarhood` visibility rule, see `coding-standards`. For non-negotiable safety rules, see `safety`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Invoke the `github-app-token` skill** before any GitHub operation. It generates a short-lived installation token and sets `GH_TOKEN`. **Never** run `gh auth login` — it hangs headless agents. Token expires after ~1 hour; re-invoke to regenerate.
|
||||
## Gitea authentication
|
||||
|
||||
GitHub is the **primary source of truth**. Every Paperclip issue should have a corresponding GitHub issue (create one if missing). Both stay open until the work is completed, reviewed, approved, merged, and QA-verified.
|
||||
**Use the `GITEA_TOKEN`** environment variable for all Gitea operations. It is already set in the agent environment. Use the **`tea`** CLI for all Gitea/Git operations (e.g., `tea issue list`, `tea pr create`). The token expires when the environment variable is rotated — re-invoke any Gitea operation if you get a 401.
|
||||
|
||||
## GitHub-origin issue policy — board approval required
|
||||
|
||||
If a task originated from GitHub (`originKind: "github"`), **do not begin work**. Immediately create a board approval:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/approvals
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "request_board_approval",
|
||||
"requestedByAgentId": "{your-agent-id}",
|
||||
"issueIds": ["{issueId}"],
|
||||
"payload": {
|
||||
"title": "Board approval required: GitHub issue",
|
||||
"summary": "Summarize what the GitHub issue requests.",
|
||||
"recommendedAction": "Approve to begin work.",
|
||||
"risks": ["Work begins without board review if approved."]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Set the issue to `blocked` with a comment linking to the approval. Only proceed once `PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_ID` is set and `PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_STATUS` indicates approval.
|
||||
Gitea is the **primary source of truth**. Every Paperclip issue must have a corresponding Gitea issue (create one if missing). Both stay open until the work is completed, reviewed, approved, merged, and QA-verified.
|
||||
|
||||
## Branch strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Three long-lived branches map to the three deployment environments:
|
||||
|
||||
| Branch | Environment | Who merges |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|-----------|
|
||||
| `dev` | Dev | CTO (after QA approval) |
|
||||
| `uat` | UAT | CTO (promotes `dev` → `uat`) |
|
||||
| `main` | Production | CEO (promotes `uat` → `main`) |
|
||||
| Branch | Environment | Who merges | Prerequisites for merge |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|-----------|-----------|
|
||||
| `dev` | Dev | Engineer | CI passes |
|
||||
| `uat` | UAT | Engineer | QA code review approval |
|
||||
| `main` | Production | Engineer | UAT validation & CTO code review |
|
||||
|
||||
**Engineers always target `dev`** — never `uat` or `main` directly. Feature branches: `<agent-name>/<short-description>`.
|
||||
**Engineers always target `dev` first** — never `uat` or `main` directly.
|
||||
- Feature branches: `<agent-name>/<short-description>`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pull requests
|
||||
|
||||
All changes happen via pull request. Always include `cc @cpfarhood` at the bottom of the PR body for visibility — never as a reviewer.
|
||||
All changes happen via pull request. Gitea branch protection requires CI checks to pass. See `coding-standards` for the no-self-merge contract and the `cc @cpfarhood` visibility rule.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
gh pr create --base dev --title "..." --body "... cc @cpfarhood"
|
||||
tea pr create --base dev --title "..." --body "... cc @cpfarhood"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## PR review & merge policy
|
||||
|
||||
### Dev branch (`dev`)
|
||||
|
||||
- **QA** (Lint Roller) reviews the PR. Approve → hand to CTO. Fail → back to engineer directly with exact details.
|
||||
- **CTO** (The Dogfather) reviews. Approve → CTO merges the `dev` PR. Fail → back to engineer.
|
||||
|
||||
### UAT branch (`uat`)
|
||||
|
||||
- **CTO** opens and merges a `dev` → `uat` PR.
|
||||
|
||||
### Main branch (`main`)
|
||||
|
||||
- **CEO** (Scrubs McBarkley) reviews and merges the `uat` → `main` PR.
|
||||
|
||||
`@cpfarhood` is cc'd for visibility on all PRs — never as a reviewer.
|
||||
|
||||
## SDLC pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 0 — Product analysis (feature intake)
|
||||
|
||||
* Feature requests arrive at the CEO via Paperclip or GitHub Issues.
|
||||
* CEO delegates to CMPO (Pawla Abdul) for review.
|
||||
* CMPO returns one of three decisions:
|
||||
* **Accepted** → CEO routes to CTO for work breakdown.
|
||||
* **Backlogged** → CEO handles prioritization.
|
||||
* **Denied** → CEO closes as unplanned.
|
||||
* CTO breaks accepted work into atomic tasks and assigns to Engineering.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1 — Dev
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Engineer** (Flea Flicker) branches from `dev`, writes code. GitOps deploys to dev on demand.
|
||||
2. **Engineer** opens a PR against `dev`. CI must pass.
|
||||
3. **QA (Lint Roller)** reviews the PR. Fail → back to engineer.
|
||||
4. QA approves and hands off to CTO.
|
||||
5. **CTO (The Dogfather)** reviews the PR. Fail → back to engineer.
|
||||
6. **CTO** merges the dev PR.
|
||||
7. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to Dev (`https://dev.groombook.dev`).
|
||||
1. **Engineer** branches from `dev`, writes code.
|
||||
2. **Engineer** opens a PR against `dev`.
|
||||
3. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer**.
|
||||
4. **CI** pass → **Engineer** merges PR.
|
||||
5. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to Dev (`https://dev.groombook.dev`).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2 — UAT promotion
|
||||
|
||||
8. **CTO** opens and merges a PR from `dev` to `uat`.
|
||||
9. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to UAT (`https://uat.groombook.dev`).
|
||||
10. **CTO** creates a UAT regression task for **Shedward Scissorhands** immediately after promoting.
|
||||
1. **Engineer** opens a PR from `dev` to `uat`.
|
||||
2. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
3. **CI** pass → **QA** performs code review.
|
||||
4. **QA** rejected → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
5. **QA** approved → **Engineer** merges PR.
|
||||
6. **CI** builds and deploys automatically to UAT (`https://uat.groombook.dev`).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3 — UAT testing & security
|
||||
### Phase 3 — User Testing & Security Review
|
||||
|
||||
11. **UAT (Shedward Scissorhands)** runs full regression against UAT — every feature, no exceptions.
|
||||
12. UAT fail → CTO redistributes to engineer (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
13. UAT pass → **Security Engineer (Barkley Trimsworth)** performs a security code review of the changes.
|
||||
14. Security fail → CTO redistributes to engineer (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
1. **UAT (Shedward Scissorhands)** runs full regression against UAT — every feature, old and new, no exceptions.
|
||||
2. **UAT** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
3. **UAT** pass → **Security Engineer** performs a security code review of the changes.
|
||||
4. **Security** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
5. **Security** pass → Begin Phase 4.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4 — Production
|
||||
### Phase 4 — Production Promotion
|
||||
|
||||
15. Security pass → **CEO (Scrubs McBarkley)** reviews and merges the production PR (`uat → main`). Fail → back to CTO.
|
||||
16. **CI** deploys automatically to Production (`https://demo.groombook.dev`).
|
||||
1. **Engineer** opens a PR from `uat` to `main`.
|
||||
2. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
3. **CI** pass → **CTO** performs code review.
|
||||
4. **CTO** rejected → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
5. **CTO** approved → **Engineer** merges PR.
|
||||
6. **CI** fail → back to **Engineer** (return to Phase 1).
|
||||
7. **CI** pass → Begin Phase 5.
|
||||
|
||||
### Hierarchy rules
|
||||
### Phase 5 — Production Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
* CTO rejections at Dev go directly to the engineer (not back through QA).
|
||||
* UAT failures (Shedward) go to CTO — CTO cascades to engineer.
|
||||
* Security failures (Barkley) go to CTO — CTO cascades to engineer.
|
||||
* CEO rejections at Prod go to CTO.
|
||||
The **Engineer** opens a PR against `groombook/infra` to update the relevant Kustomize overlay with the new image tag. From this point the work follows the **`devops` skill pipeline** end-to-end — review, merge, and Flux reconciliation are all owned there. On merge, Flux rolls out the updated pods to production (`https://demo.groombook.dev`).
|
||||
|
||||
> **Penetration testing.** Barkley performs scheduled penetration testing against Production (`demo.groombook.dev`) and Demo independently of the PR workflow. Board-authorized; not triggered per-PR. Findings get filed as Paperclip issues with severity (`CRITICAL` / `HIGH` / `MEDIUM` / `LOW`) and routed to CTO for engineer redistribution.
|
||||
## Stage 1 CI — Image build
|
||||
|
||||
## Delegation model tier
|
||||
Triggered automatically on every merge to `main` in an application repo:
|
||||
- Builds and tags the Docker image: CalVer (`YYYY.MM.DD[.N]`), `latest`, and `sha-<hash>`
|
||||
- Pushes tagged images to `git.farh.net/groombook/<service>` (see `coding-standards` for the registry and CalVer policy)
|
||||
- Creates a CalVer git tag in the source repo
|
||||
|
||||
When creating subtasks for other agents, set `modelProfile: "cheap"` only for:
|
||||
- Mechanical refactors or repetitive operations
|
||||
- Basic information lookups
|
||||
- Well-specified, bounded updates
|
||||
|
||||
Leave `modelProfile` unset for anything requiring judgment, reasoning, or QA review.
|
||||
|
||||
When in doubt, leave it unset.
|
||||
|
||||
## Handoff protocol — mandatory
|
||||
|
||||
Every handoff to another agent requires ALL THREE steps:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Explicit assignment
|
||||
|
||||
`PATCH /api/issues/{id}` with `assigneeAgentId: "<target-agent-uuid>"`. Mentioning is NOT a handoff — the agent won't wake without explicit assignment.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Status = `todo`
|
||||
|
||||
Every handoff sets `status: "todo"`. Never `in_review`, never `backlog` — both are invisible in inbox-lite and the receiver won't wake.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Release checkout
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/release
|
||||
Headers: Authorization: Bearer $PAPERCLIP_API_KEY, X-Paperclip-Run-Id: $PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Without this release, the receiving agent cannot check out the issue.
|
||||
|
||||
**Saying you are reassigning a task is NOT the same as reassigning it.** Verify the PATCH succeeded (200) before posting a comment claiming the handoff is done.
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
* **Production / Demo:** namespace `groombook`, FQDN `demo.groombook.dev`
|
||||
* **UAT:** namespace `groombook-uat`, FQDN `uat.groombook.dev`
|
||||
* **Dev:** namespace `groombook-dev`, FQDN `dev.groombook.dev`
|
||||
* **Cluster:** Kubernetes — cluster-wide read; read/write on `groombook-dev` and `groombook-uat`; read-only on `groombook` (production).
|
||||
* **Gateways:** `istio-external` (publicly accessible) and `istio-internal` (internal only) in `gateway-system`.
|
||||
* **Container registry:** `ghcr.io/groombook/<service>` only.
|
||||
Stage 2 (Flux GitOps deployment) is owned by `devops`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Authentication
|
||||
|
||||
* **Framework:** Better-Auth.
|
||||
* **Social login:** Google and Apple OAuth.
|
||||
* **OAuth Providers:** GroomBook (Authentik), Google, and Apple.
|
||||
* **SSO:** Authentik OIDC at `https://auth.farh.net` (credentials in `authentik-credentials` secret).
|
||||
* **Never build custom authentication.**
|
||||
|
||||
## Deployment — 2-stage Flux GitOps
|
||||
## Application tools (canonical, not alternatives)
|
||||
|
||||
**Stage 1 — CI (GitHub Actions, runs in each application repo):**
|
||||
- Triggered automatically on every merge to `main`
|
||||
- Builds and tags the Docker image
|
||||
- Pushes tagged images to `ghcr.io/groombook/<service>`
|
||||
These are application-level dependency choices. Alternatives are policy violations:
|
||||
|
||||
**Stage 2 — GitOps (Flux, managed externally):**
|
||||
- Flux watches `groombook/infra` as the **target** GitRepository — it is **not** a Flux bootstrap/cluster repo.
|
||||
- Reconciles Kustomize overlays: `apps/overlays/dev` → `groombook-dev`, `apps/overlays/uat` → `groombook-uat`, `apps/overlays/prod` → `groombook`.
|
||||
* **Database:** CloudNativePG-managed Postgres — no SQLite, MariaDB, or MySQL.
|
||||
* **Cache / pub-sub:** DragonflyDB — no Redis.
|
||||
* **Authentication:** Better-Auth + Google + Apple + Authentik (see Authentication above).
|
||||
* **Dependency updates:** Mend Renovate. **Dependabot is not used and will not be used.** Do not configure it.
|
||||
* **Browser automation:** the `playwright` MCP server (`http://playwright:8931/mcp`). Target dev only — never test production.
|
||||
|
||||
**Policy — Flux Image Tag Automation is DENIED.** Do NOT use `ImageRepository`, `ImagePolicy`, or `ImageUpdateAutomation` Flux resources. Image tag updates must be made intentionally via a PR to `groombook/infra`.
|
||||
|
||||
**To deploy a change:**
|
||||
1. Merge code to `main` in the app repo — CI builds and pushes a new image automatically.
|
||||
2. Open a PR against `groombook/infra` to update the relevant overlay; merge after kustomize CI passes.
|
||||
3. Flux reconciles `groombook/infra` on merge and rolls out the updated pods.
|
||||
|
||||
**To force a rollout** (pick up new `:latest` on stuck pods):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
kubectl rollout restart deployment/<name> -n <namespace>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure as Code
|
||||
|
||||
Terraform / OpenTofu is deployed via the **Flux OpenTofu Controller** in a GitOps fashion. Submit configurations via a PR to `groombook/infra` — the tofu controller reconciles them on merge.
|
||||
|
||||
**Never run `tofu` directly.** Never `kubectl apply` against production. Production changes go through Flux only.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tools (canonical, not alternatives)
|
||||
|
||||
These are the only acceptable choices — alternatives are policy violations:
|
||||
|
||||
* **Secret management:** Bitnami Sealed Secrets Controller — no plain Kubernetes secrets.
|
||||
* **Database:** CloudNativePG Operator (Postgres) — no SQLite, MariaDB, or MySQL.
|
||||
* **Cache / pub-sub:** DragonflyDB Operator — no Redis.
|
||||
* **Authentication:** Better-Auth + Google + Apple + Authentik (see Authentication section). Never build custom auth.
|
||||
* **Dependency updates:** Mend Renovate. **Dependabot is not used and will not be used.**
|
||||
* **Container registry:** `ghcr.io/groombook/<service>` — no Docker Hub for first-party images.
|
||||
|
||||
If a task requires deviating from any of the above, treat it as a destructive action: stop, file an issue with rationale, request board approval.
|
||||
|
||||
## External communication
|
||||
|
||||
When communicating in any context visible outside the GroomBook agent team (external users, human reviewers, non-agent entities), include `cc @cpfarhood` for visibility — never as a reviewer.
|
||||
|
||||
## No self-merge
|
||||
|
||||
No agent merges their own PR. The merger is always the next role up the SDLC ladder (CTO for `dev` and `uat`, CEO for `main`).
|
||||
For the container registry, CalVer versioning, and general PR/test discipline, see `coding-standards`. For the operator install side (CNPG, Dragonfly, Sealed Secrets), see `devops`.
|
||||
|
||||