Compare commits

...

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Farhood d8dbec1be1 Merge pull request #304 from groombook/docs/branch-strategy-contributing
docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with branch strategy (GRO-702)
2026-04-16 06:59:15 -04:00
Scrubs McBarkley 4a65c30d40 docs: fix bash snippet quoting and add uat→main pr command
- Fix \n quoting in two gh pr create commands: use ANSI-C $'...'
  quoting so newlines render correctly in PR bodies (not literal \n)
- Add missing gh pr create example for the UAT → main promotion step

Addresses Greptile review feedback on PR #304.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-16 10:43:12 +00:00
Scrubs McBarkley cab17e0230 docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with branch strategy
Document the three-branch GitOps model (dev/uat/main), developer
workflow, promotion flow, and branch protection rules.

Refs GRO-702

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-16 10:39:40 +00:00
groombook-cto[bot] b904418628 fix(GRO-640): replace N+1 queries in sendConfirmationEmail with single JOIN query
CTO approved: clean perf fix replacing 4 sequential DB queries with a single JOIN. QA approved.
2026-04-16 10:14:06 +00:00
groombook-cto[bot] 5ff54ce8f9 fix(GRO-689): only validate authorizationUrl hostname, add OIDC_INTERNAL_BASE in dev (#302)
fix(GRO-689): only validate authorizationUrl hostname, add OIDC_INTERNAL_BASE in dev
2026-04-16 05:18:58 +00:00
groombook-cto[bot] a2cfdfef74 Merge branch 'main' into fix/gro-689-oidc-hostname-validation 2026-04-16 05:15:28 +00:00
groombook-cto[bot] ab9384d38e feat(GRO-690): add groomer persona seed support via env vars (#303)
feat(GRO-690): add groomer persona seed support via env vars
2026-04-16 05:11:07 +00:00
groombook-cto[bot] 6ba6da08b2 Merge branch 'main' into fix/gro-689-oidc-hostname-validation 2026-04-16 05:08:23 +00:00
Flea Flicker 29a726fa3d feat(GRO-690): add groomer persona seed support via env vars
Extend seed.ts with SEED_UAT_GROOMER_EMAILS and SEED_UAT_GROOMER_NAMES
env vars for persistent groomer personas (sam@sarah). Works in both
SEED_KNOWN_USERS_ONLY=true and full seed modes.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-16 05:04:52 +00:00
Flea Flicker cdf4d6c4b1 fix(GRO-689): only validate authorizationUrl hostname, add OIDC_INTERNAL_BASE in dev
- Move hostname validation to run AFTER OIDC_INTERNAL_BASE replacement
  (was checking raw discovery URLs before replacement caused false positives)
- Only validate authorizationUrl hostname against issuer; token/userinfo
  are server-to-server and may legitimately use internal hostnames
- Infra: add OIDC_INTERNAL_BASE env var to dev overlay (was missing, matches UAT)

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-16 04:55:17 +00:00
groombook-cto[bot] ffb3cd139a Merge pull request #296 from groombook/fix/gro-666-uat-seed-better-auth-user-id
fix(seed): populate userId for UAT staff and SEED_ADMIN_EMAIL staff
2026-04-16 04:17:14 +00:00
Flea Flicker 85cff19c59 fix(GRO-666): make migration 0028 idempotent to resolve E2E failure
- Add IF NOT EXISTS to all ADD COLUMN statements (schema already has these columns)
- Use DROP CONSTRAINT IF EXISTS for both possible auto-generated constraint names
- Idempotent: safe to re-run on databases that already have the schema changes

cc @cpfarhood

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-15 15:25:20 +00:00
Flea Flicker 376180ab9d fix: make email required in createClientSchema to match NOT NULL column
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-15 10:52:45 +00:00
7 changed files with 190 additions and 53 deletions
+90
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
# Contributing to GroomBook
## Branch Strategy
GroomBook uses a three-branch GitOps model:
| Branch | Environment | Purpose |
|--------|-------------|---------|
| `dev` | Development | Active development target — all feature/fix PRs target this branch |
| `uat` | UAT / Staging | Promoted from `dev` by the CTO for acceptance testing |
| `main` | Production | Promoted from `uat` by the CEO; triggers production deployment |
**Never open a PR directly to `uat` or `main`.** All work flows through `dev` first.
## Developer Workflow
1. **Branch from `dev`** — create a feature or fix branch:
```bash
git checkout dev
git pull origin dev
git checkout -b feat/my-feature
```
2. **Open a PR targeting `dev`** — include the issue identifier in the title and cc @cpfarhood:
```bash
gh pr create --base dev --title "feat: description (GRO-NNN)" \
--body $'Closes GRO-NNN\n\ncc @cpfarhood'
```
3. **Pipeline gates before merge to `dev`:**
- QA (Lint Roller) reviews first — code quality, test coverage, CI pass
- CTO (The Dogfather) reviews second — architecture and final approval
- Both must approve; 2 approving reviews required by branch protection
## Promotion Flow
### Dev → UAT
After merging to `dev`, the CTO opens a PR from `dev` → `uat`:
```bash
gh pr create --base uat --head dev \
--title "chore: promote dev to uat (YYYY.MM.DD)" \
--body $'Promoting dev to UAT for regression and security review.\n\ncc @cpfarhood'
```
Gates:
- Shedward Scissorhands runs regression/acceptance tests
- Barkley Trimsworth performs security review
- CTO approves and merges (1 approving review required)
### UAT → Main (Production)
After UAT passes, the CTO opens a PR from `uat` → `main` and assigns it to the CEO:
```bash
gh pr create --base main --head uat \
--title "chore: promote uat to main (YYYY.MM.DD)" \
--body $'Promoting UAT to production.\n\ncc @cpfarhood'
```
Gates:
- CEO (Scrubs McBarkley) reviews for business alignment and merges
- 1 approving review required; triggers auto-deploy to Production
## Branch Protection Summary
| Branch | Required Approvals | Who approves |
|--------|--------------------|-------------|
| `dev` | 2 | QA (Lint Roller) + CTO (The Dogfather) |
| `uat` | 1 | CTO (The Dogfather) |
| `main` | 1 | CEO (Scrubs McBarkley) |
Force-pushes and branch deletions are disabled on all three branches.
## Commit Style
Use [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/):
- `feat:` — new feature
- `fix:` — bug fix
- `chore:` — maintenance (dependency updates, build config, promotions)
- `docs:` — documentation only
- `ci:` — CI/CD changes
- `refactor:` — code restructure without behaviour change
Reference the Paperclip issue in the commit body: `Refs GRO-NNN`.
## Questions?
Open a Paperclip issue in the GRO project or ask in the team channel.
+3 -2
View File
@@ -195,10 +195,11 @@ describe("POST /clients", () => {
expect(insertedValues[0]!.name).toBe("Charlie");
});
it("creates a client with only required name field", async () => {
const res = await jsonRequest("POST", "/clients", { name: "Dana" });
it("creates a client with name and email", async () => {
const res = await jsonRequest("POST", "/clients", { name: "Dana", email: "dana@example.com" });
expect(res.status).toBe(201);
expect(insertedValues[0]!.name).toBe("Dana");
expect(insertedValues[0]!.email).toBe("dana@example.com");
});
it("rejects empty name", async () => {
+4 -8
View File
@@ -204,15 +204,11 @@ export async function initAuth(): Promise<void> {
const userInfoUrl = discovery.userinfo_endpoint;
if (authzUrl && tokenUrl && userInfoUrl) {
const authzUrlObj = new URL(authzUrl);
const tokenUrlObj = new URL(tokenUrl);
const userInfoUrlObj = new URL(userInfoUrl);
if (
authzUrlObj.hostname !== issuerHostname ||
tokenUrlObj.hostname !== issuerHostname ||
userInfoUrlObj.hostname !== issuerHostname
) {
// Only validate authorizationUrl hostname against issuer — token/userinfo
// may legitimately use internal hostnames (OIDC_INTERNAL_BASE) for server-to-server calls.
if (authzUrlObj.hostname !== issuerHostname) {
throw new Error(
`[FATAL] OIDC discovery URL hostname mismatch: expected '${issuerHostname}' but got '${authzUrlObj.hostname}', '${tokenUrlObj.hostname}', or '${userInfoUrlObj.hostname}'. This may indicate a man-in-the-middle attack.`
`[FATAL] OIDC discovery URL hostname mismatch: expected '${issuerHostname}' but got '${authzUrlObj.hostname}'. This may indicate a man-in-the-middle attack.`
);
}
oidcConfig = {
+24 -33
View File
@@ -338,44 +338,35 @@ async function sendConfirmationEmail(
db: ReturnType<typeof getDb>,
appt: typeof appointments.$inferSelect
): Promise<void> {
const [client] = await db
.select({ name: clients.name, email: clients.email, emailOptOut: clients.emailOptOut })
.from(clients)
.where(eq(clients.id, appt.clientId))
const [row] = await db
.select({
clientName: clients.name,
clientEmail: clients.email,
clientEmailOptOut: clients.emailOptOut,
petName: pets.name,
serviceName: services.name,
groomerName: staff.name,
})
.from(appointments)
.innerJoin(clients, eq(clients.id, appointments.clientId))
.innerJoin(pets, eq(pets.id, appointments.petId))
.innerJoin(services, eq(services.id, appointments.serviceId))
.leftJoin(staff, eq(staff.id, appointments.staffId))
.where(eq(appointments.id, appt.id))
.limit(1);
if (!client || !client.email || client.emailOptOut) return;
if (!row) return;
const { clientName, clientEmail, clientEmailOptOut, petName, serviceName, groomerName } = row;
const [pet] = await db
.select({ name: pets.name })
.from(pets)
.where(eq(pets.id, appt.petId))
.limit(1);
const [service] = await db
.select({ name: services.name })
.from(services)
.where(eq(services.id, appt.serviceId))
.limit(1);
let groomerName: string | null = null;
if (appt.staffId) {
const [groomer] = await db
.select({ name: staff.name })
.from(staff)
.where(eq(staff.id, appt.staffId))
.limit(1);
groomerName = groomer?.name ?? null;
}
if (!pet || !service) return;
if (!clientEmail || clientEmailOptOut) return;
if (!petName || !serviceName) return;
const sent = await sendEmail(
buildConfirmationEmail(client.email, {
clientName: client.name,
petName: pet.name,
serviceName: service.name,
groomerName,
buildConfirmationEmail(clientEmail, {
clientName,
petName,
serviceName,
groomerName: groomerName ?? null,
startTime: appt.startTime,
})
);
+1 -1
View File
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ export const clientsRouter = new Hono<AppEnv>();
const createClientSchema = z.object({
name: z.string().min(1).max(200),
email: z.string().email().optional(),
email: z.string().email(),
phone: z.string().max(50).optional(),
address: z.string().max(500).optional(),
notes: z.string().max(2000).optional(),
+12 -9
View File
@@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
-- SMS opt-in fields for clients
ALTER TABLE "clients" ADD COLUMN "sms_opt_in" boolean NOT NULL DEFAULT false;
ALTER TABLE "clients" ADD COLUMN "sms_consent_date" timestamp;
ALTER TABLE "clients" ADD COLUMN "sms_opt_out_date" timestamp;
ALTER TABLE "clients" ADD COLUMN "sms_consent_text" text;
-- SMS opt-in fields for clients (idempotent)
ALTER TABLE "clients" ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS "sms_opt_in" boolean NOT NULL DEFAULT false;
ALTER TABLE "clients" ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS "sms_consent_date" timestamp;
ALTER TABLE "clients" ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS "sms_opt_out_date" timestamp;
ALTER TABLE "clients" ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS "sms_consent_text" text;
-- Add channel column to reminder_logs with default 'email'
ALTER TABLE "reminder_logs" ADD COLUMN "channel" text NOT NULL DEFAULT 'email';
-- Add channel column to reminder_logs with default 'email' (idempotent)
ALTER TABLE "reminder_logs" ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS "channel" text NOT NULL DEFAULT 'email';
-- Drop the old unique constraint and recreate with channel
ALTER TABLE "reminder_logs" DROP CONSTRAINT "reminder_logs_appointment_id_reminder_type_unique";
-- Drop old unique constraints if they exist (idempotent)
ALTER TABLE "reminder_logs" DROP CONSTRAINT IF EXISTS "reminder_logs_appointment_id_reminder_type_key";
ALTER TABLE "reminder_logs" DROP CONSTRAINT IF EXISTS "reminder_logs_appointment_id_reminder_type_unique";
-- Add new unique constraint with channel
ALTER TABLE "reminder_logs" ADD CONSTRAINT "reminder_logs_appointment_id_reminder_type_channel_unique" UNIQUE ("appointment_id", "reminder_type", "channel");
+56
View File
@@ -462,6 +462,37 @@ async function seedKnownUsers() {
}
}
// ── Staff: UAT Groomer Personas (SEED_UAT_GROOMER_EMAILS + SEED_UAT_GROOMER_NAMES) ──
const groomerEmails = process.env.SEED_UAT_GROOMER_EMAILS?.split(",").map((e) => e.trim()).filter(Boolean) ?? [];
const groomerNames = process.env.SEED_UAT_GROOMER_NAMES?.split(",").map((n) => n.trim()).filter(Boolean) ?? [];
const groomerCount = Math.min(groomerEmails.length, groomerNames.length);
for (let i = 0; i < groomerCount; i++) {
const email = groomerEmails[i]!;
const name = groomerNames[i]!;
// Use deterministic IDs in the 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000005+ range
const staffId = `00000000-0000-0000-0000-${String(5 + i).padStart(12, "0")}`;
const [existingGroomer] = await db
.select()
.from(schema.staff)
.where(eq(schema.staff.email, email))
.limit(1);
if (existingGroomer) {
console.log(`✓ Staff groomer '${existingGroomer.name}' already exists — skipping`);
} else {
await db.insert(schema.staff).values({
id: staffId,
name,
email,
oidcSub: email,
role: "groomer",
isSuperUser: false,
active: true,
});
console.log(`✓ Created staff groomer '${name}' (${email})`);
}
}
// ── Services: idempotent upsert using name as unique key ─────────────────────
// UNIQUE constraint on services.name (migration 0020) must exist first.
// Uses b0000001-... IDs to match main seed servicesDef for same-named services.
@@ -629,6 +660,31 @@ async function seed() {
console.log(`✓ Upserted admin staff '${adminName}' (${adminEmail})`);
}
// ── UAT Groomer Personas (SEED_UAT_GROOMER_EMAILS + SEED_UAT_GROOMER_NAMES) ──
const groomerEmails = process.env.SEED_UAT_GROOMER_EMAILS?.split(",").map((e) => e.trim()).filter(Boolean) ?? [];
const groomerNames = process.env.SEED_UAT_GROOMER_NAMES?.split(",").map((n) => n.trim()).filter(Boolean) ?? [];
const groomerCount = Math.min(groomerEmails.length, groomerNames.length);
for (let i = 0; i < groomerCount; i++) {
const email = groomerEmails[i]!;
const name = groomerNames[i]!;
const staffId = `00000000-0000-0000-0000-${String(5 + i).padStart(12, "0")}`;
await db.insert(schema.staff)
.values({
id: staffId,
name,
email,
oidcSub: email,
role: "groomer",
isSuperUser: false,
active: true,
})
.onConflictDoUpdate({
target: schema.staff.email,
set: { id: staffId, name, role: "groomer", isSuperUser: false, active: true },
});
console.log(`✓ Upserted groomer '${name}' (${email})`);
}
// ── Services ──
// Upsert services using name as unique key. With deterministic IDs in
// servicesDef and TRUNCATE clearing downstream tables first, this is