The OOBE flow on the web portal calls this endpoint to create a fresh
`clients` row bound to the Better Auth user's email when the SSO
bridge returns 404. Returns 201 on success, 409 if a client with that
email already exists (portal-selection case), 401/503 on auth issues,
400 on invalid body.
The OOBE success path navigates the user back to `/` and lets the
existing `session-from-auth` re-bridge; the new client is now
resolvable by email, so the bridge mints a real portal session.
Tests cover: 401 (no session), 400 (zod), 201 + persisted values
(name trimmed, optional fields normalized to null), 409 (existing
client or unique-constraint race), 503 (auth not configured).
Paired with the web PR on `feature/2357-p2-sso-to-oobe-routing`.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
(cherry picked from commit cdeebec021)
Resolves conflicts in UAT_PLAYBOOK.md, src/routes/portal.ts, and
src/__tests__/portal.test.ts (dev side wins — GRO-2342 changes are
the only diff in scope). Carries forward GRO-2139 reset.ts advisory
lock + GRO-2294 infra mcp trigger that were merged to dev but not
yet promoted to uat.
- src/routes/portal.ts: GET /portal/appointments now populates
service: {id, name} on both the synthetic waitlist card and the
appointment card (was {id} only). Same shape, no portal change
required.
- src/__tests__/portal.test.ts: services mock + TC-API-8.20 GRO-2342
assertions on the synthetic waitlist card service name.
- UAT_PLAYBOOK.md: TC-API-8.20 (GRO-2342) appended; TC-API-8.19
(GRO-2319) retained verbatim.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Resolves UAT_PLAYBOOK.md conflict by unioning uat-only TC-UAT-2/3 (GRO-2100)
with dev's §4.16 update + new §4.17. Code files taken from dev (superset).
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Lint Roller review on PR #152 flagged that the GRO-2100 seed change produces
new observable UAT API behavior that the playbook must reflect. Add two
deterministic rows pinning the contract GRO-1987 TC-UAT-2/3 will exercise:
- TC-UAT-2: uat-groomer + linked pet c0000001-...-002 (UAT Pup Alpha) → 200
- TC-UAT-3: uat-groomer + unlinked pet c0000001-...-003 (UAT Pup Beta) → 403
The 403-vs-404 note in TC-UAT-3 mirrors the verification note in the
GRO-2100 issue body so the QA runner knows where to file if the API
returns 404 (a separate RBAC defect, not against the seed).
Promote dev→uat: rbac Better-Auth auto-provision (GRO-2052)
Makes the pets.ts owner-bypass reachable for Better-Auth email/password customers by auto-provisioning a groomer staff row keyed on user.id. Unblocks GRO-2050 and GRO-2035.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
| TC-API-0.3 | DB-touching readiness check — response body safe | GET /api/readyz and inspect body | Body contains only `status` and (on error) `check` fields — no raw SQL, driver messages, or stack traces |
> **Note (GRO-1544):** Health endpoint registered on `api` basePath before auth middleware at `/api/health`. The old path `/health` was incorrect (routed to web pod via HTTPRoute `/*` rule).
> **Note (GRO-2678):** `/api/readyz` is a separate DB-touching endpoint for monitoring. It is intentionally NOT used for K8s liveness/readiness probes — those remain DB-less to avoid pod cycling on transient DB blips.
### 4.1 Authentication
@@ -442,38 +439,6 @@ Both use the stops' stored `latitude`/`longitude` in `stopOrder`: **origin = fir
| TC-API-18.10 | Groomer cannot export another's route | As groomer, export a route owned by a different groomer | 403 Forbidden (`groomers may only access their own route`) |
| TC-API-18.11 | Receptionist denied | As **receptionist**, export any route | 403 Forbidden (role not permitted) |
Verifies the API process does not crash on transient boot-time DB connection resets and that auth routes degrade gracefully until initialization succeeds.
| TC | Test Case | Steps | Expected Result |
|----|-----------|-------|-----------------|
| TC-API-19.1 | Health endpoint available before auth init | 1. Deploy the image (or restart the api pod)<br>2. `GET /health` immediately (within first 2 s of pod start) | 200 `{"status":"ok"}` — server accepts requests before `initAuth()` completes |
| TC-API-19.2 | Auth routes return 503 when auth not yet initialized | 1. Temporarily set `OIDC_ISSUER` to an unreachable host so `initAuth()` keeps retrying<br>2. `POST /api/auth/sign-in/email` during the retry window | 503 `{"error":"Authentication not configured"}` — process stays alive, does not exit |
| TC-API-19.3 | Pod does not crash on first-attempt DB reset | 1. Review pod restart count after normal deployment<br>2. Confirm `kubectl get pod -n groombook` shows `RESTARTS: 0` (or same as before deploy) for the new pod | No new restarts — ECONNRESET causes retry, not process exit |
| TC-API-19.4 | DB query retry log lines visible | After deploy, `kubectl logs -n groombook <api-pod>` | If any DB retry occurred, log lines matching `[auth] DB query attempt N failed` are present; on clean boot no retry lines appear |
| TC-API-19.5 | Auth init retry log lines visible | When auth init fails and retries, check pod logs | Log lines matching `[auth] initAuth attempt N failed` present; process continues; no `process.exit` |
| TC-API-19.6 | Auth succeeds after transient DB hiccup | 1. Allow pod to retry until DB is available<br>2. `POST /api/auth/sign-in/email` with valid credentials after init succeeds | 200 with session cookie — auth recovers without pod restart |
| TC-API-19.7 | Normal sign-in still works end-to-end | Follow TC-WEB-SSO-3 (SSO sign-in) on UAT | Successful sign-in, staff list visible — no regression from resilience changes |
| TC-API-19.8 | Public routes unaffected during auth retry | While auth is retrying (TC-API-19.2 setup), `GET /api/branding` | 200 with branding data — public routes bypass auth and serve normally |
### 4.20 Portal OOBE — Create Client from Auth (GRO-2359)
Verifies the `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` endpoint that creates a new `clients` row for a first-time SSO user (out-of-box-experience registration). This endpoint requires a valid Better Auth session but does NOT require a portal session; it is the pre-portal step in the new-user OOBE flow.
| TC | Test Case | Steps | Expected Result |
|----|-----------|-------|-----------------|
| TC-API-20.1 | Successful client creation | 1. Sign in via SSO to obtain a Better Auth session<br>2. `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` with `{ "name": "Test User" }` | 201 `{ "id": "<uuid>", "name": "Test User", "email": "<sso-email>" }` — new `clients` row created |
| TC-API-20.2 | All optional fields accepted | `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` with `{ "name": "Test User", "phone": "555-1234", "address": "1 Main St", "notes": "VIP" }` (authenticated) | 201 with `id`, `name`, `email`; row in DB has all four fields |
| TC-API-20.3 | Invalid body — missing name | `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` with `{}` (authenticated) | 400 (Zod validation failure); no row created |
| TC-API-20.4 | Invalid body — empty name | `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` with `{ "name": "" }` (authenticated) | 400 — name must be at least 1 character |
| TC-API-20.5 | No session — 401 | `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` with a valid body but **no** Better Auth session cookie | 401 `{ "error": "Unauthorized" }` |
| TC-API-20.6 | Existing email — 409 | 1. Create a client row whose email matches the signed-in SSO user's email<br>2. `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` as that user | 409 `{ "error": "A customer record with this email already exists" }` — no duplicate row |
| TC-API-20.7 | Auth not configured — 503 | Temporarily disable auth (e.g., point `OIDC_ISSUER` to an invalid host) so `getAuth()` throws<br>2. `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` | 503 `{ "error": "Authentication not configured" }` — graceful degradation |
| TC-API-20.8 | Concurrent insert race — 409 | Simulate two near-simultaneous requests from the same SSO user (before any row exists) | At most one request returns 201; the other returns 409 — no duplicate row, no 500 |
## Pass/Fail Criteria
**Pass:**
@@ -495,4 +460,3 @@ Verifies the `POST /api/portal/clients-from-auth` endpoint that creates a new `c
## Update Policy
Any PR that changes user-facing behaviour MUST update this file. Test cases must be added, modified, or removed to reflect the new behaviour. The PR description must reference which playbook section was updated (e.g., "Updated UAT_PLAYBOOK.md §4.4 — new appointment rescheduling flow").
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.